Fossil Fuel Dependence: A Call to Action

-- By ShayBanerjee - 13 Mar 2015

Introduction

Enough games. It is time to get serious.

America’s dependence on fossil fuels must end, and the federal government must end it. A 21st century economy requires a 21st century energy source, and fossil fuels do not pass muster. Like abolishing slavery or ending the Great Depression, this problem is too big for the free market to solve. The federal government must step up in a big way, and it must do so immediately.

A Losing Strategy

A developed economy in the modern era can no longer rely on fossil fuels as its principal energy source. Any suggestion to the contrary is outright denialism. The energy return on investment for fossil fuels plummets with each passing moment as the cost of exploration balloons and net yield on extraction declines. This fundamental economic reality has not changed in decades and no recent industry development can or will reverse the historical trend.

Peak oil and gas have come and gone, and the emergence of shale production did not change that reality. The so-called “Global Shale Revolution” was an embarrassing commercial failure, and the recent price crash has proven it. The undeserved hype surrounding shale led to over investment followed by overproduction, and now the industry is paying the price. Shale production depletes wells far too rapidly, offers dramatically few returns, and requires extreme levels of capital investment. Shale plays are therefore seeing dramatic cutbacks in the midst of the supply glut, as oil and gas drillers are instead reaching deep into their most productive regions. This development will only exacerbate long term cost pressures, and economies reliant on oil and gas companies will be caught bill-in-hand when there are no more low hanging fruits to pick.

The state of American coal is even more pathetic, as the last year has seen a record number of plants close, dramatic job cuts throughout the industry, and sharp consumer price increases. The principal causes of coal’s collapse are the skyrocketing costs of mining and depreciating yield quality, realities becoming abundantly clear not just in America, but also throughout the world. Instead of so much as feigning an attempt to fix its desperate state of affairs, American coal points the finger at the EPA. Blaming mild environmental regulations for a failing business model is the epitome of loser talk, and should be treated as such.

Unable to salvage their business model through game-changing business strategy or technological innovation, fossil fuel companies are increasingly funding exploration campaigns with retained earnings. They also rely heavily on government subsidies totaling $5.3 trillion globally. Countries possessing strong environmental movements are contemplating reducing or eliminating these subsidies, even if the United States is not. Many will impose carbon taxes or have already done so. There is a growing belief among world governments and institutions that fossil fuels are not a worthy investment for financial reasons or otherwise.

Despite these realities, the United States government continues to back the failing fossil fuel industry, and that mistake diverts from our economic strength. In addition to the government spending billions in subsidies on the fossil fuel industry,the government has spent an estimated $8 trillion since 1977 to protect midstream oil flow in the Persian Gulf alone. Moreover, pollution from fossil fuels produces an estimated $120 billion in domestic health care costs. Over the last several decades, our dependence on the fossil fuel industry has contributed to blundering foreign policy choices, multiple recessions, rising economic inequality, and a reduced moral standing in a world increasingly captivated by environmental politics.

Time is of the essence. Fossil fuels will be surpassed by energy sources better capable of providing for the needs of modern society. The question is no longer “if” but “when.” Alternative energy sources already undercut the price of fossil fuels in many regions, and, by some estimates, they will achieve complete grid parity by 2020. A storm is coming, and nations must reassert their economic positions in a changing world.

The Case for a National Solution

Energy, and energy alone, determines economic power.

Mainstream economic theories have repeatedly failed to identify this essential fact. Instead, at different time periods, political economists have variously emphasized the relative roles of land, labor and capital. Yet land is only as valuable as the resources produced on it directly or indirectly by solar energy. Labor is nothing more than the harnessing of human energy. And capital is simply the technical equipment capable of utilizing an energy throughput.

The underlying truth is this: when the predominant energy flow powering an economy becomes too costly, growth stagnates, civilizations become poorer, and societies collapse. Nations that lead counteract this by revolutionizing the processes by which energy is acquired, stored, and put into production. Nations that fall behind wait until it is too late.

At every recent turning point in human development, successful nations promoted more efficient energy strategy through government involvement. America is no exception. Following the Great Depression, the New Deal and WWII unleashed electrical modernization on the American home and petroleum-based automobiles on the American road. Decades before, the rapidly urbanizing North flexed its coal-fired industrial muscles, crushing the back of an antiquated Southern plantation system built around agricultural land and slave labor. Serious realignment of energy strategy has never been cheap or uncontroversial, but when history beckons, a Nation must answer the call.

We have reached another turning point, and the core infrastructure of the economy remains path dependent on obsolete energy processes. Our transportation systems, electrical networks, schools, hospitals, industries, and homes are equipped to run on fossil fuels. Our entire financial system booms and busts with the availability of petroleum, coal, and natural gas. Something fundamental must change, and the federal government must change it.The grid must be torn down and rebuilt. New vehicles must be designed and distributed. Residences, public facilities, and office buildings must be renovated from the ground up. As always, cultural forces tied to the Old Ways are resisting change, but we must continue unabated. Our Nation’s future demands basic transformation.

The time for excuses is over. We have work to do.

You can't beat something with nothing, the saying is. The draft has everything except so much as an intimation of an answer to its own question. Are we missing the suggestion that we fill the world with nuclear water-boilers like Fukushima, or that we run everything on wind turbines and solar panels? If the point was the hydrogen economy, why didn't the words appear? If the United States Government is supposed to do something, what is it supposed to do?

Author's Note: The topic of this essay obviously deviates substantially from the original, but I also believe that it is more faithful to my original purpose. Ultimately I wanted to write an essay that integrated biophysical notions of historical development with perspective on a contemporary social problem. I am convinced that this essay does so more forcefully than the last

Comments