Law in Contemporary Society

View   r4  >  r3  >  r2  >  r1
SimonYangFirstEssay 4 - 25 May 2025 - Main.SimonYang
Line: 1 to 1
 
META TOPICPARENT name="FirstEssay"

Armory and Favelas: Asking Questions

Changed:
<
<
-- By SimonYang - 24 May 2025
>
>
-- By SimonYang - 25 May 2025
 

Armory Raises Questions and Concerns

Changed:
<
<
The concept that law students might not know how or which questions to ask initially felt foreign to me. However, the deafening silence in a room full of aspiring lawyers when asked about how Armory, a chimney boy, acquired legal representation swiftly opened my eyes to this reality. Above all, I was frustratingly alarmed that I had never even thought to ask that question. If I were completely oblivious to such an obvious question, how am I supposed to ask the "important" questions as a law student? Naturally, I turn my focus to the process of how we form our questions. As such, a reflection on my decision to pursue law, built upon my previous series of questions arising from my quest for practicality, serves as an answer to this uncertainty.
>
>
The concept that law students might not know how to ask important questions initially felt foreign to me. However, the deafening silence in a room full of aspiring lawyers, when asked how Armory, a chimney boy, acquired legal representation, swiftly opened my eyes to this reality. Above all, I was frustratingly alarmed that I had never even thought to ask that question. If I were completely oblivious to such an obvious question, how was I meant to ask the "important" questions as a law student? Naturally, I turn my focus to the process of how we formulate questions. A reflection on my decision to pursue law, built upon my previous series of questions arising from my quest for practicality, answers this uncertainty.
 

Why Law? - "Theory" and "Practicality"

Changed:
<
<
The answer to why my lack of curiosity about Armory bothered me so much roots itself in my answer to the question: “Why law?” My aversion to theory and thirst for practicality helps answer this fundamental question. As an economics major in college, I realized far too quickly that the study of economics relied too heavily on theories and assumptions and did not align with the world. I thus turned to law to satisfy my need for practicality.
>
>
The answer to why my lack of curiosity about Armory bothered me so much roots itself in my answer to the question: "Why law?" My aversion to theory and thirst for practicality helps answer this fundamental question. As an economics major in college, I realized far too quickly that the study of economics relied too heavily on theories and assumptions and did not align with the world. I thus turned to law to satisfy my need for practicality.
 
Changed:
<
<
My quest for practicality over theory came from the peripheries of Rio de Janeiro: the favelas. Working at a non-profit that worked to shift the media narrative for favelas, I got to interact with community leaders from favelas, heard their stories, and appreciated the society they had proudly constructed for themselves when those of the city continued to shun their existence. This experience convinced me that the study of cultural history and the dissemination of such information to the public could eventually foster a better public understanding of the favelas.
>
>
My quest for practicality over theory came from the peripheries of Rio de Janeiro: the favelas. Working at a non-profit that worked to shift the media narrative for favelas, I interacted with community leaders from favelas, heard their stories, and appreciated the society they had proudly constructed for themselves when those of the city continued to shun their existence. This experience convinced me that the study of cultural history and the dissemination of such information could eventually foster a better public understanding of the favelas.
 
Changed:
<
<
Bolsonaro’s rise to power soon shattered my hopes. As bullets rained down from helicopters; as heavily armed vehicles began trampling on the narrow streets of favelas; as more people around me warned me to stay away from favelas – I began to question what use history and advocacy was in the face of an authoritarian man who too easily brought hell upon thousands of people.
>
>
Bolsonaro's rise to power soon shattered my hopes. As bullets rained down from helicopters; as heavily armed vehicles began trampling on the narrow streets of favelas; as more people around me warned me to stay away from favelas – I began to question what use history and advocacy were in the face of an authoritarian man who too easily brought hell upon thousands of people.
 
