Law in the Internet Society

View   r7  >  r6  ...
StevenHwangPaper2 7 - 19 Feb 2009 - Main.StevenHwang
Line: 1 to 1
 
META TOPICPARENT name="WebPreferences"
Comment: As I mentioned in the comments below, the heart (and point) of the previous essay WAS the point of view argument, so stripping it of that left it with just a basic overview of network neutrality--which I don't think adds anything to the discussion.
Line: 39 to 39
 
Added:
>
>
  • Thanks for the prompt comment, professor. Just a quick question--is the problem here just about the way I describe the "current" state of affairs? I stated that "certain types of discriminatory network management may in fact be beneficial, but focus my essay on the potential harms." I use "neutrality" and "net neutrality" loosely in my essay to encompass beneficial and neutral discrimination. Yes, this is a distinction that I admit is misleading and erroneously so, and I'm happy to clarify that in another rewrite. However, I'm confused as to whether there is a deeper flaw going on here. I don't think my paper hinges on neutrality at all; its main point is that there is the potential for social harm in abusive discrimination by ISPs. Please let me know so that I can rewrite appropriately.
 

Net Neutrality and Social Equality

Net Neutrality


Revision 7r7 - 19 Feb 2009 - 05:46:25 - StevenHwang
Revision 6r6 - 18 Feb 2009 - 22:04:36 - EbenMoglen
This site is powered by the TWiki collaboration platform.
All material on this collaboration platform is the property of the contributing authors.
All material marked as authored by Eben Moglen is available under the license terms CC-BY-SA version 4.
Syndicate this site RSSATOM