<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-15" ?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:wiki="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/wiki/" ><channel rdf:about="http://moglen.law.columbia.edu/twiki/bin/view/EngLegalHist">
<title>TWiki's EngLegalHist web</title>
  <link>http://moglen.law.columbia.edu/twiki/bin/view/EngLegalHist</link>
  <description>The EngLegalHist web of TWiki.</description>
<image rdf:resource="http://moglen.law.columbia.edu/twiki/pub/TWiki/TWikiLogos/T-logo-140x40-t.gif" />
  <dc:language>en-us</dc:language>
  <dc:rights>Copyright 2008 by contributing authors</dc:rights>
  <dc:publisher>Eben Moglen [webmaster@emoglen.law.columbia.edu]</dc:publisher>
  <dc:creator>The contributing authors of TWiki</dc:creator>
  <dc:source>TWiki</dc:source>
  <items>
    <rdf:Seq>
      <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://moglen.law.columbia.edu/twiki/bin/view/EngLegalHist/StatuteLaborers" />
      <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://moglen.law.columbia.edu/twiki/bin/view/EngLegalHist/RefugeeProperty" />
      <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://moglen.law.columbia.edu/twiki/bin/view/EngLegalHist/PerjuriousWager" />
      <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://moglen.law.columbia.edu/twiki/bin/view/EngLegalHist/OriginPeremptories" />
      <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://moglen.law.columbia.edu/twiki/bin/view/EngLegalHist/PaperTopics" />
      <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://moglen.law.columbia.edu/twiki/bin/view/EngLegalHist/SouthcotesCase" />
      <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://moglen.law.columbia.edu/twiki/bin/view/EngLegalHist/OriginCertiorari" />
      <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://moglen.law.columbia.edu/twiki/bin/view/EngLegalHist/VestedAndContingentRemainders" />
      <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://moglen.law.columbia.edu/twiki/bin/view/EngLegalHist/QuoMinus" />
      <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://moglen.law.columbia.edu/twiki/bin/view/EngLegalHist/LanevCotton" />
      <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://moglen.law.columbia.edu/twiki/bin/view/EngLegalHist/MitchellAllestry" />
      <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://moglen.law.columbia.edu/twiki/bin/view/EngLegalHist/JailersLiability" />
      <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://moglen.law.columbia.edu/twiki/bin/view/EngLegalHist/DoigesCase" />
      <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://moglen.law.columbia.edu/twiki/bin/view/EngLegalHist/ArmorieDelamirie" />
      <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://moglen.law.columbia.edu/twiki/bin/view/EngLegalHist/StatsEdwII" />
      <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://moglen.law.columbia.edu/twiki/bin/view/EngLegalHist/CommonRecovery" />
    </rdf:Seq>
  </items>
</channel>
<image rdf:about="http://moglen.law.columbia.edu/twiki/pub/TWiki/TWikiLogos/T-logo-140x40-t.gif">
  <title>Powered by TWiki.EngLegalHist</title>
  <link>http://moglen.law.columbia.edu/twiki/bin/view/EngLegalHist</link>
  <url>http://moglen.law.columbia.edu/twiki/pub/TWiki/TWikiLogos/T-logo-140x40-t.gif</url>
</image>
<item rdf:about="http://moglen.law.columbia.edu/twiki/bin/view/EngLegalHist/StatuteLaborers">
  <title>StatuteLaborers</title>
  <link>http://moglen.law.columbia.edu/twiki/bin/view/EngLegalHist/StatuteLaborers</link>
