Law in the Internet Society

View   r9  >  r8  >  r7  >  r6  >  r5  >  r4  ...
FacebookCausesLossOfHealthcareBenefits 9 - 07 Sep 2011 - Main.IanSullivan
Line: 1 to 1
Changed:
<
<
META TOPICPARENT name="LawNetSoc"
>
>
META TOPICPARENT name="ClassMaterials2009"
 http://mashable.com/2009/11/22/facebook-health-benefits/

"A Canadian woman claims she has lost her health benefits after her insurance company used her Facebook pictures as evidence that she was no longer depressed."


FacebookCausesLossOfHealthcareBenefits 8 - 30 Nov 2009 - Main.IanSullivan
Line: 1 to 1
Changed:
<
<
META TOPICPARENT name="WebPreferences"
>
>
META TOPICPARENT name="LawNetSoc"
 http://mashable.com/2009/11/22/facebook-health-benefits/

"A Canadian woman claims she has lost her health benefits after her insurance company used her Facebook pictures as evidence that she was no longer depressed."


FacebookCausesLossOfHealthcareBenefits 7 - 26 Nov 2009 - Main.BrianS
Line: 1 to 1
 
META TOPICPARENT name="WebPreferences"
http://mashable.com/2009/11/22/facebook-health-benefits/
Line: 32 to 32
 

-- MakalikaNaholowaa - 26 Nov 2009

Added:
>
>

Thanks for posting this. It's a nice example to be able to cite.

-- BrianS - 26 Nov 2009

 
 
<--/commentPlugin-->
\ No newline at end of file

FacebookCausesLossOfHealthcareBenefits 6 - 26 Nov 2009 - Main.MakalikaNaholowaa
Line: 1 to 1
 
META TOPICPARENT name="WebPreferences"
http://mashable.com/2009/11/22/facebook-health-benefits/
Line: 26 to 26
 I have posted this link http://mashable.com/2009/11/22/facebook-health-benefits/ on my Facebook “wall” with a short explanation about the lack of privacy on Facebook in general. I agree with Steven regarding his analysis of the particular facts of the woman in the article. However, I strongly believe that people should be aware of the lack of privacy on Facebook so that they can make informed choices about how it should be used. Toward that end I encourage each of you to post this link and an explanation on your Facebook walls.

-- BrettJohnson - 26 Nov 2009

Added:
>
>

More FB news (which isn't directly related to the health insurance story) - Facebook has set up dual class stock in preparation for the IPO its not planning to have: http://www.nytimes.com/2009/11/25/technology/internet/25facebook.html?ref=technology

-- MakalikaNaholowaa - 26 Nov 2009

 
 
<--/commentPlugin-->
\ No newline at end of file

FacebookCausesLossOfHealthcareBenefits 5 - 26 Nov 2009 - Main.BrettJohnson
Line: 1 to 1
 
META TOPICPARENT name="WebPreferences"
http://mashable.com/2009/11/22/facebook-health-benefits/
Line: 21 to 21
 Recognizing that my claim was flawed, I would like to ask, "Why is it bad that this evidence is included?" I think that it violates people's privacy. However, does it do more than that? Besides the violation of privacy, is it more likely to cause injustice? The ideal insurance company would recognize and pay out all sound claims and reject all fraudulent claims. I feel like this does not work against that end.

-- StevenWu - 24 Nov 2009

Added:
>
>

I have posted this link http://mashable.com/2009/11/22/facebook-health-benefits/ on my Facebook “wall” with a short explanation about the lack of privacy on Facebook in general. I agree with Steven regarding his analysis of the particular facts of the woman in the article. However, I strongly believe that people should be aware of the lack of privacy on Facebook so that they can make informed choices about how it should be used. Toward that end I encourage each of you to post this link and an explanation on your Facebook walls.

