Computers, Privacy & the Constitution

Resolving the Paradox: Public Collaboration, Data Sharing, and Privacy

-- By LuisVilla - 27 Feb 2008

Work In Progress

Since I have to do this in the wiki eventually anyway, I'm also drafting in the wiki. This is not yet a finished work; please don't judge it as such.

Collaboration in the Public Eye

"[W]e all derive immense benefit from reading one another's work..." -- Wiki manager, CompPrivConst? wiki

Publishing Personal Information Lowers Barriers to Participation

Publishing Personal Information Helps Create Community

The Privacy Instinct

Ohloh incident, generally and more specifically.

Is the trigger for the instinct aggregation? something else?

Perhaps the 'human view' of the aggregated data, per Kerr?

Can or should we distinguish between government spidering/aggregation and private/corporate spidering/aggregation?

Drawing Lines: Can Lowering the Barriers to Collaboration Tell Us Something About Our Privacy Instincts?

What is 'Minimal' Data?

Who Are Our Friends and Collaborators?

Where is the line between incidental data (names, cvs checkins) that we might tolerate being aggregated, and more personal data (health, etc.) that we might not tolerate?

Quantitative change -> qualitative change

Navigation

Webs Webs

r5 - 04 Mar 2008 - 14:57:34 - LuisVilla
This site is powered by the TWiki collaboration platform.
All material on this collaboration platform is the property of the contributing authors.
All material marked as authored by Eben Moglen is available under the license terms CC-BY-SA version 4.
Syndicate this site RSSATOM