  <description>Labor Policy after 1348 and Theory of Contract How did the Statute of Laborers of 1351 contribute to the development of assumpsit as a replacement for covenant and ... (last changed by AdamKrotman)</description>
  <dc:date>2008-11-13T18:28:37Z</dc:date>
  <dc:contributor>
    <rdf:Description link="http://moglen.law.columbia.edu/twiki/bin/view?topic=Main.AdamKrotman">
      <rdf:value>AdamKrotman</rdf:value>
    </rdf:Description>
  </dc:contributor>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://moglen.law.columbia.edu/twiki/bin/view/EngLegalHist/RefugeeProperty">
  <title>RefugeeProperty</title>
  <link>http://moglen.law.columbia.edu/twiki/bin/view/EngLegalHist/RefugeeProperty</link>
  <description>Political Refugees' Property I'd like this topic. Becky The most celebrated political refugee from the reign of Mary Tudor seems to have been Katherine Willoughby ... (last changed by BeckyPrebble)</description>
  <dc:date>2008-11-12T22:57:06Z</dc:date>
  <dc:contributor>
    <rdf:Description link="http://moglen.law.columbia.edu/twiki/bin/view?topic=Main.BeckyPrebble">
      <rdf:value>BeckyPrebble</rdf:value>
    </rdf:Description>
  </dc:contributor>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://moglen.law.columbia.edu/twiki/bin/view/EngLegalHist/PerjuriousWager">
  <title>PerjuriousWager</title>
  <link>http://moglen.law.columbia.edu/twiki/bin/view/EngLegalHist/PerjuriousWager</link>
  <description>Perjurious Wager What happens if a plaintiff complains to the church courts of the perjury when a defendant falsely wages his law? I'll take this one Chris (last changed by ChrisAnthony)</description>
  <dc:date>2008-11-12T19:57:27Z</dc:date>
  <dc:contributor>
    <rdf:Description link="http://moglen.law.columbia.edu/twiki/bin/view?topic=Main.ChrisAnthony">
      <rdf:value>ChrisAnthony</rdf:value>
    </rdf:Description>
  </dc:contributor>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://moglen.law.columbia.edu/twiki/bin/view/EngLegalHist/OriginPeremptories">
  <title>OriginPeremptories</title>
  <link>http://moglen.law.columbia.edu/twiki/bin/view/EngLegalHist/OriginPeremptories</link>
  <description>Origins of the Peremptory Challenge Here is a message from a colleague: My name is . I'm student from Law Faculty, in Poland. I write in the hope that You can answer ... (last changed by EbenMoglen)</description>
  <dc:date>2008-11-11T14:10:54Z</dc:date>
  <dc:contributor>
    <rdf:Description link="http://moglen.law.columbia.edu/twiki/bin/view?topic=Main.EbenMoglen">
      <rdf:value>EbenMoglen</rdf:value>
    </rdf:Description>
  </dc:contributor>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://moglen.law.columbia.edu/twiki/bin/view/EngLegalHist/PaperTopics">
  <title>PaperTopics</title>
  <link>http://moglen.law.columbia.edu/twiki/bin/view/EngLegalHist/PaperTopics</link>
  <description>How to Do the Exercises Below are the source based exercise topics for you to choose from. I expect to add more topics shortly, as soon as I finish checking them ... (last changed by EbenMoglen)</description>
  <dc:date>2008-11-11T14:05:44Z</dc:date>
  <dc:contributor>
    <rdf:Description link="http://moglen.law.columbia.edu/twiki/bin/view?topic=Main.EbenMoglen">
      <rdf:value>EbenMoglen</rdf:value>
    </rdf:Description>
  </dc:contributor>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://moglen.law.columbia.edu/twiki/bin/view/EngLegalHist/SouthcotesCase">
  <title>SouthcotesCase</title>
  <link>http://moglen.law.columbia.edu/twiki/bin/view/EngLegalHist/SouthcotesCase</link>
  <description>Southcote's Case Why is Southcote's Case, 4 Co. Rep. 83b; Cro. Eliz. 815 (1601)? The rule never appealed to anyone before or since, as no one has ever tried to disturb ... (last changed by LuisVilla)</description>
