|
DonnaZamirSecondEssay 8 - 28 Jan 2020 - Main.DonnaZamir
|
| |
| META TOPICPARENT | name="SecondEssay" |
|---|
Psychological Aspects of Allowing our Cybersurveillance and Data-Collection | | | We are all being cyber-surveilled - this is a well-known fact to many people, especially to the students in this course.
| |
<
< | An overwhelmingly large amount of data about us is continuously and constantly extracted from our laptops, cellphones and other digital devices, and is used by, and traded between, numerous entities, even without our knowledge. | >
> | An overwhelmingly large amount of data about us is constantly extracted from our laptops, cellphones and other digital devices, and is used by, and traded between, numerous entities, even without our knowledge. | | |
Although we are all aware, to some extent, of this phenomenon - we nonetheless continue to addictively and habitually use our devices, and permit this constant surveillance and information collection to occur.
This situation positions us in cognitive dissonance, which is common in many other contexts of addictions, such as addiction to abusive substances - people know it can be destructive to their lives, but they nonetheless continue to consume these products. | |
<
< | One fundamental question in this regard is: why do we do this? Don't we know better? | >
> | One fundamental question is: why do we do this? Don't we know better? | | | Throughout the course, it was suggested that some psychological aspects underly this "cybersurveillance cognitive dissonance", such as the need to reduce anxiety; FOMO; and repression and denial of the ramifications of our data-surveillance. | | | Optimism Bias | |
<
< | One example of what is largely defined as "positive illusions", is the "optimism bias" (or unrealistic optimism), i.e. a judgment bias which tends to affect people's subjective estimates of the likelihood of future events in their lives, causes people to overestimate the likelihood of positive events, and to underestimate the likelihood of negative events, especially in comparison to other people. | >
> | One example of what is largely defined as "positive illusions", is the "optimism bias" (or unrealistic optimism), i.e. a judgment bias which tends to affect people's subjective estimates of the likelihood of future events in their lives, causes them to overestimate the likelihood of positive events, and to underestimate the likelihood of negative events, especially in comparison to other people. | | | Studies have found that approximately 80% of the population display optimism bias in some instances, documented across various characteristics, including gender, age, nationality, and profession. | | | Present Bias | |
<
< | The "present bias" is the tendency of people to focus on the "here and now" – namely, to over-estimate the value of immediate rewards, at the expense of long-term, equivalent or greater benefits. | >
> | The "present bias", simply put, is the tendency of people to focus on the "here and now" – namely, to over-estimate the value of immediate rewards, at the expense of long-term, equivalent or greater benefits. | | | Interestingly,this bias was raised in the context of environmental law and the notion of intergenerational justice. Thus, despite the fact that people expressly claim they care about the environment and want to leave the world in good condition for future generations – they nonetheless discount environmental risks, and their future manifestation, to a greater degree than can be rationally defended. | | | Groupthink | |
<
< | Another relevant psychological effect is "groupthink", a phenomenon which occurs when a group of people, of various sizes, make irrational or non-optimal decisions; among other reasons, due to a desire to create harmony and conformity within the group. In this situation, group members tend neither to express doubts and judgment, nor to disagree with the group consensus, while possibly ignoring prospective ethical or moral consequences. | >
> | Another relevant psychological effect is "groupthink", a phenomenon which occurs when a group of people, of various sizes, make irrational or non-optimal decisions; among other reasons, due to a desire to create harmony and conformity within the group. In this situation, group members tend neither to express doubts and judgments, nor to disagree with the group consensus, while possibly ignoring prospective ethical or moral consequences. | | | | |
<
< | Implementing this phenomenon in the cybersurveillance perspective, it can be suggested that, when confronted with explicit information regarding our cybersurveillance - we dismiss or diminish our doubts and reservations on the matter, in order to conform and harmonize with the rest of our cyber-surveilled peers. We do so, even if cybersurveillance contradicts our most fundamental values, such as the right to autonomy and privacy | >
