English Legal History and its Materials

View   r6  >  r5  >  r4  >  r3  >  r2  >  r1
OnWitchraft 6 - 21 Dec 2019 - Main.IsraelRodriguezRubio
Line: 1 to 1
 
META TOPICPARENT name="ArticlesInProcess"
The Community's Peace: Witchcraft, Popular Culture, and the Law during the Early Modern Period
Added:
>
>
 “[I]n the case of Witch-Craft many things are very difficult, hidden, and infolded in mists and clouds, over-shadowing our reason and best understanding.”
Added:
>
>
 
Deleted:
<
<
John Cotta, The Triall of Witch-Craft (1616)
 
Changed:
<
<
>
>
John Cotta, The Triall of Witch-Craft (1616)
 INTRODUCTION

William Shakespeare’s Macbeth begins, not with the play’s namesake, but with a meeting of three witches at night. Under the cloak of darkness, the “weird sisters” gather to plan out their encounter with Macbeth. The play, written and performed around the turn of the 17th century, is one of the longest-lasting and most popular depictions of witchcraft. Though not main characters themselves (their names are but “First Witch,” “Second Witch,” and “Third Witch”), they are central to the unraveling of the plot. Marion Gibson notes that “with their economical, rhythmic and riddling speeches,” the weird sisters “create in a few short scenes an oppressive atmosphere of evil and mystery which blights the whole play.” Gibson at 112.

Changed:
<
<
Just like the three witches in the play, however, little is known about the witches they intended to imitate in real life. Theorizing their purpose in the play, Gibson notes a doubt left unanswered: “Attention is directed towards the source of evil, but nothing is revealed [about them] and the audience and readers, like the characters, are left unsatisfied.” Gibson at 112. Gibson’s analysis veers in the direction of attempting to explain the inspiration for the witch characters (likely a blend of Scottish and English references to indulge the King and audience, she notes). Id. Though modern readers of Shakespeare know very little, presumably, about the witches, how much did the audience at the time of the play’s development know? How did they relate to the characters (and what about the real witches)? After all, at the time of the play’s creation and performance, witchcraft was considered real by many—and a crime at that.
>
>
Just like the three witches in the play, however, little is known about the real witches they intended to imitate. Theorizing their purpose in the play, Gibson notes a doubt left unanswered: “Attention is directed towards the source of evil, but nothing is revealed [about them] and the audience and readers, like the characters, are left unsatisfied.” Gibson at 112. Gibson’s analysis veers in the direction of attempting to explain the inspiration for the witch characters (she notes a likely a blend of Scottish and English references to indulge the King and audience). Id. Though modern readers of Shakespeare know very little about the witches, how much did the audience at the time of the play’s development know and understand about the witches? How did they relate to the characters (and what about real witches themselves)? After all, at the time of the play’s creation and performance, witchcraft was considered real by many—and a crime at that.
 --
Deleted:
<
<
My intent in this paper is to explore some of the reasons why early Modern English people convicted others of witchcraft. Much is written on the evidence used to convict these women, for they were primarily women, of evil-doing but much less is known as to the reasons why the common belief allowed such an outcome. This, of course, is a far more complicated question with few definitive or satisfactory answers. Reaching the thoughts and beliefs of the common people is a difficult task to undertake. For one, what has passed on in time of common beliefs, much like the words of the weird sisters, has been facilitated through the mouths and memories of others(actors in real life, if you will). Most common people, after all, could not read or write. Additionally, the sources from which we can divine the common understanding of witchcraft are largely biased: the court sources, in the form of records and the writings of educated observers, and demonological tracts, written by theologians. Sharpe at 58.
 
Changed:
<
<
Left with few historical records, this papers reaches some of these questions by attempting to understand the cultural life which the witches and their accusers inhabited. My original inquiry into how witchcraft, again a crime, was proved at trial necessarily leads to the question of the state of mind of those on whom the conviction hung: the lay jurors. I use the anthropological writings, heavily borrowing from Clifford Geertz on common sense and the law, to arrive at some of the answers and to think through some other proposed suggestions.
>
>
My intent in this paper is to explore some of the reasons why early Modern English people convicted others of witchcraft. Much is written on the evidence used to convict these women, for they were primarily women, of evil-doing but much less is known as to the reasons why the common belief allowed such an outcome. This, of course, is a far more complicated question with few definitive or satisfactory answers. Reaching the thoughts and beliefs of the common people is a difficult task to undertake. For one, what has passed on in time of common beliefs, much like the words of the weird sisters, was facilitated through the mouths and memories of others (the sort of narrators of real life). After all, most common people could not read or write. Additionally, the sources from which we can divine the common understanding of witchcraft are largely biased: the court sources, in the form of records and the writings, of educated observers and the demonological tracts of theologians. Sharpe at 58.

Left with few historical records, this papers reaches some of these questions by attempting to understand the cultural life which the witches and their accusers inhabited. My original inquiry into how witchcraft, again a crime, was proved at trial necessarily leads to a focus on the states of mind of those on whom a conviction hung: the lay jurors. I use the anthropological writings, heavily borrowing from Clifford Geertz’ writings on common sense and the law, to arrive at some of the answers and to think through some other proposed answers.

 
Changed:
<
<
On some level, a basic one perhaps, witchcraft helped explain the reason why events, many of them tragic or unfortunate, occurred—why bad things happened to the supposed good people of the community. Though Trevor-Roper has called witchcraft persecution “[t]he rubbish of the human mind,” and he, in certain respects, is not wrong, it is also worth exploring the socio-cultural beliefs that made a belief in witchcraft real. Trevor-Roper at 97. As Carlo Ginzburg explores in Ecstasies, witchcraft persecution, with the witches’ sabbath at the center, emerges from a history of scapegoating in continental Europe. In this vein, common beliefs and imaginations were critical to the prosecution of witchcraft. Gaskill suggests that “no social, economic, religious or cultural facts shaped the history of English witchcraft more.” Gaskill, Witchcraft and Evidence, at 39. For a conviction of witchcraft to stand—that is, for the evidence to prove successful it had to convince the people of the community; it had to make sense of their lives.
>
>
On some level, a basic one perhaps, witchcraft helped explain the reason why events, many of them tragic or unfortunate, occurred—why bad things happened to the supposed good people of the community. Though Trevor-Roper has called witchcraft persecution “[t]he rubbish of the human mind”—and he is not wrong, in certain respects—it is also worth exploring the socio-cultural beliefs that made a belief in witchcraft real. Trevor-Roper at 97. As Carlo Ginzburg explores in Ecstasies, witchcraft persecution, with the witches’ sabbath at the center, emerged from a history of scapegoating in continental Europe. In this vein, common beliefs and imaginations were crucial to the prosecution of witchcraft. Gaskill suggests that “no social, economic, religious or cultural facts shaped the history of English witchcraft more.” Gaskill, Witchcraft and Evidence, at 39. For a conviction of witchcraft to stand—that is, for the evidence to prove successful—it had to convince the people of the community; it had to make sense of their lives.
 

SETTING THE STAGE

Changed:
<
<
The prosecution of witches in England materialized during the early modern period. By the sixteenth century, the belief in the existence of witchcraft was a common one and the belief in dark magic was regarded as “the logical corollary of the equally widespread possibility in the belief of beneficent magic.” Thomas at 437. Though the beliefs in dark magic “were as old as human history, and in no sense peculiarly English,” during the late Middle Ages, Christianity began to distinguish this type of magic from the unharmful kind. Thomas at 438. Among the intellectual class, what resulted was demonology, which constructed a new way of seeing the world from the old beliefs. Trevor-Roper at 91. As such, though witchcraft was ascribed to “virtually every kind of magical activity or ritual operation that worked by occult methods,” Thomas, in Douglas, at 48, it came to be regarded as the “supernatural activity, believed to be the result of power given by the Devil, and causing physical damage….” McFarlane? , in Douglas, at 82. In practice, the ways in which witchcraft mattered to English society differed between the learned classes and the rest of society. Whereas theologians and others who studied witchcraft were concerned with Devil-worshipping, a heretical practice, the “uneducated populace” was more concerned with the damage that these evil creatures caused to persons and property within the community—those experiences which they could feel and to which they fell victim at times. See Thomas, in Douglas, at 48-49; Sharpe.
>
>
The prosecution of witches in England materialized during the early modern period. By the sixteenth century, the belief in the existence of witchcraft was a common one and the belief in dark magic was regarded as “the logical corollary of the equally widespread possibility in the belief of beneficent magic.” Thomas at 437. Though the beliefs in dark magic “were as old as human history, and in no sense peculiarly English,” during the late Middle Ages, Christianity began to distinguish this type of magic from the unharmful kind. Thomas at 438. Among the intellectual class, what resulted was demonology, a field of study that constructed a new way of seeing the world from the old beliefs. Trevor-Roper at 91. As such, though witchcraft was ascribed to “virtually every kind of magical activity or ritual operation that worked by occult methods,” Thomas, The Relevance of Social Anthropology to the Historical Study of English Witchcraft, at 48, it came to be regarded as the “supernatural activity, believed to be the result of power given by the Devil, and causing physical damage….” McFarlane? at 82. In practice, the ways in which witchcraft mattered to English society differed between the learned classes and the rest of society. Whereas theologians and others who studied witchcraft were concerned with Devil-worshipping, a heretical practice, the “uneducated populace” was more concerned with the damage that these evil creatures caused to persons and property within their community—those experiences which they could feel and to which they fell victim at times. See Thomas, The Relevance of Social Anthropology to the Historical Study of English Witchcraft, at 48-49; Sharpe.
 
Changed:
<
<
Witchcraft rarely occurred among family members (except perhaps in cases of bewitched husbands or magical acts to induce marriage) and, as a result, was treated as more of a communal problem. Macfarlane at 87. As such, witches of the bad sort were really those who “afflict[ed] their neighbours and others with misfortune, sickness, and death, and who also practise[d] a range of ungodly magical rites in the community.” Marion, Intro at x. From these definitions, we can gather that witches accused of wrongdoing did not practice their craft silently. Rather, she was one who exposed her community to the evils which she possessed and with which she disturbed the community’s peace.
>
>
Since witchcraft rarely occurred among family members (except perhaps in cases of bewitched husbands or magical acts to induce marriage), it was regarded as more of a communal problem. Macfarlane at 87. As such, witches of the bad sort came to be seen as those who “afflict[ed] their neighbours and others with misfortune, sickness, and death, and who also practise[d] a range of ungodly magical rites in the community.” Marion, Intro at x. From these definitions, we can gather that witches accused of wrongdoing did not practice their craft silently. Rather, she was one who exposed her community to the evils which she possessed and with which she disturbed the peace.
 
Changed:
<
<
In the courtroom, witchcraft was treated as an “anti-social crime” rather than heresy. Court records suggest that most prosecutions were provoked by accusations of damage to persons and property in the community rather than worshipping with the Devil. Thomas at 443. Unlike theologians, witch finders were not as interested in “the mechanics of the operation than in the fact of the witch’s malice.” Thomas, in Douglas, at 51. Though proving either strand of the crime would seem like an uphill battle by modern evidentiary standards, the law of evidence, though in its development at the time, was not yet in place during the early modern period.
>
>
This view of witchcraft was taken up in the courtroom, where it was treated as an “anti-social crime” rather than heresy. Court records suggest that most prosecutions were provoked by accusations of damage to persons and property in the community rather than worshipping with the Devil. Thomas at 443. Unlike theologians, witch finders in the community were not as interested in “the mechanics of the operation than in the fact of the witch’s malice.” Thomas, The Relevance of Social Anthropology to the Historical Study of English Witchcraft, at 51. Though proving either strand of the crime would seem like an uphill battle by modern evidentiary standards, the law of evidence, though in its development at the time, was not yet in place during the early modern period.
 