Changed:
<
<
My process of forming questions lay in the fundamental struggle between theory and practicality. My disillusionment with theory naturally raised questions rooted in my desire for practicality. As such, to better understand how to develop the correct questions in law school and life more broadly, I reflect upon the dynamic between theory and practicality through the lens of urban history within the scope of the favelas.
>
>
My process of forming questions lay in the fundamental struggle between theory and practicality. My disillusionment with theory naturally raised questions rooted in my desire for practicality. To better understand how to develop the correct questions in law school and life more broadly, I reflect upon the dynamic between theory and practicality through the lens of urban history within the scope of the favelas.
 

Favelas: "Practicality" in the Peripheries of "Theory"

The origins of favelas and countless other peripheral settlements reflect the tension between practicality and theory: the very dynamic I must understand to know which questions to ask.

Changed:
<
<
Brazil’s national fixation on “modernizing” their cities, as evident from moving the capital to Brasilia full of modernist architecture, to the more recent endeavors to construct modernized Olympic cities for the 2016 Olympics, has always resulted in heightened levels of adversity towards the favelas. The architecture of Brasilia, the more modern buildings of Rio tailored towards tourists, represent the nation’s ‘theory’ of what their cities should look like.
>
>
Brazil's national fixation on "modernizing" their cities, as evident from Brasilia's collection of modernist architecture and the more recent endeavors to construct modernized Olympic cities in Rio, has always resulted in heightened levels of adversity towards the favelas. The architecture of Brasilia, the more modern buildings of Rio tailored towards tourists, represent the nation's theory of what its cities should look like.
 
Changed:
<
<
Compared to the theory of the cities, the favelas represent “practicality.” This practicality is rooted in survival: those building upon the cluster of houses on the hills do not do so with a lofty theory of what the area should look like; rather, the expansion of favelas is rooted in the need for survival – the most fundamental form of practicality.
>
>
Compared to the theory of the cities, the favelas represent "practicality." This practicality is rooted in survival: those building upon the cluster of houses on the hills do not do so with a lofty theory of what the area should look like; rather, the expansion of favelas is rooted in the need for survival – the most fundamental form of practicality.
 
Changed:
<
<
Compare the Cathedral of Brasilia, a representation of what Brazil imagined their capital should look like, to Rocinha, the largest hill favela in Rio. The perfect symmetry of the cathedral, paired with its pristine uniformity of white, theorizes what the imaginative city of Brasilia was meant to represent: a nation priding itself on its modernity and order. There is no such uniformity of color or symmetry in Rocinha. Every house is painted in different hues of color. There is no calculated symmetry. The cluster of houses is highly practical – it best serves the immediate needs of those driven away by the theory of order.
>
>
Compare the Cathedral of Brasilia, a representation of what Brazil imagined their capital should look like, to Rocinha, the largest hill favela in Rio. The perfect symmetry of the cathedral, paired with its pristine uniformity of white, theorizes what the imaginative city of Brasilia was meant to represent: a nation priding itself on its modernity and order. There is no such uniformity of color or symmetry in Rocinha. Every house is painted in different hues of color. There is no calculated symmetry. The cluster of houses is highly practical as it best serves the immediate needs of those driven away by the theory of order.
 
Changed:
<
<
Yet which of the two reflects the nation’s culture more accurately? Despite the past desire for modernism and order, no one could confidently say that the cathedral better depicts Brazil’s history and identity. The favelas, as expressions of practicality, challenge the notion that calculated design equates to cultural or societal authenticity. They demonstrate that survival-driven improvisation—though unplanned and chaotic by theoretical standards—can create communities rich with identity, vibrancy, and cultural relevance.
>
>
Yet which of the two reflects the nation's culture more accurately? Despite the past desire for modernism and order, no one could confidently say that the cathedral better depicts Brazil's history and identity. The favelas, as expressions of practicality, challenge the notion that calculated design equates to cultural or societal authenticity. They demonstrate that survival-driven improvisation, though unplanned and chaotic by theoretical standards, can create communities rich with identity, vibrancy, and cultural relevance.
 As such, practicality, especially the kind that arises as the result of marginalization by theory, represents an unfiltered reality shaped by necessity, resilience, and adaptation. While theory aspires to construct idealized visions of order, practicality often emerges from the lived experiences of those excluded from such visions. It is within this tension that questions of priority and value arise.