> | Implementing this phenomenon in the cybersurveillance perspective, it can be suggested that, when confronted with explicit information regarding our cybersurveillance - we dismiss or diminish our doubts and reservations on the matter, in order to conform and harmonize with the rest of our cyber-surveilled peers. We do so, even if cybersurveillance contradicts our most fundamental values, such as the right to autonomy and privacy. | | | Can We Reduce the Biases? | | | Yet, we can still hope that public awareness regarding the perils of our cybersurveillance will be further raised through alternative, interest-free, communication channels, before it is too late to do something about it (although admittedly, this aspiration might be optimistically biased). | |
<
< | Personally, having participated in this course, and especially writing this essay, I became much more aware of both existing and future hazards of cybersurveillance, and to the underlying biases which allow, and even encourage, me to ignore these hazards. Thus, I have sincerely been struggling with these biases and been trying to change my (as well as my family and friends) cyber-usage. For instance, I switched to a more secure browser; I turned off any apparent) option on my smartphone to collect information about my location, media content, etc.; and, generally, I think twice before clicking on any online content I encounter (while formerly, I habitually clicked on almost every link I was interested in, with no hesitation). | >
> | Personally, having participated in this course, and especially writing this essay, I became much more aware of both existing and future hazards of cybersurveillance, and to the underlying biases which allow, and even encourage, me to ignore these hazards. Thus, I have sincerely been struggling with these biases and been trying to change my (as well as my family's and friends') cyber-usage. For instance, I switched to a more secure browser; I turned off any (apparent) option on my smartphone to collect information about my location, media content, etc.; and, generally, I now think twice before clicking on any online content I encounter (while formerly, I habitually clicked on almost every link I found interesting, with no hesitation). | | |
While I am well-aware that this is just a drop in the bucket (yet, bad habits are hard to break), I hope to continue to confront my biases, and to use more secured cyber devices in a more conscious manner.
|
|
|
DonnaZamirSecondEssay 7 - 27 Jan 2020 - Main.DonnaZamir
|
| |
| META TOPICPARENT | name="SecondEssay" |
|---|
Psychological Aspects of Allowing our Cybersurveillance and Data-Collection | | | The Cybersurveillance Cognitive Dissonance | |
<
< | We are all being cyber-surveilled – this is a well-known fact to many people, especially to the students of this course. | >
> | We are all being cyber-surveilled - this is a well-known fact to many people, especially to the students in this course. | | | | |
<
< | An overwhelmingly large amount of data about us is continuously and constantly extracted from our laptops, cellphones and other digital devices, and is used by, and traded between, numerous entities (both public as well as private), even without our knowledge. | >
> | An overwhelmingly large amount of data about us is continuously and constantly extracted from our laptops, cellphones and other digital devices, and is used by, and traded between, numerous entities, even without our knowledge. | | | | |
<
< | Although we are all aware, to some extent, of this phenomenon – we nonetheless continue to addictively and habitually use our devices, and permit this constant surveillance and information collection to occur. | >
> | Although we are all aware, to some extent, of this phenomenon - we nonetheless continue to addictively and habitually use our devices, and permit this constant surveillance and information collection to occur. | | | | |
<
< | This situation positions us in cognitive dissonance, which is common in many other contexts of addictions, such as addiction to abusive substances or cigarettes – people know it can be destructive to their lives, but they nonetheless continue to consume these products. | >
> | This situation positions us in cognitive dissonance, which is common in many other contexts of addictions, such as addiction to abusive substances - people know it can be destructive to their lives, but they nonetheless continue to consume these products. | | | One fundamental question in this regard is: why do we do this? Don't we know better? | |
<
< | Throughout the course, it was suggested that some psychological aspects underly this "cybersurveillance cognitive dissonance", such as the need to reduce anxiety; FOMO; repression and denial of the ramifications of our data-surveillance; and difficulty to delay gratifications. | >
> | Throughout the course, it was suggested that some psychological aspects underly this "cybersurveillance cognitive dissonance", such as the need to reduce anxiety; FOMO; and repression and denial of the ramifications of our data-surveillance. | | | | |
<
< | Drawing on these discussions, other psychological aspects will be offered to further elucidate this cognitive dissonance, and to try to explain the reasons for this "irrational" behavior. | >
> | Drawing on these discussions, other psychological aspects will be offered to further elucidate this cognitive dissonance, and to attempt to explain the reasons for this "irrational" behavior. | | | Optimism Bias | |