Changed:
<
<
As to the actual evidence introduced, confessions, whether forced or otherwise obtained, “unnatural” body marks, and witness testimony became popular methods to substantiate the accusations of witchcraft. The records that remain of the processes are troublesome: not just because they are few but also because it is difficult to extract from them what the accused believed. Confessions should be analyzed with a healthy degree of skepticism as evidence of the accused’s actual beliefs. After all, demonologists and witch hunters advocated the use of trickery and false promises of leniency to extract confessions “from those who [were] obviously guilt but [would] not say so.” Gibson at 25. Though judicial torture was formally disallowed in England (unlike continental Europe and Scotland), it sometimes made its way into witch investigations by way of sleep deprivation and ordeals, such as “swimming a witch.” Witch hunters, like Matthew Hopkins, used these practices that verged on torture to obtain confessions. Hopkins, for example, popularized the use of “dunking” and “walking” the witch as means to extract confessions during the period of the Civil War.
>
>
Thus, as to the actual evidence introduced, confessions, whether forced or otherwise obtained, “unnatural” body marks, and witness testimony became popular methods to substantiate the accusations of witchcraft. Gaskill at 48.The records that remain of the processes are troublesome: not just because they are few but also because it is difficult to extract from them what the accused believed. Confessions should be analyzed with a healthy degree of skepticism as evidence of the accused’s actual beliefs. After all, demonologists and witch hunters advocated the use of trickery and false promises of leniency to extract confessions “from those who [were] obviously guilty but [would] not say so.” Gibson at 25. Though judicial torture was formally disallowed in England (unlike continental Europe and Scotland), it made its way into witch investigations at times by way of sleep deprivation and the return of ordeals, such as “swimming a witch.” Matthew Hopkins, a popular witch hunter during the Civil War, used these practices, which verged on torture, to obtain confessions from the accused. Hopkins, for example, popularized the use of “dunking” the accused into water and “walking” the sleepless witch as ways to extract confessions. Gaskill at 52-53. See Trevor-Roper at 119 n.1.
 
Changed:
<
<
As indicated, little remains of the thoughts and beliefs of those accusers, but far less remains of the unmitigated thoughts and beliefs of those accused of witchcraft. Though much is speculated about the minds of the accusers, far less is known about the accused. Gaskill notes, if merely in passing, “Most suspects were marginal women whose confessions reflected the misery of hardship, anxiety of moral guilt, and fear of damnation.” Gaskill at 53. Though the outcome of these cases largely turned on what the accused confessed to, we can discern far less about what they thought, even from their supposed own words. As Geertz has remarked, “Men, of course, can lie, and, especially in the presence of judges, often do....” Geertz at 189.
>
>
Even within this system, little remains of the thoughts and beliefs of the accusers; but far less remains and is known of the unmitigated thoughts and beliefs of the accused. Gaskill notes, if merely in passing, “Most suspects were marginal women whose confessions reflected the misery of hardship, anxiety of moral guilt, and fear of damnation.” Gaskill at 53. Though the outcome of these cases largely turned on what they confessed to, we can discern far less about what they thought, even from their supposed own words. As Geertz remarked in Local Knowledge: Fact and Law in Comparative Perspective, “Men, of course, can lie, and, especially in the presence of judges, often do....” At 189.
 

PULLING BACK THE CURTAIN

Changed:
<
<
What is perhaps most readily striking in the prosecution of witchcraft is the process of law in the making: its effort to find and form some sort of relation—whether of alignment or power over or something else—with the community and its values. This is perhaps part of what Geertz meant when he wrote that “the ‘law’ side of things is not a bounded set of norms, rules, principles, values, or whatever from which jural responses to distilled events can be drawn, but part of a distinctive manner of imagining the real.” Geertz at xxxx (Local Knowledge). Through witchcraft, the beliefs from above—whether intellectual, divinely ordered, or both—merged with the lived experiences and beliefs of those below. In this, we see a process that is not neat or orderly but constantly in flux and struggling to make sense of relations between the people in the community and their systems.
>
>
What is perhaps most readily striking in the prosecution of witchcraft is the process of law in the making: its effort to find and form some sort of relation—whether of alignment or power over or something else—with the community and its values. This is perhaps part of what Geertz meant when he wrote that “the ‘law’ side of things is not a bounded set of norms, rules, principles, values, or whatever from which jural responses to distilled events can be drawn, but part of a distinctive manner of imagining the real.” Geertz at 173. Through witchcraft, the beliefs from above—whether intellectual, divinely ordered, or both—merged with the lived experiences and beliefs of those below. In this, we see a process that is not neat or orderly but constantly in flux and struggling to make sense of the relations between the people in the community and their systems.

Keith Thomas and Alan Macfarlane have both offered valuable insight into the function of witchcraft in early modern society. In The Relevance of Social Anthropology to the Historical Study of English Witchcraft, Thomas suggests that witch accusations helped alleviate the pressures, whether of social, moral, and/or religious guilt, that afflicted community members as English society moved away from reliance on private charity for care of the poor to ideals of self-help. Macfarlane’s Witchcraft in Tudor and Stuart Essex offers a similar argument. In it, he suggests that witchcraft was the means through which neighbors, in a society founded on Christian communal values, transitioned to publicly dealing with conflict. In this worldview, a witch would inflict harm on her victim for his “unneighbourly behavior”—for example, denying her the sale of a pig or refusing her a loan. Macfarlane at 92.

Though neither account is implausible, and perhaps each helps account for some of the accusations, it is difficult to imagine such a widespread phenomenon, at its most basic level, driven on unaired social tensions. In a way, these accounts undermine the fantastic fervor, whether real, imagined, or fluffed up with which witchcraft manifested:

Year after year inflammatory books and sermons warned the Christian public of the danger, urged the Christian magistrate to greater vigilance, greater persecution. Confessors and judges were supplied with manuals incorporating all the latest information, village hatreds were exploited in order to ensure exposure, torture was used to extract and expand confessions, and lenient judges were denounced as enemies of the people of God, drowsy guardians of the beleaguered citadel. Trevor-Roper at 96.

Though, of course, one ought to question such accounts of social life in early modern England, Trevor-Roper’s incredible description helps shed light on the complexity of the circumstance. Although Thomas and Macfarlane’s arguments that deteriorating social relations between the community’s well-to-do and the poor precipitated accusations of witchcraft are persuasive, these evaluations create a not so insignificant ideological vacuum. Perhaps these tensions laid the foundation, but what else made up the “witch-craze”?

Although it is useful to explain the role that witchcraft played in society, it is equally important to recognize that, whether or not witches could fly on brooms, the belief in the occult was real. For this reason, the legal system was used to intervene in, make sense of, and account for witchcraft. For its part, witchcraft helped to explain those misfortunes that happened in everyday life, or, as Geertz put it, “when ordinary expectations fail[ed] to hold… the cry of witchcraft [went] up.” Common Sense as a Cultural System, at 11.

Perhaps their meanings and origins may differ, the witches of early modern England played a similar role as those in the lives of the Zande people of north central Africa. In Common Sense as a Cultural System, Geertz provides an example of the Zande people’s common sense system, which includes witchcraft, illustrative for trying to understand its purpose in society. When walking along, Geertz explained, a Zande boy might hit his foot against a tree stump. Rather than recognize his own carelessness, he’ll declare, “I did look where I was going; you have to with so many stumps about…and if I hadn’t been witched I would have seen it.” Geertz, Common Sense as a Cultural System, at 10. The details of what and who is a witch are different, but her purpose is the same—to give justification to why things changed for the worse.

Similarly, George Clifford, writing in 1587, illustrated how a witch accusation would arise after injury. The previously healthy English man would account for his unexpected decline in health in some formulation of the following:

Some woman doth fal out bitterly with her neighbour: there followeth some great hurt, either that God hath permitted the devil to vex him: or otherwise. There is a suspicion conceived. Within fewe yeares after shee is in some iarre with an other. Hee is also plagued. This is noted of all. Great fame is spread of the matter. Mother W is a witch. She hath bewitched goodman B. Two hogges which died strangely: or else hee is taken lame. As quoted in Macfarlane at 91.

Though critical of the accusations, this account illustrates the ways in which witchcraft provided the community with an explanation of what was happening in their lives. Paradoxically, as Geertz suggests, “[f]or all the talk about its flying in the night like a firefly, witchcraft doesn’t celebrate an unseen order, it certifies a seen one.” Geertz, Common Sense as a Cultural System, at 11. Though the prosecution of witchcraft emerged from intellectual developments in the field of demonology, the common people, good Christians as they may have been, were not so much concerned with the devilish pact but with the effects they felt through the offenses of others—the witches.

CONCLUSION

Though literature and law may seem wildly different, through witchcraft it is evident that neither is immune culture—even the popular one. Like the weird sisters, whether witches were the cause or a symptom of the evil that existed in the world and afflicted the lives of common men, they were certainly representative of it.

 
Deleted:
<
<
Keith Thomas and Alan Macfarlane have both offered valuable insight into the function of witchcraft in early modern society. In The Relevance of Social Anthropology to the Historical Study of English Witchcraft, Thomas suggests that witch accusations helped alleviate the pressures—whether of social, moral, and/or religious guilt—that afflicted community members as English society moved away from reliance on private charity for care of the poor to [governmental and individualistic ideas of self-help]. Macfarlane’s Witchcraft in Tudor and Stuart Essex offers a similar argument. In it, he suggests that witchcraft was the means through which neighbors, in a society founded on Christian communal values, transitioned to publicly dealing with conflict. In this worldview, a witch would inflict harm on her victim for his “unneighbourly behavior”—for example, denying her the sale of a pig or refusing her a loan. Macfarlane at 92.
 
Changed:
<
<
Though neither of their account is implausible, and perhaps it helps account for some of the accusations, it is difficult to imagine such a widespread phenomenon, at its most basic level, driven on unaired social tensions. In a way, these accounts undermine the fantastic fervor, whether real or imagined, with which witchcraft manifested:
>
>
  • Malcolm Gaskill, Witchcraft, Politics, and Memory in Seventeenth-Century England, 50 The Historical Journal 289 (2007).
  • Malcolm Gaskill, 2008 Witchcraft and Evidence in Early Modern England, PAST & PRESENT 33.
  • Clifford Geertz, Common Sense as a Cultural System, 33 Antioch R 5 (1975).
  • CLIFFORD GEERTZ, Local Knowledge: Fact and Law in Comparative Perspective, in LOCAL KNOWLEDGE: FURTHER ESSAYS IN INTERPRETIVE ANTHROPOLOGY 167 (1983).
  • MARION GIBSON, WITCHCRAFT AND SOCIETY IN ENGLAND AND AMERICA, 1550-1750, (Marion Gibson ed., 2003).
  • CARLO GINZBURG, ECSTASIES: DECIPHERING THE WITCHES’ SABBATH (Raymond Rosenthal trans., 1991).
  • Alan Macfarlane, Witchcraft in Tudor and Stuart Essex, in WITCHCRAFT CONFESSIONS AND ACCUSATIONS 47 (Mary Douglas ed., 2013).
  • WILLIAM SHAKESPEARE, MACBETH (1606?), reprinted in WITCHCRAFT AND SOCIETY IN ENGLAND AND AMERICA, 1550-1750, 114 (Marion Gibson ed., 2003).
  • JAMES SHARPE, INSTRUMENTS OF DARKNESS: WITCHCRAFT IN ENGLAND 1550-1750 (1996).
  • Keith Thomas, The Relevance of Social Anthropology to the Historical Study of English Witchcraft, in WITCHCRAFT CONFESSIONS AND ACCUSATIONS 81 (Mary Douglas ed., 2013).
  • KEITH THOMAS, RELIGION AND THE DECLINE OF MAGIC (1971).
  • H.R. TREVOR-ROPER, THE EUROPEAN WITCH-CRAZE OF THE SIXTEENTH AND SEVENTEENTH CENTURIES (1969).
 
