Law in the Internet Society

View   r3  >  r2  ...
ArielBensonSecondEssay 3 - 19 Dec 2024 - Main.ArielBenson
Line: 1 to 1
 
META TOPICPARENT name="SecondEssay"

It is strongly recommended that you include your outline in the body of your essay by using the outline as section titles. The headings below are there to remind you how section and subsection titles are formatted.

Line: 23 to 23
 Clearly, the United States continues to back the domestic right to privacy, but unilaterally determined rights cannot be forced upon the rest of the world. Finding a right to privacy in the international realm requires a reimagining of jus cogens to include privacy. It seems to be doable on the surface. Arguably, the right is more orientalist than occidentalist. The American can absolutely look to expressed, legal privacy tradition, but what is the comfortability of a woman to remove a hijab in the confinements of her home without the existence of the right to privacy? The answer is nothing. The only obstacle in the way of admitting such a natural right — as it pertains to the cyberweapon conversation at hand — is the national security argument. This argument counters all state weaponry regulation. It is up to the world to decide that national security risks can be mitigated, maybe even by utilizing cyberweapons, but without the erasure of the right to privacy by overzealous states.
Changed:
<
<

Pushing for the right trade outcome.

>
>

Pushing for the right trade outcome

 

There is also the practical issue of regulating the sale and trade of cyberweapons. Export Controls in the United States look to regulate dual-use items that derive from the United States and can be used against the interests of the State. However, the list of items overseen, the Entity List, and the topics of concern have grown astronomically over the past two regimes. If Commerce or State want to have a significant and relevant impact on the cyberweapon industry, the regulators must become less centralized (see concerns on cyberweapon regulation). Cyberweapon regulation requires military and intelligence expertise, market and scholarship foresight, and predictable rule making professionals (Consider WA backlash). Thus, in an ideal world, a new State Department division would be created to oversee such export control and trade regulation.

Revision 3r3 - 19 Dec 2024 - 18:01:48 - ArielBenson
Revision 2r2 - 17 Dec 2024 - 19:19:37 - ArielBenson
This site is powered by the TWiki collaboration platform.
All material on this collaboration platform is the property of the contributing authors.
All material marked as authored by Eben Moglen is available under the license terms CC-BY-SA version 4.
Syndicate this site RSSATOM