<
< | One example of what is largely defined as "positive illusions", is the "optimism bias" (or unrealistic optimism), i.e. a judgment bias that tends to affect people's subjective estimates of the likelihood of future events in their lives, causes people to overestimate the likelihood of positive events in their lives, and to underestimate the likelihood of negative events, especially in comparison to other people. | >
> | One example of what is largely defined as "positive illusions", is the "optimism bias" (or unrealistic optimism), i.e. a judgment bias which tends to affect people's subjective estimates of the likelihood of future events in their lives, causes people to overestimate the likelihood of positive events, and to underestimate the likelihood of negative events, especially in comparison to other people. | | | | |
<
< | Studies have found that approximately 80% of the population display optimism bias in some instances, and it was documented across various characteristics, including gender, age, nationality, and profession. | >
> | Studies have found that approximately 80% of the population display optimism bias in some instances, documented across various characteristics, including gender, age, nationality, and profession. | | | | |
<
< | For example, empirical research shows that people believe they are less prone than others to health risks from their cellphones; smokers believe they have a lower risk of developing lung cancer than the average smoker; and students expect to receive higher starting salaries and more job offers than they eventually receive. | >
> | For example, empirical research shows that people believe they are less prone than others to health risks caused by their cellphones; smokers believe they have a lower risk of developing lung cancer than the average smoker; and students expect to receive higher starting salaries and more job offers than they eventually receive. | | | | |
<
< | Similarly, this bias can help explain why people who are aware of themselves being constantly surveilled and their behavior being collected and traded, do not do anything about it – they just do not believe that any harm could come to them; to other people – maybe, but not to them. Thus, when we, here in the U.S., read news reports (if we read them at all) about viruses targeting Hong Kong protestors' iPhones; or about people who their WhatsApp accounts have been hacked in India – we might just tell ourselves that it is not going to happen to us, just because we are "us" (and not "them"). | >
> | This bias can help explain why people, who are aware that they are constantly being surveilled and their behavior being collected and traded, don't do anything about it - they deny and do not believe that any harm could come to them; perhaps to other people, but not to them. Thus, when we, here in the U.S., read news reports (if we indeed read them at all) about viruses targeting Hong Kong protestors' iPhones; or about people whose WhatsApp accounts have been hacked in India – we might just tell ourselves that it is not going to happen to us, just because we are "us" (and not "them"). | | | Present Bias | |
<
< | The "present bias" (or the "discounting the future" bias) is the tendency of people to give stronger weight to benefits that are closer to the present time, while considering trade-offs between two future moments. In other words, people tend to focus on the "here and now" and to over-estimate the value of immediate rewards, at the expense of long-term, equivalent or higher benefits. | >
> | The "present bias" is the tendency of people to focus on the "here and now" – namely, to over-estimate the value of immediate rewards, at the expense of long-term, equivalent or greater benefits. | | | | |
<
< | This bias was raised in the context of environmental law and the notion of intergenerational justice. Thus, despite the fact that people expressly claim they care about the environment and want to leave the world in good condition for future generations – they nonetheless discount environmental risks, and their manifestation in the future, to a greater degree than can be rationally defended. | >
> | Interestingly,this bias was raised in the context of environmental law and the notion of intergenerational justice. Thus, despite the fact that people expressly claim they care about the environment and want to leave the world in good condition for future generations – they nonetheless discount environmental risks, and their future manifestation, to a greater degree than can be rationally defended. | | | | |
<
< | In a similar manner, even though people are aware of the future risks that cybersurveillance entails, they choose to discount these risks, and to reap the benefits of using their laptops and cellphones in the present. | >
> | Similarly, even though people are aware of the future risks that cybersurveillance entails, they choose to discount these risks, while reaping the immediate benefits of using their laptops and cellphones in the present. | | | Groupthink | |
<