Deleted:
<
<
Year after year inflammatory books and sermons warned the Christian public of the danger, urged the Christian magistrate to greater vigilance, greater persecution. Confessors and judges were supplied with manuals incorporating all the latest information, village hatreds were exploited in order to ensure exposure, torture was used to extract and expand confessions, and lenient judges were denounced as enemies of the people of God, drowsy guardians of the beleaguered citadel. Trevor-Roper at 96.
 
Deleted:
<
<
Though, of course, we ought to question such accounts of social life in early modern England, Trevor-Roper’s incredible description helps shed light on the complexity of the circumstance.
 
Deleted:
<
<
Although Thomas and Macfarlane’s analyses arguing that deteriorating social relations between the community’s well-to-do and the poor precipitated accusations of witchcraft are persuasive, these evaluations create a not insignificant ideological vacuum. Perhaps these tensions laid the foundation, but what else made up the “witch-craze”?
 
META FILEATTACHMENT attachment="Witchcraft_Outline.docx" attr="" comment="" date="1573099471" name="Witchcraft_Outline.docx" path="Witchcraft Outline.docx" size="27551" stream="Witchcraft Outline.docx" user="Main.IsraelRodriguezRubio" version="1"

OnWitchraft 5 - 05 Dec 2019 - Main.IsraelRodriguezRubio
Line: 1 to 1
 
META TOPICPARENT name="ArticlesInProcess"
Changed:
<
<
The Community's Peace: Witchcraft, Popular Culture, and the Law during the Early Modern Period
>
>
The Community's Peace: Witchcraft, Popular Culture, and the Law during the Early Modern Period
 “[I]n the case of Witch-Craft many things are very difficult, hidden, and infolded in mists and clouds, over-shadowing our reason and best understanding.”
Line: 8 to 8
 
Changed:
<
<
INTRODUCTION
>
>
INTRODUCTION
  William Shakespeare’s Macbeth begins, not with the play’s namesake, but with a meeting of three witches at night. Under the cloak of darkness, the “weird sisters” gather to plan out their encounter with Macbeth. The play, written and performed around the turn of the 17th century, is one of the longest-lasting and most popular depictions of witchcraft. Though not main characters themselves (their names are but “First Witch,” “Second Witch,” and “Third Witch”), they are central to the unraveling of the plot. Marion Gibson notes that “with their economical, rhythmic and riddling speeches,” the weird sisters “create in a few short scenes an oppressive atmosphere of evil and mystery which blights the whole play.” Gibson at 112.
Line: 22 to 22
  On some level, a basic one perhaps, witchcraft helped explain the reason why events, many of them tragic or unfortunate, occurred—why bad things happened to the supposed good people of the community. Though Trevor-Roper has called witchcraft persecution “[t]he rubbish of the human mind,” and he, in certain respects, is not wrong, it is also worth exploring the socio-cultural beliefs that made a belief in witchcraft real. Trevor-Roper at 97. As Carlo Ginzburg explores in Ecstasies, witchcraft persecution, with the witches’ sabbath at the center, emerges from a history of scapegoating in continental Europe. In this vein, common beliefs and imaginations were critical to the prosecution of witchcraft. Gaskill suggests that “no social, economic, religious or cultural facts shaped the history of English witchcraft more.” Gaskill, Witchcraft and Evidence, at 39. For a conviction of witchcraft to stand—that is, for the evidence to prove successful it had to convince the people of the community; it had to make sense of their lives.
Changed:
<
<
SETTING THE STAGE
>
>
SETTING THE STAGE
  The prosecution of witches in England materialized during the early modern period. By the sixteenth century, the belief in the existence of witchcraft was a common one and the belief in dark magic was regarded as “the logical corollary of the equally widespread possibility in the belief of beneficent magic.” Thomas at 437. Though the beliefs in dark magic “were as old as human history, and in no sense peculiarly English,” during the late Middle Ages, Christianity began to distinguish this type of magic from the unharmful kind. Thomas at 438. Among the intellectual class, what resulted was demonology, which constructed a new way of seeing the world from the old beliefs. Trevor-Roper at 91. As such, though witchcraft was ascribed to “virtually every kind of magical activity or ritual operation that worked by occult methods,” Thomas, in Douglas, at 48, it came to be regarded as the “supernatural activity, believed to be the result of power given by the Devil, and causing physical damage….” McFarlane? , in Douglas, at 82.
Changed:
<
<
In practice, the ways in which witchcraft mattered to English society differed between the learned classes and the rest of society. Whereas theologians and others who studied witchcraft were concerned with Devil-worshipping, a heretical practice, the “uneducated populace” was more concerned with the damage that these evil creatures caused to persons and property within the community—those experiences which they could feel and to which they fell victim at times. See Thomas, in Douglas, at 48-49; Sparke.
>
>
In practice, the ways in which witchcraft mattered to English society differed between the learned classes and the rest of society. Whereas theologians and others who studied witchcraft were concerned with Devil-worshipping, a heretical practice, the “uneducated populace” was more concerned with the damage that these evil creatures caused to persons and property within the community—those experiences which they could feel and to which they fell victim at times. See Thomas, in Douglas, at 48-49; Sharpe.
  Witchcraft rarely occurred among family members (except perhaps in cases of bewitched husbands or magical acts to induce marriage) and, as a result, was treated as more of a communal problem. Macfarlane at 87. As such, witches of the bad sort were really those who “afflict[ed] their neighbours and others with misfortune, sickness, and death, and who also practise[d] a range of ungodly magical rites in the community.” Marion, Intro at x. From these definitions, we can gather that witches accused of wrongdoing did not practice their craft silently. Rather, she was one who exposed her community to the evils which she possessed and with which she disturbed the community’s peace.

Line: 36 to 36
  As indicated, little remains of the thoughts and beliefs of those accusers, but far less remains of the unmitigated thoughts and beliefs of those accused of witchcraft. Though much is speculated about the minds of the accusers, far less is known about the accused. Gaskill notes, if merely in passing, “Most suspects were marginal women whose confessions reflected the misery of hardship, anxiety of moral guilt, and fear of damnation.” Gaskill at 53. Though the outcome of these cases largely turned on what the accused confessed to, we can discern far less about what they thought, even from their supposed own words. As Geertz has remarked, “Men, of course, can lie, and, especially in the presence of judges, often do....” Geertz at 189.
Changed:
<
<
PULLING BACK THE CURTAIN
>
>
PULLING BACK THE CURTAIN
 
Added:
>
>
What is perhaps most readily striking in the prosecution of witchcraft is the process of law in the making: its effort to find and form some sort of relation—whether of alignment or power over or something else—with the community and its values. This is perhaps part of what Geertz meant when he wrote that “the ‘law’ side of things is not a bounded set of norms, rules, principles, values, or whatever from which jural responses to distilled events can be drawn, but part of a distinctive manner of imagining the real.” Geertz at xxxx (Local Knowledge). Through witchcraft, the beliefs from above—whether intellectual, divinely ordered, or both—merged with the lived experiences and beliefs of those below. In this, we see a process that is not neat or orderly but constantly in flux and struggling to make sense of relations between the people in the community and their systems.
 
Added:
>
>
Keith Thomas and Alan Macfarlane have both offered valuable insight into the function of witchcraft in early modern society. In The Relevance of Social Anthropology to the Historical Study of English Witchcraft, Thomas suggests that witch accusations helped alleviate the pressures—whether of social, moral, and/or religious guilt—that afflicted community members as English society moved away from reliance on private charity for care of the poor to [governmental and individualistic ideas of self-help]. Macfarlane’s Witchcraft in Tudor and Stuart Essex offers a similar argument. In it, he suggests that witchcraft was the means through which neighbors, in a society founded on Christian communal values, transitioned to publicly dealing with conflict. In this worldview, a witch would inflict harm on her victim for his “unneighbourly behavior”—for example, denying her the sale of a pig or refusing her a loan. Macfarlane at 92.

Though neither of their account is implausible, and perhaps it helps account for some of the accusations, it is difficult to imagine such a widespread phenomenon, at its most basic level, driven on unaired social tensions. In a way, these accounts undermine the fantastic fervor, whether real or imagined, with which witchcraft manifested:

Year after year inflammatory books and sermons warned the Christian public of the danger, urged the Christian magistrate to greater vigilance, greater persecution. Confessors and judges were supplied with manuals incorporating all the latest information, village hatreds were exploited in order to ensure exposure, torture was used to extract and expand confessions, and lenient judges were denounced as enemies of the people of God, drowsy guardians of the beleaguered citadel. Trevor-Roper at 96.

Though, of course, we ought to question such accounts of social life in early modern England, Trevor-Roper’s incredible description helps shed light on the complexity of the circumstance.

Although Thomas and Macfarlane’s analyses arguing that deteriorating social relations between the community’s well-to-do and the poor precipitated accusations of witchcraft are persuasive, these evaluations create a not insignificant ideological vacuum. Perhaps these tensions laid the foundation, but what else made up the “witch-craze”?

 
META FILEATTACHMENT attachment="Witchcraft_Outline.docx" attr="" comment="" date="1573099471" name="Witchcraft_Outline.docx" path="Witchcraft Outline.docx" size="27551" stream="Witchcraft Outline.docx" user="Main.IsraelRodriguezRubio" version="1"

OnWitchraft 4 - 05 Dec 2019 - Main.IsraelRodriguezRubio
Line: 1 to 1
 
META TOPICPARENT name="ArticlesInProcess"
The Community's Peace: Witchcraft, Popular Culture, and the Law during the Early Modern Period
Line: 33 to 33
  As to the actual evidence introduced, confessions, whether forced or otherwise obtained, “unnatural” body marks, and witness testimony became popular methods to substantiate the accusations of witchcraft. The records that remain of the processes are troublesome: not just because they are few but also because it is difficult to extract from them what the accused believed. Confessions should be analyzed with a healthy degree of skepticism as evidence of the accused’s actual beliefs. After all, demonologists and witch hunters advocated the use of trickery and false promises of leniency to extract confessions “from those who [were] obviously guilt but [would] not say so.” Gibson at 25. Though judicial torture was formally disallowed in England (unlike continental Europe and Scotland), it sometimes made its way into witch investigations by way of sleep deprivation and ordeals, such as “swimming a witch.” Witch hunters, like Matthew Hopkins, used these practices that verged on torture to obtain confessions. Hopkins, for example, popularized the use of “dunking” and “walking” the witch as means to extract confessions during the period of the Civil War.
Changed:
<
<
As indicated, little remains of the thoughts and beliefs of those accusers, but far is less remains of the unmitigated thoughts and beliefs of those accused of witchcraft. Though much is speculated about the minds of the accusers, far less is known about the accused. Gaskill notes, if merely in passing, “most suspects were marginal women whose confessions reflected the misery of hardship, anxiety of moral guilt, and fear of damnation.” Gaskill at 53. Thomas hints of similar circumstances in theorizing as to the origin. Ironically, though the cases hung on what the accused confessed to, we know less about what they thought.
>
>
As indicated, little remains of the thoughts and beliefs of those accusers, but far less remains of the unmitigated thoughts and beliefs of those accused of witchcraft. Though much is speculated about the minds of the accusers, far less is known about the accused. Gaskill notes, if merely in passing, “Most suspects were marginal women whose confessions reflected the misery of hardship, anxiety of moral guilt, and fear of damnation.” Gaskill at 53. Though the outcome of these cases largely turned on what the accused confessed to, we can discern far less about what they thought, even from their supposed own words. As Geertz has remarked, “Men, of course, can lie, and, especially in the presence of judges, often do....” Geertz at 189.
 