From the Favelas to Law School

Changed:
<
<
This tension between practicality and theory mirrors my own internal struggle as I navigate law school. The theoretical framework of law—the carefully architected doctrines and principles—offers an order that can feel disconnected from the complexities of real-world challenges. The chaotic yet deeply human practicality of the favelas reflects the lived realities that laws aim, but sometimes fail, to address.
>
>
This tension between practicality and theory mirrors my internal struggle as I navigate law school. The theoretical framework of law – the carefully architected doctrines and principles – offers an order that can feel disconnected from the complexities of real-world challenges. The chaotic yet deeply human practicality of the favelas reflects the lived realities that laws aim, but sometimes fail, to address.
 
Changed:
<
<
As I continue my journey through law school, I aim to bridge this divide. I need to approach classes and cases not just as exercises in mastering theoretical constructs but as opportunities to uncover the practical implications of those constructs. The question is not merely "What does the law say?" but "Whose reality does the law serve, and whose does it ignore?" It is through grappling with this dynamic—of theory and practicality—that I hope to develop the ability to ask the right questions.
>
>
As I continue my journey through law school, I need to approach classes and cases not just as exercises in mastering theory but as opportunities to uncover the practical implications of those constructs. The question is not merely "What does the law say?" but "Whose reality does the law serve, and whose does it ignore?" It is through grappling with this dynamic between theory and practicality that I hope to develop the ability to ask the right questions.
 
You are entitled to restrict access to your paper if you want to. But we all derive immense benefit from reading one another's work, and I hope you won't feel the need unless the subject matter is personal and its disclosure would be harmful or undesirable.

SimonYangFirstEssay 3 - 24 May 2025 - Main.SimonYang
Line: 1 to 1
 
META TOPICPARENT name="FirstEssay"

Armory and Favelas: Asking Questions

Changed:
<
<
-- By SimonYang - 20 Feb 2025
>
>
-- By SimonYang - 24 May 2025
 

Armory Raises Questions and Concerns

Changed:
<
<
The concept that law students might not know how or which questions to ask initially felt foreign to me. However, the deafening silence in a room full of aspiring lawyers when asked about how Armory, a chimney boy, acquired legal representation swiftly opened my eyes to this reality. Above all, I was frustratingly alarmed that I had never even thought to ask that question. If I was completely oblivious to such an obvious question, how am I supposed to ask the "important" questions as a law student? Can I undergo a metamorphosis during these three years to evolve and learn which questions to ask?
>
>
The concept that law students might not know how or which questions to ask initially felt foreign to me. However, the deafening silence in a room full of aspiring lawyers when asked about how Armory, a chimney boy, acquired legal representation swiftly opened my eyes to this reality. Above all, I was frustratingly alarmed that I had never even thought to ask that question. If I were completely oblivious to such an obvious question, how am I supposed to ask the "important" questions as a law student? Naturally, I turn my focus to the process of how we form our questions. As such, a reflection on my decision to pursue law, built upon my previous series of questions arising from my quest for practicality, serves as an answer to this uncertainty.
 
Changed:
<
<

Back to the Fundamentals – Why Law?

>
>

Why Law? - "Theory" and "Practicality"

 
Changed:
<
<
I reflected on why my lack of curiosity about Armory bothered me so much. To answer this, I had to revisit my painstakingly naive response to the question that every law student faces from the moment they consider a career in law: why law? I simply wanted to learn about a subject that is highly practical, applicable to everyone's lives, and one that I can use to effect tangible change and impact in my immediate communities. If my fundamental curiosity for law was rooted in my quest to study something practical, how was it that I had never once stopped to question how this chimney boy found his way into a courtroom?
>
>
The answer to why my lack of curiosity about Armory bothered me so much roots itself in my answer to the question: “Why law?” My aversion to theory and thirst for practicality helps answer this fundamental question. As an economics major in college, I realized far too quickly that the study of economics relied too heavily on theories and assumptions and did not align with the world. I thus turned to law to satisfy my need for practicality.
 