< | Another relevant psychological effect is "groupthink", a phenomenon which occurs when a group of people – of various sizes – make irrational or non-optimal decisions; among other things, due to a desire to create harmony, coherence and conformity within the group. In this situation, group members tend to refrain from expressing doubts and judgments or disagreeing with the consensus, and may ignore prospective ethical or moral consequences. | >
> | Another relevant psychological effect is "groupthink", a phenomenon which occurs when a group of people, of various sizes, make irrational or non-optimal decisions; among other reasons, due to a desire to create harmony and conformity within the group. In this situation, group members tend neither to express doubts and judgment, nor to disagree with the group consensus, while possibly ignoring prospective ethical or moral consequences. | | | | |
<
< | Implementing this phenomenon in the context of the cybersurveillance cognitive dissonance, it can be suggested that when we are confronted with explicit information regarding our cybersurveillance – we dismiss or diminish our doubts and reservations on the matter, in order to conform and harmonize with the rest of our cyber-surveilled peers. We do so, even if cybersurveillance contradicts our most fundamental values, such as the right to autonomy and privacy. | >
> | Implementing this phenomenon in the cybersurveillance perspective, it can be suggested that, when confronted with explicit information regarding our cybersurveillance - we dismiss or diminish our doubts and reservations on the matter, in order to conform and harmonize with the rest of our cyber-surveilled peers. We do so, even if cybersurveillance contradicts our most fundamental values, such as the right to autonomy and privacy | | | Can We Reduce the Biases? | |
<
< | There is no doubt that the above-described psychological biases can be quite useful for our everyday lives – because, what could be better and more convenient than ignoring the numerous threats of the world; satisfying our current momentary desires; and conforming with the conduct of everyone around us? However, we all would agree that ignoring existing risks and potentially adverse future results of our behavior, can only last so long. | >
> | There is no doubt that the above-described psychological biases can be quite useful in our everyday lives; because, what can be better and more convenient than ignoring the world's numerous threats; satisfying our current momentary desires; and conforming with everyone around us? However, we all would agree that ignoring existing risks and potentially adverse future results, can only last so long. | | | | |
<
< | Thus, studies have offered several ways for reducing these biases. These mainly focus on raising awareness to, and emphasizing, the underlying risks and adverse outcomes of these biases; for instance, by providing people information about these risks in a salient and clear manner; highlighting the frequency and seriousness of these risks; and emphasizing that these risks are not confined to a specific group of individuals, but rather apply to everyone. | >
> | Studies have offered several ways for reducing these biases. These mainly focus on raising awareness to, and emphasizing, the underlying risks and adverse outcomes of these biases; for instance, by providing information about these risks in a salient and clear manner; highlighting their frequency and seriousness; and emphasizing that they are not confined to a specific group of individuals, but apply to everyone. | | | | |
<
< | However, due to the fact that our formal education, as well as the majority of information we consume, are mostly produced and controlled by the exact same entities which cyber-surveil us and collect our data (both governmental and commercial entities) – it seems much harder to raise awareness of these problems, and accordingly, to reduce our biases. | >
> | However, due to the fact that our formal education, as well as the information we consume, are mostly produced and controlled by the same entities (both governmental and commercial) which cyber-surveil and collect our data - it seems much harder to raise awareness of these problems, and accordingly, to reduce our biases.
Yet, we can still hope that public awareness regarding the perils of our cybersurveillance will be further raised through alternative, interest-free, communication channels, before it is too late to do something about it (although admittedly, this aspiration might be optimistically biased).
Personally, having participated in this course, and especially writing this essay, I became much more aware of both existing and future hazards of cybersurveillance, and to the underlying biases which allow, and even encourage, me to ignore these hazards. Thus, I have sincerely been struggling with these biases and been trying to change my (as well as my family and friends) cyber-usage. For instance, I switched to a more secure browser; I turned off any apparent) option on my smartphone to collect information about my location, media content, etc.; and, generally, I think twice before clicking on any online content I encounter (while formerly, I habitually clicked on almost every link I was interested in, with no hesitation).