PULLING BACK THE CURTAIN


OnWitchraft 3 - 03 Dec 2019 - Main.IsraelRodriguezRubio
Line: 1 to 1
 
META TOPICPARENT name="ArticlesInProcess"
Changed:
<
<
The Community's Peace: Witchcraft, Popular Culture, and the Law, xxxx-xxxx
>
>
The Community's Peace: Witchcraft, Popular Culture, and the Law during the Early Modern Period
 
Changed:
<
<
  • "And beneath the surface of an ever more sophisticated society what dark passions and inflammable credulities do we find, sometimes accidentally released, sometimes deliberately mobilized!"
>
>
“[I]n the case of Witch-Craft many things are very difficult, hidden, and infolded in mists and clouds, over-shadowing our reason and best understanding.”
John Cotta, The Triall of Witch-Craft (1616)
 
Changed:
<
<
  • "All Christendom, it seems, is at the mercy of these horrifying creatures."
>
>
 
Added:
>
>
INTRODUCTION
 
Changed:
<
<
Ideas to consider:
>
>
William Shakespeare’s Macbeth begins, not with the play’s namesake, but with a meeting of three witches at night. Under the cloak of darkness, the “weird sisters” gather to plan out their encounter with Macbeth. The play, written and performed around the turn of the 17th century, is one of the longest-lasting and most popular depictions of witchcraft. Though not main characters themselves (their names are but “First Witch,” “Second Witch,” and “Third Witch”), they are central to the unraveling of the plot. Marion Gibson notes that “with their economical, rhythmic and riddling speeches,” the weird sisters “create in a few short scenes an oppressive atmosphere of evil and mystery which blights the whole play.” Gibson at 112.
 
Changed:
<
<
  • What are the objectives of criminal law at this time?
  • Is restoration an objective? And if so, what is the law the restoring and to whom?
  • What is the law of evidence at this time?
>
>
Just like the three witches in the play, however, little is known about the witches they intended to imitate in real life. Theorizing their purpose in the play, Gibson notes a doubt left unanswered: “Attention is directed towards the source of evil, but nothing is revealed [about them] and the audience and readers, like the characters, are left unsatisfied.” Gibson at 112. Gibson’s analysis veers in the direction of attempting to explain the inspiration for the witch characters (likely a blend of Scottish and English references to indulge the King and audience, she notes). Id. Though modern readers of Shakespeare know very little, presumably, about the witches, how much did the audience at the time of the play’s development know? How did they relate to the characters (and what about the real witches)? After all, at the time of the play’s creation and performance, witchcraft was considered real by many—and a crime at that.
 
Added:
>
>
-- My intent in this paper is to explore some of the reasons why early Modern English people convicted others of witchcraft. Much is written on the evidence used to convict these women, for they were primarily women, of evil-doing but much less is known as to the reasons why the common belief allowed such an outcome. This, of course, is a far more complicated question with few definitive or satisfactory answers. Reaching the thoughts and beliefs of the common people is a difficult task to undertake. For one, what has passed on in time of common beliefs, much like the words of the weird sisters, has been facilitated through the mouths and memories of others(actors in real life, if you will). Most common people, after all, could not read or write. Additionally, the sources from which we can divine the common understanding of witchcraft are largely biased: the court sources, in the form of records and the writings of educated observers, and demonological tracts, written by theologians. Sharpe at 58.
 
Added:
>
>
Left with few historical records, this papers reaches some of these questions by attempting to understand the cultural life which the witches and their accusers inhabited. My original inquiry into how witchcraft, again a crime, was proved at trial necessarily leads to the question of the state of mind of those on whom the conviction hung: the lay jurors. I use the anthropological writings, heavily borrowing from Clifford Geertz on common sense and the law, to arrive at some of the answers and to think through some other proposed suggestions.
 
Changed:
<
<
  • "The light [of advancement] continually, if irregularly, gains at the expense of darkness"
  • In terms of witch hunts, "[t]he years 1550-1600 were worse than the years 1500-1550, and the years 1600-1650 were worse still."
  • "For in the Dark Age there was at least no witch-craze. There were witch-beliefs, of course—a scattered folk-lore of peasant superstitions: the casting of spells, the making of storms, converse with spirits, sympathetic magic….I am concerned with the organized, systematic ‘demonology’ which the medieval Church constructed out of those beliefs and which, in the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries, acquired a terrible momentum of its own"
  • "We cannot see the long persistence and even aggravation of the witch-craze merely as a necessary effect of clerical domination, or its dissolution as the logical consequence of release from religious fundamentalism"
  • "Isolated rural societies anywhere—in the dreary flats of the Landes in Frances, or of Essex in England, or in the sandy plain of north Germany—would always be subject to witch-beliefs…Individual inquisitors, too, would discover or create beliefs in any area in which they happened to operate: Krämer and Sprenger would have plenty of counterparts among the Protestant clergy—and among them laity too, like Matthew Hopkins, the famous ‘witch-finder general’ of the English civil war."
  • The question is not " ‘why people believed in witchcraft,’ but rather, ‘who witchcraft functioned for, once the basic assumptions about the nature of evil, the types of causation, and the origins of supernatural ‘power’ were present.’" (Ginzburg at 3)
>
>
On some level, a basic one perhaps, witchcraft helped explain the reason why events, many of them tragic or unfortunate, occurred—why bad things happened to the supposed good people of the community. Though Trevor-Roper has called witchcraft persecution “[t]he rubbish of the human mind,” and he, in certain respects, is not wrong, it is also worth exploring the socio-cultural beliefs that made a belief in witchcraft real. Trevor-Roper at 97. As Carlo Ginzburg explores in Ecstasies, witchcraft persecution, with the witches’ sabbath at the center, emerges from a history of scapegoating in continental Europe. In this vein, common beliefs and imaginations were critical to the prosecution of witchcraft. Gaskill suggests that “no social, economic, religious or cultural facts shaped the history of English witchcraft more.” Gaskill, Witchcraft and Evidence, at 39. For a conviction of witchcraft to stand—that is, for the evidence to prove successful it had to convince the people of the community; it had to make sense of their lives.
 
Changed:
<
<
WITCHCRAFT AND SOCIETY
  • "Since a system was presupposed, a system was found."
  • "Magic is thus, like desire, ambivalent from the start: it may provide protection for a society, but it also suggests the existence of the need for protection."
  • Consider the conditions in place that require communities to protect themsel
  • "Year after year inflammatory books and sermons warned the Christian public of the danger, urged the Christian magistrate to greater vigilance, greater persecution. Confessors and judges were supplied with manuals incorporating all the latest information, village hatreds were exploited in order to ensure exposure, torture was used to extract and expand confessions, and lenient judges were denounced as enemies of the people of God, drowsy guardians of the beleaguered citadel"
>
>
SETTING THE STAGE
 
Changed:
<
<
The Common Belief:
  • "the witches’ sabat would become [93] an objective fact, disbelieved only…by those of unsound mind; and the ingenuity of churchmen and lawyers would be taxed to explain away that inconvenient text of canon law, the canon Episcopi."
  • "Laymen might not accept all of the esoteric details supplied by the experts, but they accepted the general truth of the theory, and because they accepted its general truth, they were unable to argue against its more learned interpreters. So the experts effectively commanded the field."
  • "But once the mythology had been established, it acquired, as it were, a reality of its own. Ideology is indivisible, and those who believed that there were devil-worshipping societies in the mountains soon discovered that there were devil-worshipping individuals in the plains."
>
>
The prosecution of witches in England materialized during the early modern period. By the sixteenth century, the belief in the existence of witchcraft was a common one and the belief in dark magic was regarded as “the logical corollary of the equally widespread possibility in the belief of beneficent magic.” Thomas at 437. Though the beliefs in dark magic “were as old as human history, and in no sense peculiarly English,” during the late Middle Ages, Christianity began to distinguish this type of magic from the unharmful kind. Thomas at 438. Among the intellectual class, what resulted was demonology, which constructed a new way of seeing the world from the old beliefs. Trevor-Roper at 91. As such, though witchcraft was ascribed to “virtually every kind of magical activity or ritual operation that worked by occult methods,” Thomas, in Douglas, at 48, it came to be regarded as the “supernatural activity, believed to be the result of power given by the Devil, and causing physical damage….” McFarlane? , in Douglas, at 82. In practice, the ways in which witchcraft mattered to English society differed between the learned classes and the rest of society. Whereas theologians and others who studied witchcraft were concerned with Devil-worshipping, a heretical practice, the “uneducated populace” was more concerned with the damage that these evil creatures caused to persons and property within the community—those experiences which they could feel and to which they fell victim at times. See Thomas, in Douglas, at 48-49; Sparke.
 
Added:
>
>
Witchcraft rarely occurred among family members (except perhaps in cases of bewitched husbands or magical acts to induce marriage) and, as a result, was treated as more of a communal problem. Macfarlane at 87. As such, witches of the bad sort were really those who “afflict[ed] their neighbours and others with misfortune, sickness, and death, and who also practise[d] a range of ungodly magical rites in the community.” Marion, Intro at x. From these definitions, we can gather that witches accused of wrongdoing did not practice their craft silently. Rather, she was one who exposed her community to the evils which she possessed and with which she disturbed the community’s peace.
 
Changed:
<
<
TIME FRAME
  • "The middle of the seventeenth century was a period of revolutions in Europe"
  • "There is the Puritan Revolution in England which fills the twenty years between 1640 and 1660, but whose crisis was between 1648 and 1653."
  • "For a generation they had felt it coming. Ever since 1618 at least there had been talk of the dissolution of society, or of the world; and the undefined sense of gloom of which we are constantly aware in those years was justified sometimes by new interpretation of Scripture, sometime by new phenomena in the skies."
  • "It is as if a series of rainstorms has ended in one final thunderstorm which has cleared the air and changed, permanently, the temperature of Europe"
>
>
In the courtroom, witchcraft was treated as an “anti-social crime” rather than heresy. Court records suggest that most prosecutions were provoked by accusations of damage to persons and property in the community rather than worshipping with the Devil. Thomas at 443. Unlike theologians, witch finders were not as interested in “the mechanics of the operation than in the fact of the witch’s malice.” Thomas, in Douglas, at 51. Though proving either strand of the crime would seem like an uphill battle by modern evidentiary standards, the law of evidence, though in its development at the time, was not yet in place during the early modern period.
 
