Law in Contemporary Society

View   r3  >  r2  ...
BeyondTranscendence 3 - 28 Feb 2012 - Main.SkylarPolansky
Line: 1 to 1
 

Beyond Transcendence

Reading Arnold’s description of the more active, non-rational, emotional basis of human behavior was great fun. It was difficult though, because I read his description holding the assumption that it was a criticism. I read it thinking that Arnold’s ideal was for the Thinking Man to cease to be a fiction, and for his readership to assume the vacancy that the Thinking Man pretends to fill. I read it assuming Arnold was calling for humanity to wake up and become emotionally detached Thinking Men.

Line: 19 to 19
 

-- AlexKonik - 16 Feb 2012

Added:
>
>
I think interestingly Mr. Brown is a perfect exemplification of who you propose the hero of our society is → the principled man, sacrificing everything for his principles (“Do unto others”), but one who accounts for [your interpretation of] Arnold’s criticism of such a man → for Mr. Brown the content and the logic of his creed are the most important things about it, or at least the driving factor that leads him to the act of freeing slaves. Seemingly Mr. Brown operates as a perfect example of a principled man who adhered to realism. Yet we killed him.

-- SkylarPolansky - 28 Feb 2012


Revision 3r3 - 28 Feb 2012 - 23:13:21 - SkylarPolansky
Revision 2r2 - 27 Feb 2012 - 14:10:18 - AlexKonik
This site is powered by the TWiki collaboration platform.
All material on this collaboration platform is the property of the contributing authors.
All material marked as authored by Eben Moglen is available under the license terms CC-BY-SA version 4.
Syndicate this site RSSATOM