Law in Contemporary Society

View   r16  >  r15  ...
ClassNotes17Jan08 16 - 19 Jan 2008 - Main.AdamCarlis
Line: 1 to 1
 
META TOPICPARENT name="WebPreferences"
1-17-08 - Thursday
Line: 121 to 121
 

-- StephenClarke - 19 Jan 2008

Added:
>
>

My guess, Steve, and I really think you are on to something, is that is why Eban talked about meditation. While he mentioned "reading" Shakespeare, I have a feeling that a line would be drawn somewhere in his theory when the audience stops being an active, thinking participant and becomes a mindless consumer, or worse, a mindless nothing.

But, the slope is slippery. Reading Shakespeare, good for the memory. Reading Kant, also good. What about Tom Clancey?

I think this gets to Daniel's point about it isn't so much what medium (print, audio, visual, etc.), but what you do with that medium. The only way this is not the case is if there is something inherently different about watching something on a screen that is distinct from seeing it in person, hearing it, or reading the words. If I don't want to "veg out," but do want to laugh, can I read the script from The Simpsons?

-- AdamCarlis - 19 Jan 2008

 
 
<--/commentPlugin-->

Revision 16r16 - 19 Jan 2008 - 03:51:01 - AdamCarlis
Revision 15r15 - 19 Jan 2008 - 02:17:16 - StephenClarke
This site is powered by the TWiki collaboration platform.
All material on this collaboration platform is the property of the contributing authors.
All material marked as authored by Eben Moglen is available under the license terms CC-BY-SA version 4.
Syndicate this site RSSATOM