Law in Contemporary Society

View   r2  >  r1  ...
TheSocraticMethod 2 - 19 Jan 2021 - Main.MaryamAsenuga
Line: 1 to 1
 
META TOPICPARENT name="ElizabethOseiJournal"

-- ElizabethOsei - 18 Jan 2021

Added:
>
>

I completely agree, Liz! The anxiety that is caused by the cold-calls sometimes distracts me from actually absorbing the knowledge the professor is saying.

Although I do see the value in thinking on your feet, a tool I have seen come in handy during my moot court competitions this past weekend, it is a form of teaching that has always perplexed me. Great entry; it really articulated a lot of the feelings I have been experiencing! Best, Maryam Asenuga

-- MaryamAsenuga - 19 Jan 2021

 
 
<--/commentPlugin-->

I am not a fan. Even before applying to law school, I knew about "cold calls." I remember friends telling me about their apprehension of applying to law school simply because of the Socratic method. I thought it was weird that they would allow something so trivial, so small deter them from becoming an attorney. However, the day before I was "on-call" for my Civil Procedure Class, that fear was realized. We've been exploring what it is to be creative in law school, and to me, only our Professors are allowed to be creative using this method. I imagine our Professors have an exact answer or path they want us to follow when they ask their questions. In one of my doctrinal classes, my Professor explicitly told me he wanted me to read his mind. I am still recovering from that trauma.


TheSocraticMethod 1 - 18 Jan 2021 - Main.ElizabethOsei
Line: 1 to 1
Added:
>
>
META TOPICPARENT name="ElizabethOseiJournal"

-- ElizabethOsei - 18 Jan 2021

 
<--/commentPlugin-->

I am not a fan. Even before applying to law school, I knew about "cold calls." I remember friends telling me about their apprehension of applying to law school simply because of the Socratic method. I thought it was weird that they would allow something so trivial, so small deter them from becoming an attorney. However, the day before I was "on-call" for my Civil Procedure Class, that fear was realized. We've been exploring what it is to be creative in law school, and to me, only our Professors are allowed to be creative using this method. I imagine our Professors have an exact answer or path they want us to follow when they ask their questions. In one of my doctrinal classes, my Professor explicitly told me he wanted me to read his mind. I am still recovering from that trauma.

My problem with the Socratic method is that I think it does more for the Professor than for the students. Professors get insight into how well students "perform" on the spot. However, I spend all class worried and anxious that I might be called on to explain some nuance that I do not understand or recall a small fact from one of the 10 cases I read days ago. After going through it last semester, I realized I never remembered anything from my cold call; I would always blackout--apparently, this was something familiar among many of my peers. Which leads me to ask, why do we still use it? I found absolutely no correlation between cold call performance and test performance. With test performance culminating in most if not all of our grades--why do we still use the Socratic method? Voluntary participation, rather than random cold calls, can accomplish learning the law just as well, or perhaps even better. Volunteering can enable students to gain more confidence in understanding the law and eliminate most of the anxiety that entirely only deter/get in the way of learning. I am all for abandoning tradition for the sake of efficiency and effectiveness.


Revision 2r2 - 19 Jan 2021 - 05:16:35 - MaryamAsenuga
Revision 1r1 - 18 Jan 2021 - 21:53:52 - ElizabethOsei
This site is powered by the TWiki collaboration platform.
All material on this collaboration platform is the property of the contributing authors.
All material marked as authored by Eben Moglen is available under the license terms CC-BY-SA version 4.
Syndicate this site RSSATOM