Changed:
<
<
Perhaps the claustrophobic and hectic environment of 1L year deafened me to the "important" questions deeply buried within me. The immediate need to focus on rules and holdings to arm myself against numerous fact patterns and policy questions may not permit me to even conjure such inquiries. But even without these pressures, I am scared that, even in an environment devoid of such adversities, I would still not be able to develop the skill to ask the right questions.
>
>
My quest for practicality over theory came from the peripheries of Rio de Janeiro: the favelas. Working at a non-profit that worked to shift the media narrative for favelas, I got to interact with community leaders from favelas, heard their stories, and appreciated the society they had proudly constructed for themselves when those of the city continued to shun their existence. This experience convinced me that the study of cultural history and the dissemination of such information to the public could eventually foster a better public understanding of the favelas.
 
Changed:
<
<
In college, I majored in economics because of the same fixation on learning something practical and applicable. I naively thought that understanding economics would provide the level of practicality I craved. Yet, I realized far too quickly that my economics classes relied heavily on assumptions that did not align with the real world. I then turned to law with the same naive hopes. But now, as the curious case of Armory still haunts me, I fear that my initial answer to "why law" is getting lost amidst the waves of exams and networking events.
>
>
Bolsonaro’s rise to power soon shattered my hopes. As bullets rained down from helicopters; as heavily armed vehicles began trampling on the narrow streets of favelas; as more people around me warned me to stay away from favelas – I began to question what use history and advocacy was in the face of an authoritarian man who too easily brought hell upon thousands of people.
 
Changed:
<
<

Favelas and the Need for Practicality

>
>
My process of forming questions lay in the fundamental struggle between theory and practicality. My disillusionment with theory naturally raised questions rooted in my desire for practicality. As such, to better understand how to develop the correct questions in law school and life more broadly, I reflect upon the dynamic between theory and practicality through the lens of urban history within the scope of the favelas.
 
Changed:
<
<
To explain and possibly overcome this fear, I thought it might be necessary to first understand the origins of my fixation on practicality. Before economics and law, my interest lay in linguistic studies coupled with history. My Spanish studies quickly led me to inquire more about Latin American history, which then piqued my interest in Brazilian history. Naturally, I pursued Portuguese, and to expedite the process, I traveled to Rio de Janeiro. The first thing I noticed in Rio was not the weather, the beaches, or the mountains, but the colorful array of houses clustered around the hills surrounding the city. Despite my fascination with the favelas, my friends in Rio quickly advised me to stay away from them. They warned me that these favelas were infested with criminal activities, drug trafficking, and consequent police raids.
>
>

Favelas: "Practicality" in the Peripheries of "Theory"

 
Changed:
<
<
I soon found myself researching the history of favelas, their origins in failed governmental promises of housing to Afro-Brazilians who served in the Canudos War, their ongoing battle against a national fixation on urban modernization, the irony of the nation drawing from their cultures all the while enforcing an invisible border between the favelas and the city. Working at a non-profit that worked to shift the media narrative for favelas, I got to interact with community leaders from favelas, heard their stories, and appreciated the society they had proudly constructed for themselves when those of the city continued to shun their existence. I further convinced myself that the study of cultural history and the dissemination of such information to the public could eventually foster a better public understanding of the favelas.
>
>
The origins of favelas and countless other peripheral settlements reflect the tension between practicality and theory: the very dynamic I must understand to know which questions to ask.
 
Changed:
<
<
Bolsonaro’s rise to power soon shattered my hopes. As bullets rained down from helicopters; as heavily armed vehicles began trampling on the narrow streets of favelas; as more people around me warned me to stay away from favelas – I began to question what use history and advocacy was in the face of an authoritarian man who too easily brought hell upon thousands of people.
>
>
Brazil’s national fixation on “modernizing” their cities, as evident from moving the capital to Brasilia full of modernist architecture, to the more recent endeavors to construct modernized Olympic cities for the 2016 Olympics, has always resulted in heightened levels of adversity towards the favelas. The architecture of Brasilia, the more modern buildings of Rio tailored towards tourists, represent the nation’s ‘theory’ of what their cities should look like.