Added:
>
>
As to the actual evidence introduced, confessions, whether forced or otherwise obtained, “unnatural” body marks, and witness testimony became popular methods to substantiate the accusations of witchcraft. The records that remain of the processes are troublesome: not just because they are few but also because it is difficult to extract from them what the accused believed. Confessions should be analyzed with a healthy degree of skepticism as evidence of the accused’s actual beliefs. After all, demonologists and witch hunters advocated the use of trickery and false promises of leniency to extract confessions “from those who [were] obviously guilt but [would] not say so.” Gibson at 25. Though judicial torture was formally disallowed in England (unlike continental Europe and Scotland), it sometimes made its way into witch investigations by way of sleep deprivation and ordeals, such as “swimming a witch.” Witch hunters, like Matthew Hopkins, used these practices that verged on torture to obtain confessions. Hopkins, for example, popularized the use of “dunking” and “walking” the witch as means to extract confessions during the period of the Civil War.
 
Added:
>
>
As indicated, little remains of the thoughts and beliefs of those accusers, but far is less remains of the unmitigated thoughts and beliefs of those accused of witchcraft. Though much is speculated about the minds of the accusers, far less is known about the accused. Gaskill notes, if merely in passing, “most suspects were marginal women whose confessions reflected the misery of hardship, anxiety of moral guilt, and fear of damnation.” Gaskill at 53. Thomas hints of similar circumstances in theorizing as to the origin. Ironically, though the cases hung on what the accused confessed to, we know less about what they thought.
 
Deleted:
<
<
WHO ARE WITCHES?/WHAT DO WITCHES DO?
  • "The basic evidence of the kingdom of God had been supplied by Revelation. But the Father of Lies had not revealed himself so openly. To penetrate the secrets of his kingdom, it was therefore necessary to rely on indirect sources. These sources could only be captured members of the enemy intelligence service: in other words, confessing witches."
 
Changed:
<
<
A transition from witch-belief to witchcraft
  • "…the essential substance of the new demonology—the pact with Satan, the witches’ sabbat, the carnal intercourse with demons, etc., etc.—and the hierarchical, systematic structure of the kingdom of the Devil, are independent product of the later Middle Ages"
  • "At a popular level every kind of magical activity, including any unacceptable brand of religion, might be lumped together under the blanket title of ‘witchcraft’, and there was no special term to indicate maleficent magicians."
  • "Nevertheless, it is possible to isolate that kind of ‘witchcraft’ which involved the employment (or presumed employment) of some occult means of doing harm to other people in a way which was generally disapproved of."
>
>
PULLING BACK THE CURTAIN
 
Deleted:
<
<
What is a witch in 17th century England?
  • "A witch was a person of either sex (but more often female) who could mysteriously injure other people"
  • Discourse on the Damned Art of Witchcraft (1608) (suggesting that women, as the weaker sex, were more prone to the "devil’s illusions")
  • By the sixteenth century, the belief in the existence of witchcraft was common. It was regarded as "the logical corollary of the equally widespread possibility in the belief of beneficent magic."
  • Thomas contends that "witch-beliefs of [the maleficent] kind were as old as human history, and in no sense peculiarly English" and that, during the late Middle Ages, a new element distinguished this type of witchcraft from that of past primitive peoples: Christianity.
 "In return for her promise of allegiance, she was thought to have been given the means of wreaking supernatural vengeance upon her enemies. Seen from this new point of view, the essence of witchcraft was not the damage it did to other persons, but its heretical character—devil-worship."
  • "Not witches riding brooms, nor kissing the devil’s behind, nor cannibalizing babies—but simple maleficium characterized English witchcraft."
  • "Maleficium is the damage that he might to do: this would take the form of injuring or killing someone or causing harm to their property—such as killing or injuring livestock or frustrating the production of goods."
  • "The witch could exercise her power through physical contact, either touching the victim or emanating power from her eyes (in which case, the victim is said to have been ‘fascinated’ or ‘overlooked’), or pronounce a verbal curse (in which case, the victim was ‘forspoken’)."
  • "Whether or not the witch injured other people, she deserved to die for her disloyalty to God."
  • "It was common-place medieval theology to assert that any magical activity, however beneficent in intention, necessarily involved a tacit compact wit the Devil, and should therefore be punished."
 
Deleted:
<
<
TRIAL OF WITCHES Substance:
  • Three Acts of Parliament on witchcraft:
  • 1542 (repealed in 1547), 33 Hen. Viii, cap. 8 (repealed by I Edw. vi, cap. 12)
 "In 1542 it was made a felony (and therefore a capital offence) to conjure spirits or to practise witchcraft, enchantment or sorcery, in order to find treasure; to waste or destroy a person’s body, limbs, or goods; or ‘for any other unlawful intent or purpose’."  "this Act clearly treated the crime of witchcraft as consisting in positive acts of hostility to the community, rather than in relations with the Devil as such."
  • 1563 (repealed 1604), 5 Eliz., cap. 16;
 "It was more severe than its predecessor, in that it made it a felony to invoke evil spirits for any purpose whatsoever, whether maleficium was involved or not. But it was also more lenient, in that witchcraft…[was] deemed [a] capital felon[y] only if [it actually resulted in the death of a human victim."
  • 1604 (repealed 1736), I Jac. I, c. 12 (repealed by 9 Geo. Ii, cap. 5)
 "the full continental doctrine" taking effect.  Included the previous felony categories. "It furthermore declared it to be felony if the victim was only injured; and it replaced life imprisonment by death as the penalty for a second offence in the case of lesser kinds of magic"… "to ‘consult, covenant with, entertain, employ, feed, or reward any evil and wicked spirit to or for any intent or purpose.’"
  • The Act of 1604 "represented the furthest point to which the English law on witchcraft was adapted to fit continental doctrines. For it meant that evidence of relationship with evil spirits or animal familiar was technically sufficient to secure the judicial condemnation of an accused person, regardless of whether or not he or she had harmed anyone."
  • "the evidence of the statute-book, taken as a whole, suggests that in England witchcraft was prosecuted primarily as an anti-social crime, rather than as a heresy"
  • "This impression is confirmed by the records of the trials. In practice, most prosecutions were provoked by alleged acts of damage against other persons and seldom drew on allegations of devil-worship."

Process (evidence, torture, etc.) [Broadly, what were the rights afforded to ∆s at trial? What was the trial process like? How did these rights differ from those afforded to witches?]

  • Contract with the Devil: "No reference in a trial to an oral compact with the Devil is recorded before 1612; and not until the investigations of Matthew Hopkins, the professional witch-finder who was active in the late 1640s, was there sworn evidence testifying to a written covenant"
  • For other examples (i.e., sabbath, sexual assault, flying), see Thomas at 445.
  • Body marks: "The one common feature of English witch-trials which does indicate some sort of association in the popular mind…was the notion that the witch bore on her body the mark of her profession in the form of a spot or excresence, which could be discovered by searching her for an ‘unnatural’ mark, usually recognisable because it would not bleed when pricked and was insensible to pain."
  • "The witch’s mark was sometimes thought of as a teat from which the familiar [an animal] could suck the witch’s blood as a form of nourishment. IT thus became a common procedure in witch-detection to isolate the suspect and wait for some animal or insect to appear as proof of her guilt"
  • "Familiars gained a recognized place in witch-accusations at an early stage"

The Confession: Use of Torture

  • "…England alone escaped from the judicial use of torture in ordinary criminal [119] cases, including cases of witchcraft."
  • But "[t]here was also some non-judicial torture in ill-regulated cases: e.g. during the civil wars, when Matthew Hopkins and his assistant used the tortmentum imsomniae."
  • However, according to T-R, torture alone is insufficient to explain "why even in England, where there was no judicial torture, witches confessed to absurd crimes; why the people were so docile in the face of such mania; and above all, why some of the most original and cultivated men of the time not only accepted the theory of witchcraft, but positively devoted their genius to its propagation."
  • "What was ‘subjective reality’ to the penitent was ‘objective reality’ to the confessor. Out of those fragments of truth, spontaneously given if amplified by suggestion or torture, a total picture of Satan’s kingdom could, by logic, by the ‘rationalism’ of the time, be built up."
  • Trial of Alison Device (Pendle witches, 1612)
  • [Perhaps the confession serves as a way to do God’s work against Satan. Internalized self-regulation?]

Comparative Perspective

  • Malleus Maleficarum advocated the use of torture if other means proved unsatisfactory
  • Continental use of torture
  • "Judicial torture had been allowed, in limited cases, by Roman law; but Roman law, and with it judicial torture, had been forgotten in the Dark Ages."
  • Returned in the eleventh century.
  • Eventually judges would sometimes disallow testimony because "they knew that it had been created by tortured and was therefore unreliable"
  • Discussing Scottish and continental witch trials: "For such a crime, the ordinary rules of evidence, as the ordinary limits of torture, were suspended. For how could ordinary methods prove such extraordinary crimes?"
  • "So, in the absence of ‘a grave indicium’…circumstantial evidence was sufficient to mobilize the process."

The End of Witch-hunting

  • "By the 1680s the battle is effectively won, at least in the west."
  • "The rubbish of the human mind which for two centuries, by some process of intellectual alchemy and social pressure, had become fused together in a coherent, explosive system, has disintegrated. It is rubbish again."

-- IsraelRodriguezRubio - 07 Nov 2019

This is a good beginning. You have laid out an outline of discussion, and you have pointed to quotations from secondary sources you intend to use. But we don't yet know what your thesis is: what question you are answering, and how your answer develops from the materials. Your "ideas to consider" are well-chosen, but we don't yet know how your considering works out. Definitely a sound basis. Onward.

 
META FILEATTACHMENT attachment="Witchcraft_Outline.docx" attr="" comment="" date="1573099471" name="Witchcraft_Outline.docx" path="Witchcraft Outline.docx" size="27551" stream="Witchcraft Outline.docx" user="Main.IsraelRodriguezRubio" version="1"

OnWitchraft 2 - 14 Nov 2019 - Main.EbenMoglen
Line: 1 to 1
 
META TOPICPARENT name="ArticlesInProcess"
Changed:
<
<
The Community’s Peace: Witchcraft, Popular Culture, and the Law, xxxx-xxxx
>
>
The Community's Peace: Witchcraft, Popular Culture, and the Law, xxxx-xxxx
 
Changed:
<
<
• “And beneath the surface of an ever more sophisticated society what dark passions and inflammable credulities do we find, sometimes accidentally released, sometimes deliberately mobilized!”
>
>
  • "And beneath the surface of an ever more sophisticated society what dark passions and inflammable credulities do we find, sometimes accidentally released, sometimes deliberately mobilized!"
 
Changed:
<
<
• “All Christendom, it seems, is at the mercy of these horrifying creatures.”
>
>
  • "All Christendom, it seems, is at the mercy of these horrifying creatures."
 

Ideas to consider:

Deleted:
<
<
• What are the objectives of criminal law at this time? o Is restoration an objective? And if so, what is the law the restoring and to whom? • What is the law of evidence at this time?
 
Added:
>
>
  • What are the objectives of criminal law at this time?
  • Is restoration an objective? And if so, what is the law the restoring and to whom?
  • What is the law of evidence at this time?
 