  <dc:date>2008-11-11T04:56:54Z</dc:date>
  <dc:contributor>
    <rdf:Description link="http://moglen.law.columbia.edu/twiki/bin/view?topic=Main.LuisVilla">
      <rdf:value>LuisVilla</rdf:value>
    </rdf:Description>
  </dc:contributor>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://moglen.law.columbia.edu/twiki/bin/view/EngLegalHist/OriginCertiorari">
  <title>OriginCertiorari</title>
  <link>http://moglen.law.columbia.edu/twiki/bin/view/EngLegalHist/OriginCertiorari</link>
  <description>Origin of the Writ of Certiorari I'd like to work on this if no one else is; alternatively I'd do the Statute of Labourers 1351 Theo TheodorBruening 11 Nov 2008 ... (last changed by TheodorBruening)</description>
  <dc:date>2008-11-11T04:44:57Z</dc:date>
  <dc:contributor>
    <rdf:Description link="http://moglen.law.columbia.edu/twiki/bin/view?topic=Main.TheodorBruening">
      <rdf:value>TheodorBruening</rdf:value>
    </rdf:Description>
  </dc:contributor>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://moglen.law.columbia.edu/twiki/bin/view/EngLegalHist/VestedAndContingentRemainders">
  <title>VestedAndContingentRemainders</title>
  <link>http://moglen.law.columbia.edu/twiki/bin/view/EngLegalHist/VestedAndContingentRemainders</link>
  <description>Is there much difference between the interest of an heir apparent in an estate in fee tail and a remainderman? They seem to me to be pretty much the same thing, except ... (last changed by EbenMoglen)</description>
  <dc:date>2008-11-10T22:26:58Z</dc:date>
  <dc:contributor>
    <rdf:Description link="http://moglen.law.columbia.edu/twiki/bin/view?topic=Main.EbenMoglen">
      <rdf:value>EbenMoglen</rdf:value>
    </rdf:Description>
  </dc:contributor>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://moglen.law.columbia.edu/twiki/bin/view/EngLegalHist/QuoMinus">
  <title>QuoMinus</title>
  <link>http://moglen.law.columbia.edu/twiki/bin/view/EngLegalHist/QuoMinus</link>
  <description>Quo Minus Why would an Elizabethan attorney prefer quo minus to debt? I'll take this one. Roger RogerGoldfinger 06 Nov 2008 (last changed by RogerGoldfinger)</description>
  <dc:date>2008-11-06T21:06:45Z</dc:date>
  <dc:contributor>
    <rdf:Description link="http://moglen.law.columbia.edu/twiki/bin/view?topic=Main.RogerGoldfinger">
      <rdf:value>RogerGoldfinger</rdf:value>
    </rdf:Description>
  </dc:contributor>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://moglen.law.columbia.edu/twiki/bin/view/EngLegalHist/LanevCotton">
  <title>LanevCotton</title>
  <link>http://moglen.law.columbia.edu/twiki/bin/view/EngLegalHist/LanevCotton</link>
  <description>Lane v. Cotton What is the context and contemporary significance of Lane v. Cotton , 1 Ld. Raym 546 (1701)? Why is it relevant to the law of Internet infrastructure ... (last changed by JaneS)</description>
  <dc:date>2008-11-06T19:52:59Z</dc:date>
  <dc:contributor>
    <rdf:Description link="http://moglen.law.columbia.edu/twiki/bin/view?topic=Main.JaneS">
      <rdf:value>JaneS</rdf:value>
    </rdf:Description>
  </dc:contributor>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://moglen.law.columbia.edu/twiki/bin/view/EngLegalHist/MitchellAllestry">
  <title>MitchellAllestry</title>
  <link>http://moglen.law.columbia.edu/twiki/bin/view/EngLegalHist/MitchellAllestry</link>
  <description>Mitchell v. Allestry This case, materials collected at B M 572, was seen in the 18th and 19th centuries as inventing what American lawyers took Lemuel Shaw to have ... (last changed by MatthewPodolsky)</description>