Compared to the theory of the cities, the favelas represent “practicality.” This practicality is rooted in survival: those building upon the cluster of houses on the hills do not do so with a lofty theory of what the area should look like; rather, the expansion of favelas is rooted in the need for survival – the most fundamental form of practicality.

Compare the Cathedral of Brasilia, a representation of what Brazil imagined their capital should look like, to Rocinha, the largest hill favela in Rio. The perfect symmetry of the cathedral, paired with its pristine uniformity of white, theorizes what the imaginative city of Brasilia was meant to represent: a nation priding itself on its modernity and order. There is no such uniformity of color or symmetry in Rocinha. Every house is painted in different hues of color. There is no calculated symmetry. The cluster of houses is highly practical – it best serves the immediate needs of those driven away by the theory of order.

 
Changed:
<
<
Perhaps deep down, this experience planted in me the seeds of craving something practical. Something that could not be dismantled so easily. Economics did not end up satisfying that for me. I now face the question of whether the law can. What scares me, however, is that this question that is so fundamental to what I seek out of my law school experience – had remained forgotten since the beginning of 1L year. Had it not been for the curious case of Armory, I am afraid this fundamental question of mine – “Why law?” – may not have truly surfaced again.
>
>
Yet which of the two reflects the nation’s culture more accurately? Despite the past desire for modernism and order, no one could confidently say that the cathedral better depicts Brazil’s history and identity. The favelas, as expressions of practicality, challenge the notion that calculated design equates to cultural or societal authenticity. They demonstrate that survival-driven improvisation—though unplanned and chaotic by theoretical standards—can create communities rich with identity, vibrancy, and cultural relevance.
 
Changed:
<
<

Questions Onwards

>
>
As such, practicality, especially the kind that arises as the result of marginalization by theory, represents an unfiltered reality shaped by necessity, resilience, and adaptation. While theory aspires to construct idealized visions of order, practicality often emerges from the lived experiences of those excluded from such visions. It is within this tension that questions of priority and value arise.
 
Changed:
<
<
The question for me now then is: how do I navigate my law school experience and achieve the metamorphosis that will help me answer my question of practicality in an educational system inevitably designed for me to gloss over this objective? How must I approach my classes differently to know which questions to ask about this metamorphosis I seek? With the question of Armory still looming over me, I do not yet have an answer to all these questions. While I still fear that may never be able to know how to ask the right questions, I now know to always revisit my initial answer to why law – and to constantly think about law as I initially imagined it: a force in everyone’s daily lives not fenced-in and simplified by the rules and fact patterns.
>
>

From the Favelas to Law School

 
Changed:
<
<
The essay is about uncertainty, which it discusses in an uncertain structure. Clearer focus and sequence would help. A moment of doubt about what questions to ask should concentrate attention on the process by which we form our questions. Your past experience shows you the perils of accepting others' questions as one's own. It also shows how new questions are asked, but it leaves that knowledge implicit.
>
>
This tension between practicality and theory mirrors my own internal struggle as I navigate law school. The theoretical framework of law—the carefully architected doctrines and principles—offers an order that can feel disconnected from the complexities of real-world challenges. The chaotic yet deeply human practicality of the favelas reflects the lived realities that laws aim, but sometimes fail, to address.
 
Changed:
<
<
Cities are works of imagination. At the outer edge of all of them, since Mesapotamia at least if not almost all the way back to the end of the Ice Age, are the "provisional" zones, where the imagined structures of order give way to the improvisations of those whose presence in the ecology is more recent, more adventitious, less "authorized" or architected, than what has preceded them. Further reflection on "practicality" as opposed to "theory" in relation to the history of the city, any city, might be fruitful for you.
>
>
As I continue my journey through law school, I aim to bridge this divide. I need to approach classes and cases not just as exercises in mastering theoretical constructs but as opportunities to uncover the practical implications of those constructs. The question is not merely "What does the law say?" but "Whose reality does the law serve, and whose does it ignore?" It is through grappling with this dynamic—of theory and practicality—that I hope to develop the ability to ask the right questions.
 