Changed:
<
<
• “The light [of advancement] continually, if irregularly, gains at the expense of darkness” • In terms of witch hunts, “[t]he years 1550-1600 were worse than the years 1500-1550, and the years 1600-1650 were worse still.” o “For in the Dark Age there was at least no witch-craze. There were witch-beliefs, of course—a scattered folk-lore of peasant superstitions: the casting of spells, the making of storms, converse with spirits, sympathetic magic….I am concerned with the organized, systematic ‘demonology’ which the medieval Church constructed out of those beliefs and which, in the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries, acquired a terrible momentum of its own” • “We cannot see the long persistence and even aggravation of the witch-craze merely as a necessary effect of clerical domination, or its dissolution as the logical consequence of release from religious fundamentalism” • “Isolated rural societies anywhere—in the dreary flats of the Landes in Frances, or of Essex in England, or in the sandy plain of north Germany—would always be subject to witch-beliefs…Individual inquisitors, too, would discover or create beliefs in any area in which they happened to operate: Krämer and Sprenger would have plenty of counterparts among the Protestant clergy—and among them laity too, like Matthew Hopkins, the famous ‘witch-finder general’ of the English civil war.” • The question is not “ ‘why people believed in witchcraft,’ but rather, ‘who witchcraft functioned for, once the basic assumptions about the nature of evil, the types of causation, and the origins of supernatural ‘power’ were present.’” (Ginzburg at 3)
>
>
  • "The light [of advancement] continually, if irregularly, gains at the expense of darkness"
  • In terms of witch hunts, "[t]he years 1550-1600 were worse than the years 1500-1550, and the years 1600-1650 were worse still."
  • "For in the Dark Age there was at least no witch-craze. There were witch-beliefs, of course—a scattered folk-lore of peasant superstitions: the casting of spells, the making of storms, converse with spirits, sympathetic magic….I am concerned with the organized, systematic ‘demonology’ which the medieval Church constructed out of those beliefs and which, in the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries, acquired a terrible momentum of its own"
  • "We cannot see the long persistence and even aggravation of the witch-craze merely as a necessary effect of clerical domination, or its dissolution as the logical consequence of release from religious fundamentalism"
  • "Isolated rural societies anywhere—in the dreary flats of the Landes in Frances, or of Essex in England, or in the sandy plain of north Germany—would always be subject to witch-beliefs…Individual inquisitors, too, would discover or create beliefs in any area in which they happened to operate: Krämer and Sprenger would have plenty of counterparts among the Protestant clergy—and among them laity too, like Matthew Hopkins, the famous ‘witch-finder general’ of the English civil war."
  • The question is not " ‘why people believed in witchcraft,’ but rather, ‘who witchcraft functioned for, once the basic assumptions about the nature of evil, the types of causation, and the origins of supernatural ‘power’ were present.’" (Ginzburg at 3)
 

WITCHCRAFT AND SOCIETY

Changed:
<
<
• “Since a system was presupposed, a system was found.” • “Magic is thus, like desire, ambivalent from the start: it may provide protection for a society, but it also suggests the existence of the need for protection.” o Consider the conditions in place that require communities to protect themsel • “Year after year inflammatory books and sermons warned the Christian public of the danger, urged the Christian magistrate to greater vigilance, greater persecution. Confessors and judges were supplied with manuals incorporating all the latest information, village hatreds were exploited in order to ensure exposure, torture was used to extract and expand confessions, and lenient judges were denounced as enemies of the people of God, drowsy guardians of the beleaguered citadel”
>
>
  • "Since a system was presupposed, a system was found."
  • "Magic is thus, like desire, ambivalent from the start: it may provide protection for a society, but it also suggests the existence of the need for protection."
  • Consider the conditions in place that require communities to protect themsel
  • "Year after year inflammatory books and sermons warned the Christian public of the danger, urged the Christian magistrate to greater vigilance, greater persecution. Confessors and judges were supplied with manuals incorporating all the latest information, village hatreds were exploited in order to ensure exposure, torture was used to extract and expand confessions, and lenient judges were denounced as enemies of the people of God, drowsy guardians of the beleaguered citadel"
 The Common Belief:
Changed:
<
<
• “the witches’ sabat would become [93] an objective fact, disbelieved only…by those of unsound mind; and the ingenuity of churchmen and lawyers would be taxed to explain away that inconvenient text of canon law, the canon Episcopi.” • “Laymen might not accept all of the esoteric details supplied by the experts, but they accepted the general truth of the theory, and because they accepted its general truth, they were unable to argue against its more learned interpreters. So the experts effectively commanded the field.” • “But once the mythology had been established, it acquired, as it were, a reality of its own. Ideology is indivisible, and those who believed that there were devil-worshipping societies in the mountains soon discovered that there were devil-worshipping individuals in the plains.”
>
>
  • "the witches’ sabat would become [93] an objective fact, disbelieved only…by those of unsound mind; and the ingenuity of churchmen and lawyers would be taxed to explain away that inconvenient text of canon law, the canon Episcopi."
  • "Laymen might not accept all of the esoteric details supplied by the experts, but they accepted the general truth of the theory, and because they accepted its general truth, they were unable to argue against its more learned interpreters. So the experts effectively commanded the field."
  • "But once the mythology had been established, it acquired, as it were, a reality of its own. Ideology is indivisible, and those who believed that there were devil-worshipping societies in the mountains soon discovered that there were devil-worshipping individuals in the plains."
 

TIME FRAME

Changed:
<
<
• “The middle of the seventeenth century was a period of revolutions in Europe” o “There is the Puritan Revolution in England which fills the twenty years between 1640 and 1660, but whose crisis was between 1648 and 1653.” o “For a generation they had felt it coming. Ever since 1618 at least there had been talk of the dissolution of society, or of the world; and the undefined sense of gloom of which we are constantly aware in those years was justified sometimes by new interpretation of Scripture, sometime by new phenomena in the skies.” o “It is as if a series of rainstorms has ended in one final thunderstorm which has cleared the air and changed, permanently, the temperature of Europe”
>
>
  • "The middle of the seventeenth century was a period of revolutions in Europe"
  • "There is the Puritan Revolution in England which fills the twenty years between 1640 and 1660, but whose crisis was between 1648 and 1653."
  • "For a generation they had felt it coming. Ever since 1618 at least there had been talk of the dissolution of society, or of the world; and the undefined sense of gloom of which we are constantly aware in those years was justified sometimes by new interpretation of Scripture, sometime by new phenomena in the skies."
  • "It is as if a series of rainstorms has ended in one final thunderstorm which has cleared the air and changed, permanently, the temperature of Europe"
 

WHO ARE WITCHES?/WHAT DO WITCHES DO?

Changed:
<
<
• “The basic evidence of the kingdom of God had been supplied by Revelation. But the Father of Lies had not revealed himself so openly. To penetrate the secrets of his kingdom, it was therefore necessary to rely on indirect sources. These sources could only be captured members of the enemy intelligence service: in other words, confessing witches.”
>
>
  • "The basic evidence of the kingdom of God had been supplied by Revelation. But the Father of Lies had not revealed himself so openly. To penetrate the secrets of his kingdom, it was therefore necessary to rely on indirect sources. These sources could only be captured members of the enemy intelligence service: in other words, confessing witches."
 A transition from witch-belief to witchcraft
Changed:
<
<
• “…the essential substance of the new demonology—the pact with Satan, the witches’ sabbat, the carnal intercourse with demons, etc., etc.—and the hierarchical, systematic structure of the kingdom of the Devil, are independent product of the later Middle Ages” • “At a popular level every kind of magical activity, including any unacceptable brand of religion, might be lumped together under the blanket title of ‘witchcraft’, and there was no special term to indicate maleficent magicians.” o “Nevertheless, it is possible to isolate that kind of ‘witchcraft’ which involved the employment (or presumed employment) of some occult means of doing harm to other people in a way which was generally disapproved of.”
>
>
  • "…the essential substance of the new demonology—the pact with Satan, the witches’ sabbat, the carnal intercourse with demons, etc., etc.—and the hierarchical, systematic structure of the kingdom of the Devil, are independent product of the later Middle Ages"
  • "At a popular level every kind of magical activity, including any unacceptable brand of religion, might be lumped together under the blanket title of ‘witchcraft’, and there was no special term to indicate maleficent magicians."
  • "Nevertheless, it is possible to isolate that kind of ‘witchcraft’ which involved the employment (or presumed employment) of some occult means of doing harm to other people in a way which was generally disapproved of."
 What is a witch in 17th century England?
Changed:
<
<
• “A witch was a person of either sex (but more often female) who could mysteriously injure other people” o Discourse on the Damned Art of Witchcraft (1608) (suggesting that women, as the weaker sex, were more prone to the “devil’s illusions”) • By the sixteenth century, the belief in the existence of witchcraft was common. It was regarded as “the logical corollary of the equally widespread possibility in the belief of beneficent magic.” o Thomas contends that “witch-beliefs of [the maleficent] kind were as old as human history, and in no sense peculiarly English” and that, during the late Middle Ages, a new element distinguished this type of witchcraft from that of past primitive peoples: Christianity.  “In return for her promise of allegiance, she was thought to have been given the means of wreaking supernatural vengeance upon her enemies. Seen from this new point of view, the essence of witchcraft was not the damage it did to other persons, but its heretical character—devil-worship.” • “Not witches riding brooms, nor kissing the devil’s behind, nor cannibalizing babies—but simple maleficium characterized English witchcraft.” o “Maleficium is the damage that he might to do: this would take the form of injuring or killing someone or causing harm to their property—such as killing or injuring livestock or frustrating the production of goods.” o “The witch could exercise her power through physical contact, either touching the victim or emanating power from her eyes (in which case, the victim is said to have been ‘fascinated’ or ‘overlooked’), or pronounce a verbal curse (in which case, the victim was ‘forspoken’).” • “Whether or not the witch injured other people, she deserved to die for her disloyalty to God.” o “It was common-place medieval theology to assert that any magical activity, however beneficent in intention, necessarily involved a tacit compact wit the Devil, and should therefore be punished.”
>
>
  • "A witch was a person of either sex (but more often female) who could mysteriously injure other people"
  • Discourse on the Damned Art of Witchcraft (1608) (suggesting that women, as the weaker sex, were more prone to the "devil’s illusions")
  • By the sixteenth century, the belief in the existence of witchcraft was common. It was regarded as "the logical corollary of the equally widespread possibility in the belief of beneficent magic."
  • Thomas contends that "witch-beliefs of [the maleficent] kind were as old as human history, and in no sense peculiarly English" and that, during the late Middle Ages, a new element distinguished this type of witchcraft from that of past primitive peoples: Christianity.
 "In return for her promise of allegiance, she was thought to have been given the means of wreaking supernatural vengeance upon her enemies. Seen from this new point of view, the essence of witchcraft was not the damage it did to other persons, but its heretical character—devil-worship."
  • "Not witches riding brooms, nor kissing the devil’s behind, nor cannibalizing babies—but simple maleficium characterized English witchcraft."
  • "Maleficium is the damage that he might to do: this would take the form of injuring or killing someone or causing harm to their property—such as killing or injuring livestock or frustrating the production of goods."
  • "The witch could exercise her power through physical contact, either touching the victim or emanating power from her eyes (in which case, the victim is said to have been ‘fascinated’ or ‘overlooked’), or pronounce a verbal curse (in which case, the victim was ‘forspoken’)."
  • "Whether or not the witch injured other people, she deserved to die for her disloyalty to God."
  • "It was common-place medieval theology to assert that any magical activity, however beneficent in intention, necessarily involved a tacit compact wit the Devil, and should therefore be punished."
 

