Computers, Privacy & the Constitution

View   r9  >  r8  ...
BrianSSecondPaper 9 - 20 May 2010 - Main.EdwardBontkowski
Line: 1 to 1
 
META TOPICPARENT name="SecondPaper%25"
Ready for review. Comments welcome.
Line: 48 to 48
 
Added:
>
>

Brian,

Great article. I've honestly always wondered why clips that I thought were obviously fair use of copyrighted material were constantly being taken down on YouTube? . Now I know!

I'm kind of shocked that the fair use principles aren't already embodied in 512(c). Do you have any idea if this was just an oversight on the part of the drafters of if it was intentionally excluded?

As you noted, the "subjective bad faith standard" is an incredibly hard thing to prove. Does that the fact that a rightsholder who first resorted to private things methods such as ContentID? , was informed by YouTube? that the content was fair use, and then subsequently filed a DCMA claim make bad faith any easier to prove?

-- EdwardBontkowski - 20 May 2010

 
 
<--/commentPlugin-->

# * Set ALLOWTOPICVIEW = TWikiAdminGroup, BrianS


Revision 9r9 - 20 May 2010 - 03:02:53 - EdwardBontkowski
Revision 8r8 - 11 Apr 2010 - 06:59:51 - BrianS
This site is powered by the TWiki collaboration platform.
All material on this collaboration platform is the property of the contributing authors.
All material marked as authored by Eben Moglen is available under the license terms CC-BY-SA version 4.
Syndicate this site RSSATOM