You are entitled to restrict access to your paper if you want to. But we all derive immense benefit from reading one another's work, and I hope you won't feel the need unless the subject matter is personal and its disclosure would be harmful or undesirable.

SimonYangFirstEssay 2 - 26 Apr 2025 - Main.EbenMoglen
Line: 1 to 1
 
META TOPICPARENT name="FirstEssay"
Deleted:
<
<
It is strongly recommended that you include your outline in the body of your essay by using the outline as section titles. The headings below are there to remind you how section and subsection titles are formatted.
 

Armory and Favelas: Asking Questions

Line: 34 to 33
 The question for me now then is: how do I navigate my law school experience and achieve the metamorphosis that will help me answer my question of practicality in an educational system inevitably designed for me to gloss over this objective? How must I approach my classes differently to know which questions to ask about this metamorphosis I seek? With the question of Armory still looming over me, I do not yet have an answer to all these questions. While I still fear that may never be able to know how to ask the right questions, I now know to always revisit my initial answer to why law – and to constantly think about law as I initially imagined it: a force in everyone’s daily lives not fenced-in and simplified by the rules and fact patterns.
Added:
>
>
The essay is about uncertainty, which it discusses in an uncertain structure. Clearer focus and sequence would help. A moment of doubt about what questions to ask should concentrate attention on the process by which we form our questions. Your past experience shows you the perils of accepting others' questions as one's own. It also shows how new questions are asked, but it leaves that knowledge implicit.

Cities are works of imagination. At the outer edge of all of them, since Mesapotamia at least if not almost all the way back to the end of the Ice Age, are the "provisional" zones, where the imagined structures of order give way to the improvisations of those whose presence in the ecology is more recent, more adventitious, less "authorized" or architected, than what has preceded them. Further reflection on "practicality" as opposed to "theory" in relation to the history of the city, any city, might be fruitful for you.

 
You are entitled to restrict access to your paper if you want to. But we all derive immense benefit from reading one another's work, and I hope you won't feel the need unless the subject matter is personal and its disclosure would be harmful or undesirable. To restrict access to your paper simply delete the "#" character on the next two lines:

SimonYangFirstEssay 1 - 20 Feb 2025 - Main.SimonYang
Line: 1 to 1
Added:
>
>
META TOPICPARENT name="FirstEssay"
It is strongly recommended that you include your outline in the body of your essay by using the outline as section titles. The headings below are there to remind you how section and subsection titles are formatted.

Armory and Favelas: Asking Questions

-- By SimonYang - 20 Feb 2025

Armory Raises Questions and Concerns

The concept that law students might not know how or which questions to ask initially felt foreign to me. However, the deafening silence in a room full of aspiring lawyers when asked about how Armory, a chimney boy, acquired legal representation swiftly opened my eyes to this reality. Above all, I was frustratingly alarmed that I had never even thought to ask that question. If I was completely oblivious to such an obvious question, how am I supposed to ask the "important" questions as a law student? Can I undergo a metamorphosis during these three years to evolve and learn which questions to ask?

Back to the Fundamentals – Why Law?

I reflected on why my lack of curiosity about Armory bothered me so much. To answer this, I had to revisit my painstakingly naive response to the question that every law student faces from the moment they consider a career in law: why law? I simply wanted to learn about a subject that is highly practical, applicable to everyone's lives, and one that I can use to effect tangible change and impact in my immediate communities. If my fundamental curiosity for law was rooted in my quest to study something practical, how was it that I had never once stopped to question how this chimney boy found his way into a courtroom?

Perhaps the claustrophobic and hectic environment of 1L year deafened me to the "important" questions deeply buried within me. The immediate need to focus on rules and holdings to arm myself against numerous fact patterns and policy questions may not permit me to even conjure such inquiries. But even without these pressures, I am scared that, even in an environment devoid of such adversities, I would still not be able to develop the skill to ask the right questions.

