Higher Education Debt: Is It Truly Good Debt?

The Problem

Undergraduate Debt

Graduate Debt

Is the Incursion of Debt Avoidable?

How is the Debt Avoidable

Unfortunately, for graduate school the incursion of debt is virtually unavoidable since working during school is less of a possibility and tuition is drastically higher. Not only is working during the school year less of a possibility because of the academic pressure, but some programs even bar it. For example until recently the American Bar Association limited 1L’s to only being able to work 20 hours a week. (See ABA’s New Standards, where the ABA lifted this restriction but made clear that law schools may still fully limit the ability of 1L’s to work)

The Downsides of Working to Avoid Debt

There are two main downsides of working to avoid debt, the trading of one’s youth and the lack of ability to gain job experience. Undergraduate university and the summer and winter breaks that come with it are the last moments of one’s youth. Many Millennials, as evident by the vast incursion of debt amongst them, highly value living out their youths over paying tuition through work, especially when they can just take out "good" debt to do so. If an undergraduate decides its worth trading his or her youth they are then faced with deciding between a minimum wage job that will slowly help them avoid incurring debt or an unpaid internship that could provide valuable work experience and lead to gainful employment upon graduation. Again it is likely that many will choose the latter since its just "good" debt that they are incurring.

The Ramifications of Incurring Higher Education Debt

Even with the nauseating loan amounts many are quick to rise to defend the concept of higher education being “good” debt, which is why Millennials are not as hesitant about being able to finish living out their youths and incurring it. However, there are clear ramifications to incurring this “good” debt, which reveal how devastating it really can be.

Economic Strain

The lack of savings kills the economy. Instead of being able to use the potential increase in salary from the “good” debt of student loans to further invest in the economy, either through mortgages and home improvements or savvy stock market investments, the majority is forced to use any gain in paying off the student debt.

No Mortgages

Since graduates are crippled with student loans; even if they are able to secure a job, a large percentage of their income goes directly to the monthly loan payments. The loan payments on top of rent and other living expenses and necessities prevent recent graduates the ability to form any type of savings. With out a savings the Millennials have no opportunities to secure a mortgage, an actual good debt, and are forced to continue to throw away their income on rent and loan payments.

Pigeonholed

With the large debt looming over recent graduates, many are desperate to find any job that will provide them with the ability to make the monthly payments. Upon successfully finding a job many soon realize that their debt ball and chains them to the job, through the ever looming monthly payments.

Kills Creativity

The pigeonholing phenomenon that the “good” debt of higher education causes reaps in the death of creativity. While it may easily be argued creativity was dealt a crippling blow years before the Millennials’ debt actualized, the monthly loan payments dealt a final blow to the straw man that was left. Instead of dreaming of what more is to come, Millennials now crave the safe certainty their jobs provide all because of the “good” debt they had graciously accepted just years before.

I'm not sure how the rewrite is supposed to be responsive to my comments. "Millennials" are people, and between them and the generations that preceded them the distinction is not the desirability of higher education. In a world where a billionaire advertises the importance of funding startups by college dropouts, your talk of the impossibility of getting any job at all without a college degree sounds, as I said last time, like the transplantation of the problems suffered by people without your cognitive endowments and social advantages onto your own situation. I got my first job at the onset of the 1973-74 recession, without a high school diploma, when I was 14. I had a skill. I was a good learner. So are you, and everyone around you. But acquiring a skill that would allow you to work advantageously to pay for your education was not a priority for you, or you would have done it. Borrowing money against future earnings in order to get an education isn't a requirement for people of your talents and privileges. It's a choice. Whether it is a good choice or a bad choice can be discussed, analyzed, written about. But it has to be faced as what it is. I asked you to revise this essay to consider the matter as choice. You have returned another draft that once again slips this rather significant aspect of the situation.

We are not talking about the mass of people: we are talking about you. How you, with your powers and your resources, can strategize your life. If we are to fall back immediately into assertions about the average in the society, and how in a world of inequality those on the wrong side of the divide are trapped, then we are ignoring both your advantages and your responsibilities. That, for at least one course in the early part of law school, I am trying not to do. Please help me.