Law in the Internet Society

View   r9  >  r8  ...
JoseMariaDelajaraFirstEssay 9 - 11 Oct 2019 - Main.JoseMariaDelajara
Line: 1 to 1
 
META TOPICPARENT name="FirstEssay"
Line: 10 to 10
 Support for open government is growing. However, the progress in opening judicial data sets has been slower than that of the legislative and executive branches. The main fear of judicial officers seems to be the perception that new technologies (i.e. data analytics) could have adverse effects on the employee's job. In other words, judges seem to be worried that data analytics will show their decisions as they really are: irrational yet predictable. When we face the complete picture of our flawed justice system, will we still accept it?
Changed:
<
<

Open justice = access to justice

>
>

Open justice

 Open data in the judiciary resides on three principles: (1) transparency, (2) seeking citizen participation (3) and institutional collaboration. According to Elena, an open justice system should at least publish (1) court rulings, (2) statistics regarding the performance of courts and (3) budget allocation information. Also, that data should be both legally and technically open. Citizens would need to be allowed to freely access, reuse and distribute the data, which should be made available in a machine-readable format and in bulk.

Revision 9r9 - 11 Oct 2019 - 14:05:39 - JoseMariaDelajara
Revision 8r8 - 11 Oct 2019 - 02:29:23 - JoseMariaDelajara
This site is powered by the TWiki collaboration platform.
All material on this collaboration platform is the property of the contributing authors.
All material marked as authored by Eben Moglen is available under the license terms CC-BY-SA version 4.
Syndicate this site RSSATOM