-- BrettJohnson - 26 Nov 2009

 
 
<--/commentPlugin-->
\ No newline at end of file

FacebookCausesLossOfHealthcareBenefits 4 - 24 Nov 2009 - Main.StevenWu
Line: 1 to 1
 
META TOPICPARENT name="WebPreferences"
http://mashable.com/2009/11/22/facebook-health-benefits/
Line: 14 to 14
 -- JustinColannino - 24 Nov 2009
Added:
>
>

Do you think that photographic evidence found on Facebook would be excluded on these grounds? "its probative value is substantially outweighed by the danger of unfair prejudice, confusion of the issues, or misleading the jury, or by considerations of undue delay, waste of time, or needless presentation of cumulative evidence." I was making a general, overly broad and ultimately incorrect claim.

Recognizing that my claim was flawed, I would like to ask, "Why is it bad that this evidence is included?" I think that it violates people's privacy. However, does it do more than that? Besides the violation of privacy, is it more likely to cause injustice? The ideal insurance company would recognize and pay out all sound claims and reject all fraudulent claims. I feel like this does not work against that end.

-- StevenWu - 24 Nov 2009

 
 
<--/commentPlugin-->
\ No newline at end of file

FacebookCausesLossOfHealthcareBenefits 3 - 24 Nov 2009 - Main.JustinColannino
Line: 1 to 1
 
META TOPICPARENT name="WebPreferences"
http://mashable.com/2009/11/22/facebook-health-benefits/
Line: 6 to 6
 -- MichaelDignan - 23 Nov 2009
Added:
>
>
It seems like the more evidence a jury has, the more likely it is that they will make the correct decision.
 
Added:
>
>
-- StevenWu - 24 Nov 2009
 
Added:
>
>
Steven - I am pretty sure that the rules of evidence explicitly recognize that that is not the case.
 
Changed:
<
<
It seems like the more evidence a jury has, the more likely it is that they will make the correct decision.
>
>
-- JustinColannino - 24 Nov 2009
 
Deleted:
<
<
-- StevenWu - 24 Nov 2009
 
 
<--/commentPlugin-->

FacebookCausesLossOfHealthcareBenefits 2 - 24 Nov 2009 - Main.StevenWu
Line: 1 to 1
 
META TOPICPARENT name="WebPreferences"
http://mashable.com/2009/11/22/facebook-health-benefits/
Line: 7 to 7
 -- MichaelDignan - 23 Nov 2009
Added:
>
>

It seems like the more evidence a jury has, the more likely it is that they will make the correct decision.

-- StevenWu - 24 Nov 2009

 
 
<--/commentPlugin-->

FacebookCausesLossOfHealthcareBenefits 1 - 23 Nov 2009 - Main.MichaelDignan
Line: 1 to 1
Added:
>
>
META TOPICPARENT name="WebPreferences"
http://mashable.com/2009/11/22/facebook-health-benefits/

"A Canadian woman claims she has lost her health benefits after her insurance company used her Facebook pictures as evidence that she was no longer depressed."

-- MichaelDignan - 23 Nov 2009

 
<--/commentPlugin-->

Revision 9r9 - 07 Sep 2011 - 00:50:12 - IanSullivan
Revision 8r8 - 30 Nov 2009 - 23:46:54 - IanSullivan
Revision 7r7 - 26 Nov 2009 - 23:04:03 - BrianS
Revision 6r6 - 26 Nov 2009 - 09:21:11 - MakalikaNaholowaa
Revision 5r5 - 26 Nov 2009 - 03:05:29 - BrettJohnson
Revision 4r4 - 24 Nov 2009 - 20:57:38 - StevenWu
Revision 3r3 - 24 Nov 2009 - 16:46:03 - JustinColannino
Revision 2r2 - 24 Nov 2009 - 15:52:08 - StevenWu
Revision 1r1 - 23 Nov 2009 - 20:56:20 - MichaelDignan
This site is powered by the TWiki collaboration platform.
All material on this collaboration platform is the property of the contributing authors.
All material marked as authored by Eben Moglen is available under the license terms CC-BY-SA version 4.
Syndicate this site RSSATOM