While I am well-aware that this is just a drop in the bucket (yet, bad habits are hard to break), I hope to continue to confront my biases, and to use more secured cyber devices in a more conscious manner. | | | | |
<
< | Yet, we can still hope that awareness regarding the hazards of cybersurveillance will be raised through other communication channels, such as off-stream and interest-free media bodies, before it will be too late to do something about it (although, this aspiration might be optimistically biased). | | | |
|
|
DonnaZamirSecondEssay 6 - 19 Jan 2020 - Main.EbenMoglen
|
| |
| META TOPICPARENT | name="SecondEssay" |
|---|
Psychological Aspects of Allowing our Cybersurveillance and Data-Collection | | | However, due to the fact that our formal education, as well as the majority of information we consume, are mostly produced and controlled by the exact same entities which cyber-surveil us and collect our data (both governmental and commercial entities) – it seems much harder to raise awareness of these problems, and accordingly, to reduce our biases.
Yet, we can still hope that awareness regarding the hazards of cybersurveillance will be raised through other communication channels, such as off-stream and interest-free media bodies, before it will be too late to do something about it (although, this aspiration might be optimistically biased).
\ No newline at end of file | |
>
> |
It's a reasonable psychological catalog of relevant phenomena,
followed by the observation that teaching is what alters biases,
which are phenomena of a mind idling in neutral, not one that is
growing. Teaching that isn't accompanied by surveillance, then, is
the indicated direction of travel. The course in which the essay is
being written is an illustration. The wiki in which you are writing
(as opposed to the surveillance curriculum vehicle, Canvas) is an
illustration. Perhaps the next draft could deal with the growing
mind more self-consciously.
| | | \ No newline at end of file |
|
|
DonnaZamirSecondEssay 5 - 23 Dec 2019 - Main.DonnaZamir
|
| |
| META TOPICPARENT | name="SecondEssay" |
|---|
Psychological Aspects of Allowing our Cybersurveillance and Data-Collection | | |
Although we are all aware, to some extent, of this phenomenon – we nonetheless continue to addictively and habitually use our devices, and permit this constant surveillance and information collection to occur. | |
<
< | This situation positions us in cognitive dissonance, which is common in many other contexts of addictions, such as addiction to abusive substances or cigarettes – people know it can be destructive to them, but they nonetheless continue to consume these products. | >
> | This situation positions us in cognitive dissonance, which is common in many other contexts of addictions, such as addiction to abusive substances or cigarettes – people know it can be destructive to their lives, but they nonetheless continue to consume these products. | | | One fundamental question in this regard is: why do we do this? Don't we know better? |
|
|
DonnaZamirSecondEssay 4 - 09 Dec 2019 - Main.DonnaZamir
|
| |
| META TOPICPARENT | name="SecondEssay" |
|---|
Psychological Aspects of Allowing our Cybersurveillance and Data-Collection | | | Throughout the course, it was suggested that some psychological aspects underly this "cybersurveillance cognitive dissonance", such as the need to reduce anxiety; FOMO; repression and denial of the ramifications of our data-surveillance; and difficulty to delay gratifications.
