Thompson, Derek, Why Surveillance Is the Climate Change of the Internet, The Atlantic, May 9, 2019

Tambini, Damian, "Social Media Power and Election Legitimacy.” Digital Dominance: The Power of Google, Amazon, Facebook, and Apple" (pp. 265-293), Oxford University Press, 2018

Barry Lynn, I criticized Google. It got me fired. That’s how corporate power works., Washington Post, August 31, 2017

-- MichaelWeholt - 05 Sep 2017

<-- Links in this section good as of 8/4/17 -->

EPIC Files FTC Complaint to Stop Google from Tracking In-Store Purchases, Electronic Privacy Information Center, July 31, 2017 (pdf of Complaint)

Where Credit is Due

Alistair Croll, Big data is our generation’s civil rights issue, and we don’t know it, O'Reilly Radar, August 2, 2012

Stat oil: Lenders are turning to social media to assess borrowers, The Economist, February 9 2013

Tom Simonite, Sell Your Personal Data for $8 a Month, MIT Technology Review, February 12, 2014

Shannon Pettypiece and Jordan Robertson, Hospitals Are Mining Patients' Credit Card Data to Predict Who Will Get Sick, Bloomberg Business, July 03, 2014

An example of actually paying with your attention: http://socialcommercetoday.com/pay-with-a-tweet-pay-with-a-like-new-social-payments-platforms/

-- AlexeySokolin - 28 Oct 2011

Since this course is about the “end of the world,” I thought a bit of humor (The Onion) would be appropriate here –- to break the ice. Although humor can function in many different ways (e.g. by increasing or decreasing the psychological distances between people in groups), I hope its use as a defense mechanism in this case is mature in the sense that it might facilitate group discussion by easing tension. See generally, http://www.ehow.com/how_2294835_use-humor-as-defense-mechanism.html

A few initial impressions from class:

Professor Moglen’s thesis, at this early point in the course, seems to revolve around a kind of theoretical utopia of social transformation, which necessarily adds unexplored socio-psychological propositions to his argument. As of now, I am unclear as to the extent of these propositions.

If the internet is a social condition of interconnection, and if we presume for the sake of argument that the ideal condition is one that is absent of any controlling intermediary, what then is an accurate description of the resulting social transformation that evolves over time? Is there a social end-product? How long might it take until that product is ripe, and why is that product desirable?

Presumably, public networks (that do not currently exist) would house this ideal social condition of interconnection. Software and content that were once proprietary would now be shared, and citizens would be able to learn from each other in relatively unimpeded network space.

Although the following thought is not yet fully formed, I would wager that a general deficiency of altruism throughout humankind is the greatest threat to Moglen’s utopia. Ultimately, human beings have a range of both individual and social desires, and happiness is derived from the satisfaction of these desires. Given the previous sentence, one might be inclined to debate the contours of human nature at this point -- a worthwhile debate -- but it is difficult to argue with the concept of a roughly stable normal curve that governs the variance of nearly all human traits. If the median of an altruism-narcissism normal curve is too narcissistic, Moglen’s utopia of public networks and unimpeded social transformation may never survive the democratic process. For some, if not most, I imagine it just feels really, really good to design a software program (or a 3rd grade curriculum plan for that matter) and then experience the self-derived “honor” that accompanies ownership and profits.

-- JonathanBoyer - 23 Sep 2009

Student suggestion for future years

E Pluribus Unum

Thomas L. Friedman, The Mouse That Roars: A Global Tale, New York Times, July 18, 1998

Douglas Jehl, Islamic World Opens Door to the Internet, but Restrictions Are Many, New York Times, March 18, 1999

Robert Wright, Private Eyes, New York Times, September 5, 1999

David J. Wallace, World Game Achieves Inventor's Vision of Global Play, New York Times, October 3, 1997

Jodi Wilgoren, Snow Day Is for Surfing as Pupils Play on Internet, New York Times, January 15, 1999

Jason Chervokas & Tom Watson, A Wired Generation Comes of Age on the Net, New York Times, October 31, 1997

Victoria's Secret, A Sex Metaphor, New York Times, February 5, 1999

Alice McInnes, The Agency of The InfoZone: Exploring the Effects of a Community Network, First Monday, February 1997

Angela Lewis, Hoax E-mails and Bonsai Kittens: Are You E-literate in the Docuverse?, First Monday, August 2002

John Schwartz, Professors Vie With Web for Class's Attention, New York Times, January 2, 2003

Michael Dorf, Laptops in the Classroom, November 2006

Having a Theory

Michael H. Goldhaber, The Attention Economy: The Natural Economy of the Net, First Monday, April 1997

Rishab Aiyer Ghosh, Economics is dead. Long live economics!, First Monday, May 1997

Philippe Aigrain, Attention, Media, Value and Economics, First Monday, September 1997

Rishab Aiyer Ghosh, Cooking Pot Markets: An Economic Model for the Trade in Free Goods and Services on the Internet, First Monday, March 1998

Terrence A. Maxwell, Is Copyright Necessary?, First Monday, September 2004.

<--/commentPlugin-->