TRIAL OF WITCHES Substance:

Changed:
<
<
• Three Acts of Parliament on witchcraft: o 1542 (repealed in 1547), 33 Hen. Viii, cap. 8 (repealed by I Edw. vi, cap. 12)  “In 1542 it was made a felony (and therefore a capital offence) to conjure spirits or to practise witchcraft, enchantment or sorcery, in order to find treasure; to waste or destroy a person’s body, limbs, or goods; or ‘for any other unlawful intent or purpose’.”  “this Act clearly treated the crime of witchcraft as consisting in positive acts of hostility to the community, rather than in relations with the Devil as such.” o 1563 (repealed 1604), 5 Eliz., cap. 16;  “It was more severe than its predecessor, in that it made it a felony to invoke evil spirits for any purpose whatsoever, whether maleficium was involved or not. But it was also more lenient, in that witchcraft…[was] deemed [a] capital felon[y] only if [it actually resulted in the death of a human victim.” o 1604 (repealed 1736), I Jac. I, c. 12 (repealed by 9 Geo. Ii, cap. 5)  “the full continental doctrine” taking effect.  Included the previous felony categories. “It furthermore declared it to be felony if the victim was only injured; and it replaced life imprisonment by death as the penalty for a second offence in the case of lesser kinds of magic”… “to ‘consult, covenant with, entertain, employ, feed, or reward any evil and wicked spirit to or for any intent or purpose.’” • The Act of 1604 “represented the furthest point to which the English law on witchcraft was adapted to fit continental doctrines. For it meant that evidence of relationship with evil spirits or animal familiar was technically sufficient to secure the judicial condemnation of an accused person, regardless of whether or not he or she had harmed anyone.” • “the evidence of the statute-book, taken as a whole, suggests that in England witchcraft was prosecuted primarily as an anti-social crime, rather than as a heresy” o “This impression is confirmed by the records of the trials. In practice, most prosecutions were provoked by alleged acts of damage against other persons and seldom drew on allegations of devil-worship.”
>
>
  • Three Acts of Parliament on witchcraft:
  • 1542 (repealed in 1547), 33 Hen. Viii, cap. 8 (repealed by I Edw. vi, cap. 12)
 "In 1542 it was made a felony (and therefore a capital offence) to conjure spirits or to practise witchcraft, enchantment or sorcery, in order to find treasure; to waste or destroy a person’s body, limbs, or goods; or ‘for any other unlawful intent or purpose’."  "this Act clearly treated the crime of witchcraft as consisting in positive acts of hostility to the community, rather than in relations with the Devil as such."
  • 1563 (repealed 1604), 5 Eliz., cap. 16;
 "It was more severe than its predecessor, in that it made it a felony to invoke evil spirits for any purpose whatsoever, whether maleficium was involved or not. But it was also more lenient, in that witchcraft…[was] deemed [a] capital felon[y] only if [it actually resulted in the death of a human victim."
  • 1604 (repealed 1736), I Jac. I, c. 12 (repealed by 9 Geo. Ii, cap. 5)
 "the full continental doctrine" taking effect.  Included the previous felony categories. "It furthermore declared it to be felony if the victim was only injured; and it replaced life imprisonment by death as the penalty for a second offence in the case of lesser kinds of magic"… "to ‘consult, covenant with, entertain, employ, feed, or reward any evil and wicked spirit to or for any intent or purpose.’"
  • The Act of 1604 "represented the furthest point to which the English law on witchcraft was adapted to fit continental doctrines. For it meant that evidence of relationship with evil spirits or animal familiar was technically sufficient to secure the judicial condemnation of an accused person, regardless of whether or not he or she had harmed anyone."
  • "the evidence of the statute-book, taken as a whole, suggests that in England witchcraft was prosecuted primarily as an anti-social crime, rather than as a heresy"
  • "This impression is confirmed by the records of the trials. In practice, most prosecutions were provoked by alleged acts of damage against other persons and seldom drew on allegations of devil-worship."
 Process (evidence, torture, etc.) [Broadly, what were the rights afforded to ∆s at trial? What was the trial process like? How did these rights differ from those afforded to witches?]
Changed:
<
<
• Contract with the Devil: “No reference in a trial to an oral compact with the Devil is recorded before 1612; and not until the investigations of Matthew Hopkins, the professional witch-finder who was active in the late 1640s, was there sworn evidence testifying to a written covenant” o For other examples (i.e., sabbath, sexual assault, flying), see Thomas at 445. • Body marks: “The one common feature of English witch-trials which does indicate some sort of association in the popular mind…was the notion that the witch bore on her body the mark of her profession in the form of a spot or excresence, which could be discovered by searching her for an ‘unnatural’ mark, usually recognisable because it would not bleed when pricked and was insensible to pain.” o “The witch’s mark was sometimes thought of as a teat from which the familiar [an animal] could suck the witch’s blood as a form of nourishment. IT thus became a common procedure in witch-detection to isolate the suspect and wait for some animal or insect to appear as proof of her guilt” o “Familiars gained a recognized place in witch-accusations at an early stage”
>
>
  • Contract with the Devil: "No reference in a trial to an oral compact with the Devil is recorded before 1612; and not until the investigations of Matthew Hopkins, the professional witch-finder who was active in the late 1640s, was there sworn evidence testifying to a written covenant"
  • For other examples (i.e., sabbath, sexual assault, flying), see Thomas at 445.
  • Body marks: "The one common feature of English witch-trials which does indicate some sort of association in the popular mind…was the notion that the witch bore on her body the mark of her profession in the form of a spot or excresence, which could be discovered by searching her for an ‘unnatural’ mark, usually recognisable because it would not bleed when pricked and was insensible to pain."
  • "The witch’s mark was sometimes thought of as a teat from which the familiar [an animal] could suck the witch’s blood as a form of nourishment. IT thus became a common procedure in witch-detection to isolate the suspect and wait for some animal or insect to appear as proof of her guilt"
  • "Familiars gained a recognized place in witch-accusations at an early stage"
 The Confession: Use of Torture
Changed:
<
<
• “…England alone escaped from the judicial use of torture in ordinary criminal [119] cases, including cases of witchcraft.” o But “[t]here was also some non-judicial torture in ill-regulated cases: e.g. during the civil wars, when Matthew Hopkins and his assistant used the tortmentum imsomniae.” • However, according to T-R, torture alone is insufficient to explain “why even in England, where there was no judicial torture, witches confessed to absurd crimes; why the people were so docile in the face of such mania; and above all, why some of the most original and cultivated men of the time not only accepted the theory of witchcraft, but positively devoted their genius to its propagation.” • “What was ‘subjective reality’ to the penitent was ‘objective reality’ to the confessor. Out of those fragments of truth, spontaneously given if amplified by suggestion or torture, a total picture of Satan’s kingdom could, by logic, by the ‘rationalism’ of the time, be built up.” o Trial of Alison Device (Pendle witches, 1612) o [Perhaps the confession serves as a way to do God’s work against Satan. Internalized self-regulation?]
>
>
  • "…England alone escaped from the judicial use of torture in ordinary criminal [119] cases, including cases of witchcraft."
  • But "[t]here was also some non-judicial torture in ill-regulated cases: e.g. during the civil wars, when Matthew Hopkins and his assistant used the tortmentum imsomniae."
  • However, according to T-R, torture alone is insufficient to explain "why even in England, where there was no judicial torture, witches confessed to absurd crimes; why the people were so docile in the face of such mania; and above all, why some of the most original and cultivated men of the time not only accepted the theory of witchcraft, but positively devoted their genius to its propagation."
  • "What was ‘subjective reality’ to the penitent was ‘objective reality’ to the confessor. Out of those fragments of truth, spontaneously given if amplified by suggestion or torture, a total picture of Satan’s kingdom could, by logic, by the ‘rationalism’ of the time, be built up."
  • Trial of Alison Device (Pendle witches, 1612)
  • [Perhaps the confession serves as a way to do God’s work against Satan. Internalized self-regulation?]
 Comparative Perspective
Changed:
<
<
• Malleus Maleficarum advocated the use of torture if other means proved unsatisfactory • Continental use of torture o “Judicial torture had been allowed, in limited cases, by Roman law; but Roman law, and with it judicial torture, had been forgotten in the Dark Ages.” o Returned in the eleventh century. o Eventually judges would sometimes disallow testimony because “they knew that it had been created by tortured and was therefore unreliable” • Discussing Scottish and continental witch trials: “For such a crime, the ordinary rules of evidence, as the ordinary limits of torture, were suspended. For how could ordinary methods prove such extraordinary crimes?” o “So, in the absence of ‘a grave indicium’…circumstantial evidence was sufficient to mobilize the process.”
>
>
  • Malleus Maleficarum advocated the use of torture if other means proved unsatisfactory
  • Continental use of torture
  • "Judicial torture had been allowed, in limited cases, by Roman law; but Roman law, and with it judicial torture, had been forgotten in the Dark Ages."
  • Returned in the eleventh century.
  • Eventually judges would sometimes disallow testimony because "they knew that it had been created by tortured and was therefore unreliable"
  • Discussing Scottish and continental witch trials: "For such a crime, the ordinary rules of evidence, as the ordinary limits of torture, were suspended. For how could ordinary methods prove such extraordinary crimes?"
  • "So, in the absence of ‘a grave indicium’…circumstantial evidence was sufficient to mobilize the process."
 

The End of Witch-hunting

Changed:
<
<
• “By the 1680s the battle is effectively won, at least in the west.” • “The rubbish of the human mind which for two centuries, by some process of intellectual alchemy and social pressure, had become fused together in a coherent, explosive system, has disintegrated. It is rubbish again.”
>
>
  • "By the 1680s the battle is effectively won, at least in the west."
  • "The rubbish of the human mind which for two centuries, by some process of intellectual alchemy and social pressure, had become fused together in a coherent, explosive system, has disintegrated. It is rubbish again."
 
Line: 115 to 116
 -- IsraelRodriguezRubio - 07 Nov 2019
Changed:
<
<
 
<--/commentPlugin-->
>
>
This is a good beginning. You have laid out an outline of discussion, and you have pointed to quotations from secondary sources you intend to use. But we don't yet know what your thesis is: what question you are answering, and how your answer develops from the materials. Your "ideas to consider" are well-chosen, but we don't yet know how your considering works out. Definitely a sound basis. Onward.

 

META FILEATTACHMENT attachment="Witchcraft_Outline.docx" attr="" comment="" date="1573099471" name="Witchcraft_Outline.docx" path="Witchcraft Outline.docx" size="27551" stream="Witchcraft Outline.docx" user="Main.IsraelRodriguezRubio" version="1"

OnWitchraft 1 - 07 Nov 2019 - Main.IsraelRodriguezRubio
Line: 1 to 1
Added:
>
>
META TOPICPARENT name="ArticlesInProcess"
The Community’s Peace: Witchcraft, Popular Culture, and the Law, xxxx-xxxx

• “And beneath the surface of an ever more sophisticated society what dark passions and inflammable credulities do we find, sometimes accidentally released, sometimes deliberately mobilized!”

• “All Christendom, it seems, is at the mercy of these horrifying creatures.”

Ideas to consider: • What are the objectives of criminal law at this time? o Is restoration an objective? And if so, what is the law the restoring and to whom? • What is the law of evidence at this time?