| |
<
< | Drawing on these discussions, other psychological aspects will be offered to further elucidate this cognitive dissonance, and explain the reasons for this "irrational" behavior. | >
> | Drawing on these discussions, other psychological aspects will be offered to further elucidate this cognitive dissonance, and to try to explain the reasons for this "irrational" behavior. | | | Optimism Bias | | | There is no doubt that the above-described psychological biases can be quite useful for our everyday lives – because, what could be better and more convenient than ignoring the numerous threats of the world; satisfying our current momentary desires; and conforming with the conduct of everyone around us? However, we all would agree that ignoring existing risks and potentially adverse future results of our behavior, can only last so long. | |
<
< | Thus, studies have offered several ways for reducing the above-described biases. These mainly focus on raising awareness to, and emphasizing, the underlying risks and adverse outcomes of these biases; for instance, by providing people information about these risks in a salient manner; highlighting the frequency and seriousness of these risks; and emphasizing that these risks are not confined to a specific group of individuals, but rather apply to everyone. | >
> | Thus, studies have offered several ways for reducing these biases. These mainly focus on raising awareness to, and emphasizing, the underlying risks and adverse outcomes of these biases; for instance, by providing people information about these risks in a salient and clear manner; highlighting the frequency and seriousness of these risks; and emphasizing that these risks are not confined to a specific group of individuals, but rather apply to everyone. | | | | |
<
< | However, due to the fact that our formal education, as well as the majority of information we consume, are mostly produced and controlled by the exact same entities which cyber-surveil us and collect our data (both governmental and commercial entities) – it is much harder to raise awareness of these problems, and accordingly, to reduce our biases. | >
> | However, due to the fact that our formal education, as well as the majority of information we consume, are mostly produced and controlled by the exact same entities which cyber-surveil us and collect our data (both governmental and commercial entities) – it seems much harder to raise awareness of these problems, and accordingly, to reduce our biases. | | | Yet, we can still hope that awareness regarding the hazards of cybersurveillance will be raised through other communication channels, such as off-stream and interest-free media bodies, before it will be too late to do something about it (although, this aspiration might be optimistically biased).
\ No newline at end of file |
|
|
DonnaZamirSecondEssay 3 - 08 Dec 2019 - Main.DonnaZamir
|
| |
| META TOPICPARENT | name="SecondEssay" |
|---|
Psychological Aspects of Allowing our Cybersurveillance and Data-Collection | | | We are all being cyber-surveilled – this is a well-known fact to many people, especially to the students of this course. | |
<
< | An overwhelmingly amount of data about us is continuously and constantly extracted from our laptops, cellphones and other devices, and is shared and traded between numerous entities (both public as well as private), even without our knowledge. | >
> | An overwhelmingly large amount of data about us is continuously and constantly extracted from our laptops, cellphones and other digital devices, and is used by, and traded between, numerous entities (both public as well as private), even without our knowledge. | | | | |
<
< | Although we are all aware, to some extent, of this phenomenon – we nonetheless continue to addictively use our devices, and allow this constant surveillance and information collection. | >
> | Although we are all aware, to some extent, of this phenomenon – we nonetheless continue to addictively and habitually use our devices, and permit this constant surveillance and information collection to occur. | | | | |
<
< | This situation positions us in a cognitive dissonance, which is common in many other contexts of addictions, such as addiction to abusive substances or cigarettes – people know it can be destructive to them, but they nonetheless continue to consume these products. | >
> | This situation positions us in cognitive dissonance, which is common in many other contexts of addictions, such as addiction to abusive substances or cigarettes – people know it can be destructive to them, but they nonetheless continue to consume these products. | | | One fundamental question in this regard is: why do we do this? Don't we know better? | | | Optimism Bias | |
<
< | One example of what is largely defined as "positive illusions", is the "optimism bias" (or unrealistic optimism), i.e. a judgment bias that tends to affect people's subjective estimates of the likelihood of future events in their lives, causes people to overestimate the likelihood of positive events in their lives, and to underestimate the likelihood of negative events, especially with comparison to other people. | >
> | One example of what is largely defined as "positive illusions", is the "optimism bias" (or unrealistic optimism), i.e. a judgment bias that tends to affect people's subjective estimates of the likelihood of future events in their lives, causes people to overestimate the likelihood of positive events in their lives, and to underestimate the likelihood of negative events, especially in comparison to other people. | | | Studies have found that approximately 80% of the population display optimism bias in some instances, and it was documented across various characteristics, including gender, age, nationality, and profession. | | | However, due to the fact that our formal education, as well as the majority of information we consume, are mostly produced and controlled by the exact same entities which cyber-surveil us and collect our data (both governmental and commercial entities) – it is much harder to raise awareness of these problems, and accordingly, to reduce our biases. | |
<
< | Yet, we can still hope that awareness regarding the hazards of cybersurveillance will be raised through other communication channels, such as off-stream and interest-free media bodies, before it would be too late to do something about it (although, this aspiration might be optimistically biased). | >
> | Yet, we can still hope that awareness regarding the hazards of cybersurveillance will be raised through other communication channels, such as off-stream and interest-free media bodies, before it will be too late to do something about it (although, this aspiration might be optimistically biased). | | | \ No newline at end of file |
|
|
DonnaZamirSecondEssay 2 - 07 Dec 2019 - Main.DonnaZamir
|
| |
| META TOPICPARENT | name="SecondEssay" |
|---|
| |
>
> | Psychological Aspects of Allowing our Cybersurveillance and Data-Collection | | | | |
<
< | It is strongly recommended that you include your outline in the body of your essay by using the outline as section titles. The headings below are there to remind you how section and subsection titles are formatted. | >
> | -- By DonnaZamir - 06 Dec 2019 | | | | |
<
< | Paper Title | >
> | The Cybersurveillance Cognitive Dissonance | | | | |
<
< | -- By DonnaZamir - 06 Dec 2019 | >
> | We are all being cyber-surveilled – this is a well-known fact to many people, especially to the students of this course.