  <dc:date>2008-11-06T16:58:25Z</dc:date>
  <dc:contributor>
    <rdf:Description link="http://moglen.law.columbia.edu/twiki/bin/view?topic=Main.MatthewPodolsky">
      <rdf:value>MatthewPodolsky</rdf:value>
    </rdf:Description>
  </dc:contributor>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://moglen.law.columbia.edu/twiki/bin/view/EngLegalHist/JailersLiability">
  <title>JailersLiability</title>
  <link>http://moglen.law.columbia.edu/twiki/bin/view/EngLegalHist/JailersLiability</link>
  <description>Jailers' Liability This is interesting. I'll take it unless a new topic sounds better. Casey Quinn (last changed by CaseyQuinn)</description>
  <dc:date>2008-10-29T02:48:35Z</dc:date>
  <dc:contributor>
    <rdf:Description link="http://moglen.law.columbia.edu/twiki/bin/view?topic=Main.CaseyQuinn">
      <rdf:value>CaseyQuinn</rdf:value>
    </rdf:Description>
  </dc:contributor>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://moglen.law.columbia.edu/twiki/bin/view/EngLegalHist/DoigesCase">
  <title>DoigesCase</title>
  <link>http://moglen.law.columbia.edu/twiki/bin/view/EngLegalHist/DoigesCase</link>
  <description>Doige's Case I'll take this one. Aaron Farber (last changed by AaronFarber)</description>
  <dc:date>2008-10-28T05:40:57Z</dc:date>
  <dc:contributor>
    <rdf:Description link="http://moglen.law.columbia.edu/twiki/bin/view?topic=Main.AaronFarber">
      <rdf:value>AaronFarber</rdf:value>
    </rdf:Description>
  </dc:contributor>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://moglen.law.columbia.edu/twiki/bin/view/EngLegalHist/ArmorieDelamirie">
  <title>ArmorieDelamirie</title>
  <link>http://moglen.law.columbia.edu/twiki/bin/view/EngLegalHist/ArmorieDelamirie</link>
  <description>Armorie v. Delamirie I would also like to work on this topic. Carol DeMartino I'll take this topic. Anyone interested in collaborating, let me know, thanks. Alex ... (last changed by CarolDeMartino)</description>
  <dc:date>2008-10-26T23:23:23Z</dc:date>
  <dc:contributor>
    <rdf:Description link="http://moglen.law.columbia.edu/twiki/bin/view?topic=Main.CarolDeMartino">
      <rdf:value>CarolDeMartino</rdf:value>
    </rdf:Description>
  </dc:contributor>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://moglen.law.columbia.edu/twiki/bin/view/EngLegalHist/StatsEdwII">
  <title>StatsEdwII</title>
  <link>http://moglen.law.columbia.edu/twiki/bin/view/EngLegalHist/StatsEdwII</link>
  <description>Statutes Royal Ordinances, Edward II I would like to work on this topic Sandipto (last changed by SandiptoDasgupta)</description>
  <dc:date>2008-10-21T16:43:58Z</dc:date>
  <dc:contributor>
    <rdf:Description link="http://moglen.law.columbia.edu/twiki/bin/view?topic=Main.SandiptoDasgupta">
      <rdf:value>SandiptoDasgupta</rdf:value>
    </rdf:Description>
  </dc:contributor>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://moglen.law.columbia.edu/twiki/bin/view/EngLegalHist/CommonRecovery">
  <title>CommonRecovery</title>
  <link>http://moglen.law.columbia.edu/twiki/bin/view/EngLegalHist/CommonRecovery</link>
  <description>BeckyPrebble 21 Oct 2008 How was it that the common recovery was so effective? From today's perspective (which I realize is entirely the wrong way to look at it) ... (last changed by BeckyPrebble)</description>
  <dc:date>2008-10-21T13:25:05Z</dc:date>
  <dc:contributor>
    <rdf:Description link="http://moglen.law.columbia.edu/twiki/bin/view?topic=Main.BeckyPrebble">
      <rdf:value>BeckyPrebble</rdf:value>
    </rdf:Description>
  </dc:contributor>
</item>
<!-- <ul>
<li> Set SKIN = rss
</li></ul> 
--></rdf:RDF>