In college, I majored in economics because of the same fixation on learning something practical and applicable. I naively thought that understanding economics would provide the level of practicality I craved. Yet, I realized far too quickly that my economics classes relied heavily on assumptions that did not align with the real world. I then turned to law with the same naive hopes. But now, as the curious case of Armory still haunts me, I fear that my initial answer to "why law" is getting lost amidst the waves of exams and networking events.

Favelas and the Need for Practicality

To explain and possibly overcome this fear, I thought it might be necessary to first understand the origins of my fixation on practicality. Before economics and law, my interest lay in linguistic studies coupled with history. My Spanish studies quickly led me to inquire more about Latin American history, which then piqued my interest in Brazilian history. Naturally, I pursued Portuguese, and to expedite the process, I traveled to Rio de Janeiro. The first thing I noticed in Rio was not the weather, the beaches, or the mountains, but the colorful array of houses clustered around the hills surrounding the city. Despite my fascination with the favelas, my friends in Rio quickly advised me to stay away from them. They warned me that these favelas were infested with criminal activities, drug trafficking, and consequent police raids.

I soon found myself researching the history of favelas, their origins in failed governmental promises of housing to Afro-Brazilians who served in the Canudos War, their ongoing battle against a national fixation on urban modernization, the irony of the nation drawing from their cultures all the while enforcing an invisible border between the favelas and the city. Working at a non-profit that worked to shift the media narrative for favelas, I got to interact with community leaders from favelas, heard their stories, and appreciated the society they had proudly constructed for themselves when those of the city continued to shun their existence. I further convinced myself that the study of cultural history and the dissemination of such information to the public could eventually foster a better public understanding of the favelas.

Bolsonaro’s rise to power soon shattered my hopes. As bullets rained down from helicopters; as heavily armed vehicles began trampling on the narrow streets of favelas; as more people around me warned me to stay away from favelas – I began to question what use history and advocacy was in the face of an authoritarian man who too easily brought hell upon thousands of people.

Perhaps deep down, this experience planted in me the seeds of craving something practical. Something that could not be dismantled so easily. Economics did not end up satisfying that for me. I now face the question of whether the law can. What scares me, however, is that this question that is so fundamental to what I seek out of my law school experience – had remained forgotten since the beginning of 1L year. Had it not been for the curious case of Armory, I am afraid this fundamental question of mine – “Why law?” – may not have truly surfaced again.

Questions Onwards

The question for me now then is: how do I navigate my law school experience and achieve the metamorphosis that will help me answer my question of practicality in an educational system inevitably designed for me to gloss over this objective? How must I approach my classes differently to know which questions to ask about this metamorphosis I seek? With the question of Armory still looming over me, I do not yet have an answer to all these questions. While I still fear that may never be able to know how to ask the right questions, I now know to always revisit my initial answer to why law – and to constantly think about law as I initially imagined it: a force in everyone’s daily lives not fenced-in and simplified by the rules and fact patterns.


You are entitled to restrict access to your paper if you want to. But we all derive immense benefit from reading one another's work, and I hope you won't feel the need unless the subject matter is personal and its disclosure would be harmful or undesirable. To restrict access to your paper simply delete the "#" character on the next two lines:

Note: TWiki has strict formatting rules for preference declarations. Make sure you preserve the three spaces, asterisk, and extra space at the beginning of these lines. If you wish to give access to any other users simply add them to the comma separated ALLOWTOPICVIEW list.


Revision 4r4 - 25 May 2025 - 05:41:01 - SimonYang
Revision 3r3 - 24 May 2025 - 16:43:48 - SimonYang
Revision 2r2 - 26 Apr 2025 - 14:07:23 - EbenMoglen
Revision 1r1 - 20 Feb 2025 - 17:58:05 - SimonYang
This site is powered by the TWiki collaboration platform.
All material on this collaboration platform is the property of the contributing authors.
All material marked as authored by Eben Moglen is available under the license terms CC-BY-SA version 4.
Syndicate this site RSSATOM