An overwhelmingly amount of data about us is continuously and constantly extracted from our laptops, cellphones and other devices, and is shared and traded between numerous entities (both public as well as private), even without our knowledge.
Although we are all aware, to some extent, of this phenomenon – we nonetheless continue to addictively use our devices, and allow this constant surveillance and information collection.
This situation positions us in a cognitive dissonance, which is common in many other contexts of addictions, such as addiction to abusive substances or cigarettes – people know it can be destructive to them, but they nonetheless continue to consume these products.
One fundamental question in this regard is: why do we do this? Don't we know better? | | | | |
>
> | Throughout the course, it was suggested that some psychological aspects underly this "cybersurveillance cognitive dissonance", such as the need to reduce anxiety; FOMO; repression and denial of the ramifications of our data-surveillance; and difficulty to delay gratifications. | | | | |
<
< | Section I | >
> | Drawing on these discussions, other psychological aspects will be offered to further elucidate this cognitive dissonance, and explain the reasons for this "irrational" behavior. | | | | |
<
< | Subsection A | >
> | Optimism Bias | | | | |
>
> | One example of what is largely defined as "positive illusions", is the "optimism bias" (or unrealistic optimism), i.e. a judgment bias that tends to affect people's subjective estimates of the likelihood of future events in their lives, causes people to overestimate the likelihood of positive events in their lives, and to underestimate the likelihood of negative events, especially with comparison to other people. | | | | |
<
< | Subsub 1 | >
> | Studies have found that approximately 80% of the population display optimism bias in some instances, and it was documented across various characteristics, including gender, age, nationality, and profession. | | | | |
<
< | Subsection B | >
> | For example, empirical research shows that people believe they are less prone than others to health risks from their cellphones; smokers believe they have a lower risk of developing lung cancer than the average smoker; and students expect to receive higher starting salaries and more job offers than they eventually receive. | | | | |
>
> | Similarly, this bias can help explain why people who are aware of themselves being constantly surveilled and their behavior being collected and traded, do not do anything about it – they just do not believe that any harm could come to them; to other people – maybe, but not to them. Thus, when we ,here in the U.S., read news reports (if we read them at all) about viruses targeting Hong Kong protestors' iPhones; or about people who their WhatsApp accounts have been hacked in India – we might just tell ourselves that it is not going to happen to us, just because we are "us" (and not "them"). | | | | |
<
< | Subsub 1 | >
> | Present Bias | | | | |
>
> | The "present bias" (or the "discounting the future" bias) is the tendency of people to give stronger weight to benefits that are closer to the present time, while considering trade-offs between two future moments. In other words, people tend to focus on the "here and now" and to over-estimate the value of immediate rewards, at the expense of long-term, equivalent or higher benefits. | | | | |
<
< | Subsub 2 | >
> | This bias was raised in the context of environmental law and the notion of intergenerational justice. Thus, despite the fact that people expressly claim they care about the environment and want to leave the world in good condition for future generations – they nonetheless discount environmental risks, and their manifestation in the future, to a greater degree than can be rationally defended. | | | | |
>
> | In a similar manner, even though people are aware of the future risks that cybersurveillance entails, they choose to discount these risks, and to reap the benefits of using their laptops and cellphones in the present. | | | | |
>
> | Groupthink | | | | |
<
< | Section II | >
> | Another relevant psychological effect is "groupthink", a phenomenon which occurs when a group of people – of various sizes – make irrational or non-optimal decisions; among other things, due to a desire to create harmony, coherence and conformity within the group. In this situation, group members tend to refrain from expressing doubts and judgments or disagreeing with the consensus, and may ignore prospective ethical or moral consequences. | | | | |