• “The light [of advancement] continually, if irregularly, gains at the expense of darkness” • In terms of witch hunts, “[t]he years 1550-1600 were worse than the years 1500-1550, and the years 1600-1650 were worse still.” o “For in the Dark Age there was at least no witch-craze. There were witch-beliefs, of course—a scattered folk-lore of peasant superstitions: the casting of spells, the making of storms, converse with spirits, sympathetic magic….I am concerned with the organized, systematic ‘demonology’ which the medieval Church constructed out of those beliefs and which, in the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries, acquired a terrible momentum of its own” • “We cannot see the long persistence and even aggravation of the witch-craze merely as a necessary effect of clerical domination, or its dissolution as the logical consequence of release from religious fundamentalism” • “Isolated rural societies anywhere—in the dreary flats of the Landes in Frances, or of Essex in England, or in the sandy plain of north Germany—would always be subject to witch-beliefs…Individual inquisitors, too, would discover or create beliefs in any area in which they happened to operate: Krämer and Sprenger would have plenty of counterparts among the Protestant clergy—and among them laity too, like Matthew Hopkins, the famous ‘witch-finder general’ of the English civil war.” • The question is not “ ‘why people believed in witchcraft,’ but rather, ‘who witchcraft functioned for, once the basic assumptions about the nature of evil, the types of causation, and the origins of supernatural ‘power’ were present.’” (Ginzburg at 3)

WITCHCRAFT AND SOCIETY • “Since a system was presupposed, a system was found.” • “Magic is thus, like desire, ambivalent from the start: it may provide protection for a society, but it also suggests the existence of the need for protection.” o Consider the conditions in place that require communities to protect themsel • “Year after year inflammatory books and sermons warned the Christian public of the danger, urged the Christian magistrate to greater vigilance, greater persecution. Confessors and judges were supplied with manuals incorporating all the latest information, village hatreds were exploited in order to ensure exposure, torture was used to extract and expand confessions, and lenient judges were denounced as enemies of the people of God, drowsy guardians of the beleaguered citadel”

The Common Belief: • “the witches’ sabat would become [93] an objective fact, disbelieved only…by those of unsound mind; and the ingenuity of churchmen and lawyers would be taxed to explain away that inconvenient text of canon law, the canon Episcopi.” • “Laymen might not accept all of the esoteric details supplied by the experts, but they accepted the general truth of the theory, and because they accepted its general truth, they were unable to argue against its more learned interpreters. So the experts effectively commanded the field.” • “But once the mythology had been established, it acquired, as it were, a reality of its own. Ideology is indivisible, and those who believed that there were devil-worshipping societies in the mountains soon discovered that there were devil-worshipping individuals in the plains.”

TIME FRAME • “The middle of the seventeenth century was a period of revolutions in Europe” o “There is the Puritan Revolution in England which fills the twenty years between 1640 and 1660, but whose crisis was between 1648 and 1653.” o “For a generation they had felt it coming. Ever since 1618 at least there had been talk of the dissolution of society, or of the world; and the undefined sense of gloom of which we are constantly aware in those years was justified sometimes by new interpretation of Scripture, sometime by new phenomena in the skies.” o “It is as if a series of rainstorms has ended in one final thunderstorm which has cleared the air and changed, permanently, the temperature of Europe”

WHO ARE WITCHES?/WHAT DO WITCHES DO? • “The basic evidence of the kingdom of God had been supplied by Revelation. But the Father of Lies had not revealed himself so openly. To penetrate the secrets of his kingdom, it was therefore necessary to rely on indirect sources. These sources could only be captured members of the enemy intelligence service: in other words, confessing witches.”

A transition from witch-belief to witchcraft • “…the essential substance of the new demonology—the pact with Satan, the witches’ sabbat, the carnal intercourse with demons, etc., etc.—and the hierarchical, systematic structure of the kingdom of the Devil, are independent product of the later Middle Ages” • “At a popular level every kind of magical activity, including any unacceptable brand of religion, might be lumped together under the blanket title of ‘witchcraft’, and there was no special term to indicate maleficent magicians.” o “Nevertheless, it is possible to isolate that kind of ‘witchcraft’ which involved the employment (or presumed employment) of some occult means of doing harm to other people in a way which was generally disapproved of.”

What is a witch in 17th century England? • “A witch was a person of either sex (but more often female) who could mysteriously injure other people” o Discourse on the Damned Art of Witchcraft (1608) (suggesting that women, as the weaker sex, were more prone to the “devil’s illusions”) • By the sixteenth century, the belief in the existence of witchcraft was common. It was regarded as “the logical corollary of the equally widespread possibility in the belief of beneficent magic.” o Thomas contends that “witch-beliefs of [the maleficent] kind were as old as human history, and in no sense peculiarly English” and that, during the late Middle Ages, a new element distinguished this type of witchcraft from that of past primitive peoples: Christianity.  “In return for her promise of allegiance, she was thought to have been given the means of wreaking supernatural vengeance upon her enemies. Seen from this new point of view, the essence of witchcraft was not the damage it did to other persons, but its heretical character—devil-worship.” • “Not witches riding brooms, nor kissing the devil’s behind, nor cannibalizing babies—but simple maleficium characterized English witchcraft.” o “Maleficium is the damage that he might to do: this would take the form of injuring or killing someone or causing harm to their property—such as killing or injuring livestock or frustrating the production of goods.” o “The witch could exercise her power through physical contact, either touching the victim or emanating power from her eyes (in which case, the victim is said to have been ‘fascinated’ or ‘overlooked’), or pronounce a verbal curse (in which case, the victim was ‘forspoken’).” • “Whether or not the witch injured other people, she deserved to die for her disloyalty to God.” o “It was common-place medieval theology to assert that any magical activity, however beneficent in intention, necessarily involved a tacit compact wit the Devil, and should therefore be punished.”

TRIAL OF WITCHES Substance: • Three Acts of Parliament on witchcraft: o 1542 (repealed in 1547), 33 Hen. Viii, cap. 8 (repealed by I Edw. vi, cap. 12)  “In 1542 it was made a felony (and therefore a capital offence) to conjure spirits or to practise witchcraft, enchantment or sorcery, in order to find treasure; to waste or destroy a person’s body, limbs, or goods; or ‘for any other unlawful intent or purpose’.”  “this Act clearly treated the crime of witchcraft as consisting in positive acts of hostility to the community, rather than in relations with the Devil as such.” o 1563 (repealed 1604), 5 Eliz., cap. 16;  “It was more severe than its predecessor, in that it made it a felony to invoke evil spirits for any purpose whatsoever, whether maleficium was involved or not. But it was also more lenient, in that witchcraft…[was] deemed [a] capital felon[y] only if [it actually resulted in the death of a human victim.” o 1604 (repealed 1736), I Jac. I, c. 12 (repealed by 9 Geo. Ii, cap. 5)  “the full continental doctrine” taking effect.  Included the previous felony categories. “It furthermore declared it to be felony if the victim was only injured; and it replaced life imprisonment by death as the penalty for a second offence in the case of lesser kinds of magic”… “to ‘consult, covenant with, entertain, employ, feed, or reward any evil and wicked spirit to or for any intent or purpose.’” • The Act of 1604 “represented the furthest point to which the English law on witchcraft was adapted to fit continental doctrines. For it meant that evidence of relationship with evil spirits or animal familiar was technically sufficient to secure the judicial condemnation of an accused person, regardless of whether or not he or she had harmed anyone.” • “the evidence of the statute-book, taken as a whole, suggests that in England witchcraft was prosecuted primarily as an anti-social crime, rather than as a heresy” o “This impression is confirmed by the records of the trials. In practice, most prosecutions were provoked by alleged acts of damage against other persons and seldom drew on allegations of devil-worship.”

Process (evidence, torture, etc.) [Broadly, what were the rights afforded to ∆s at trial? What was the trial process like? How did these rights differ from those afforded to witches?] • Contract with the Devil: “No reference in a trial to an oral compact with the Devil is recorded before 1612; and not until the investigations of Matthew Hopkins, the professional witch-finder who was active in the late 1640s, was there sworn evidence testifying to a written covenant” o For other examples (i.e., sabbath, sexual assault, flying), see Thomas at 445. • Body marks: “The one common feature of English witch-trials which does indicate some sort of association in the popular mind…was the notion that the witch bore on her body the mark of her profession in the form of a spot or excresence, which could be discovered by searching her for an ‘unnatural’ mark, usually recognisable because it would not bleed when pricked and was insensible to pain.” o “The witch’s mark was sometimes thought of as a teat from which the familiar [an animal] could suck the witch’s blood as a form of nourishment. IT thus became a common procedure in witch-detection to isolate the suspect and wait for some animal or insect to appear as proof of her guilt” o “Familiars gained a recognized place in witch-accusations at an early stage”

The Confession: Use of Torture • “…England alone escaped from the judicial use of torture in ordinary criminal [119] cases, including cases of witchcraft.” o But “[t]here was also some non-judicial torture in ill-regulated cases: e.g. during the civil wars, when Matthew Hopkins and his assistant used the tortmentum imsomniae.” • However, according to T-R, torture alone is insufficient to explain “why even in England, where there was no judicial torture, witches confessed to absurd crimes; why the people were so docile in the face of such mania; and above all, why some of the most original and cultivated men of the time not only accepted the theory of witchcraft, but positively devoted their genius to its propagation.” • “What was ‘subjective reality’ to the penitent was ‘objective reality’ to the confessor. Out of those fragments of truth, spontaneously given if amplified by suggestion or torture, a total picture of Satan’s kingdom could, by logic, by the ‘rationalism’ of the time, be built up.” o Trial of Alison Device (Pendle witches, 1612) o [Perhaps the confession serves as a way to do God’s work against Satan. Internalized self-regulation?]

Comparative Perspective • Malleus Maleficarum advocated the use of torture if other means proved unsatisfactory • Continental use of torture o “Judicial torture had been allowed, in limited cases, by Roman law; but Roman law, and with it judicial torture, had been forgotten in the Dark Ages.” o Returned in the eleventh century. o Eventually judges would sometimes disallow testimony because “they knew that it had been created by tortured and was therefore unreliable” • Discussing Scottish and continental witch trials: “For such a crime, the ordinary rules of evidence, as the ordinary limits of torture, were suspended. For how could ordinary methods prove such extraordinary crimes?” o “So, in the absence of ‘a grave indicium’…circumstantial evidence was sufficient to mobilize the process.”

The End of Witch-hunting • “By the 1680s the battle is effectively won, at least in the west.” • “The rubbish of the human mind which for two centuries, by some process of intellectual alchemy and social pressure, had become fused together in a coherent, explosive system, has disintegrated. It is rubbish again.”

-- IsraelRodriguezRubio - 07 Nov 2019

 
<--/commentPlugin-->

META FILEATTACHMENT attachment="Witchcraft_Outline.docx" attr="" comment="" date="1573099471" name="Witchcraft_Outline.docx" path="Witchcraft Outline.docx" size="27551" stream="Witchcraft Outline.docx" user="Main.IsraelRodriguezRubio" version="1"

Revision 6r6 - 21 Dec 2019 - 00:33:17 - IsraelRodriguezRubio
Revision 5r5 - 05 Dec 2019 - 04:04:34 - IsraelRodriguezRubio
Revision 4r4 - 05 Dec 2019 - 01:42:20 - IsraelRodriguezRubio
Revision 3r3 - 03 Dec 2019 - 15:46:57 - IsraelRodriguezRubio
Revision 2r2 - 14 Nov 2019 - 11:54:09 - EbenMoglen
Revision 1r1 - 07 Nov 2019 - 04:04:31 - IsraelRodriguezRubio
This site is powered by the TWiki collaboration platform.
All material on this collaboration platform is the property of the contributing authors.
All material marked as authored by Eben Moglen is available under the license terms CC-BY-SA version 4.
Syndicate this site RSSATOM