Law in the Internet Society

View   r1
SupremeCourtJusticeGeorgeOrwell 1 - 10 Nov 2011 - Main.AlejandroMercado
Line: 1 to 1
Added:
>
>
META TOPICPARENT name="WebPreferences"
Attached is an article briefing the initial reaction by the Supreme Court on whether the use of GPS for surveillance purposes requires a warrant. I thought most interesting Justice Alito's following concerns: "Before the computer and internet age, much of the privacy that people enjoyed was not the result of legal or constitutional protections... but the result of the difficulty of traveling and gathering information." Does this mean the Justices might start recognizing constitutional protections in other contexts, not necessarily criminal?

-- AlejandroMercado - 10 Nov 2011

 
<--/commentPlugin-->

META FILEATTACHMENT attachment="Law_Technology_News:_Citing_Orwell_Supreme_Court_Appears_Wary_of_Police_GPS_Surveillance.pdf" attr="" comment="" date="1320901575" name="Law_Technology_News:_Citing_Orwell_Supreme_Court_Appears_Wary_of_Police_GPS_Surveillance.pdf" path="Law Technology News: Citing Orwell Supreme Court Appears Wary of Police GPS Surveillance.pdf" size="105297" stream="Law Technology News: Citing Orwell Supreme Court Appears Wary of Police GPS Surveillance.pdf" user="Main.AlejandroMercado" version="1"

Revision 1r1 - 10 Nov 2011 - 05:06:16 - AlejandroMercado
This site is powered by the TWiki collaboration platform.
All material on this collaboration platform is the property of the contributing authors.
All material marked as authored by Eben Moglen is available under the license terms CC-BY-SA version 4.
Syndicate this site RSSATOM