<
< | Subsection A | >
> | Implementing this phenomenon in the context of the cybersurveillance cognitive dissonance, it can be suggested that when we are confronted with explicit information regarding our cybersurveillance – we dismiss or diminish our doubts and reservations on the matter, in order to conform and harmonize with the rest of our cyber-surveilled peers. We do so, even if cybersurveillance contradicts our most fundamental values, such as the right to autonomy and privacy. | | | | |
<
< | Subsection B | >
> | Can We Reduce the Biases? | | | | |
>
> | There is no doubt that the above-described psychological biases can be quite useful for our everyday lives – because, what could be better and more convenient than ignoring the numerous threats of the world; satisfying our current momentary desires; and conforming with the conduct of everyone around us? However, we all would agree that ignoring existing risks and potentially adverse future results of our behavior, can only last so long. | | | | |
<
< |
You are entitled to restrict access to your paper if you want to. But we all derive immense benefit from reading one another's work, and I hope you won't feel the need unless the subject matter is personal and its disclosure would be harmful or undesirable.
To restrict access to your paper simply delete the "#" character on the next two lines: | >
> | Thus, studies have offered several ways for reducing the above-described biases. These mainly focus on raising awareness to, and emphasizing, the underlying risks and adverse outcomes of these biases; for instance, by providing people information about these risks in a salient manner; highlighting the frequency and seriousness of these risks; and emphasizing that these risks are not confined to a specific group of individuals, but rather apply to everyone. | | | | |
<
< | | >
> | However, due to the fact that our formal education, as well as the majority of information we consume, are mostly produced and controlled by the exact same entities which cyber-surveil us and collect our data (both governmental and commercial entities) – it is much harder to raise awareness of these problems, and accordingly, to reduce our biases. | | | | |
<
< | Note: TWiki has strict formatting rules for preference declarations. Make sure you preserve the three spaces, asterisk, and extra space at the beginning of these lines. If you wish to give access to any other users simply add them to the comma separated ALLOWTOPICVIEW list. | | | \ No newline at end of file | |
>
> | Yet, we can still hope that awareness regarding the hazards of cybersurveillance will be raised through other communication channels, such as off-stream and interest-free media bodies, before it would be too late to do something about it (although, this aspiration might be optimistically biased). |
|
|
DonnaZamirSecondEssay 1 - 06 Dec 2019 - Main.DonnaZamir
|
|
>
> |
| META TOPICPARENT | name="SecondEssay" |
|---|
It is strongly recommended that you include your outline in the body of your essay by using the outline as section titles. The headings below are there to remind you how section and subsection titles are formatted.
Paper Title
-- By DonnaZamir - 06 Dec 2019
Section I
Subsection A
Subsub 1
Subsection B
Subsub 1
Subsub 2
Section II
Subsection A
Subsection B
You are entitled to restrict access to your paper if you want to. But we all derive immense benefit from reading one another's work, and I hope you won't feel the need unless the subject matter is personal and its disclosure would be harmful or undesirable.
To restrict access to your paper simply delete the "#" character on the next two lines:
Note: TWiki has strict formatting rules for preference declarations. Make sure you preserve the three spaces, asterisk, and extra space at the beginning of these lines. If you wish to give access to any other users simply add them to the comma separated ALLOWTOPICVIEW list. |
|
|
|
|
This site is powered by the TWiki collaboration platform.
All material on this collaboration platform is the property of the contributing authors.
All material marked as authored by Eben Moglen is available under the license terms CC-BY-SA version 4.
|
|