Law in Contemporary Society

View   r4  >  r3  >  r2  >  r1
ShidehZokaiyFirstEssay 4 - 27 May 2025 - Main.ShidehZokaiy
Line: 1 to 1
 
META TOPICPARENT name="FirstEssay"
Line: 9 to 9
 

Lately, everything feels unbearably loud.

Changed:
<
<
In my apartment, I hear the water droplets falling from my faulty faucet onto the kitchen sink. During class, I hear the breathy sighs people take before speaking into microphones. I can listen to my peers glance over when I react to a professor’s jokes, almost as if I’ve lost my mind! I stand surrounded by them and separated by invisible glass.
>
>
In my apartment, I hear the water droplets falling from my faulty faucet onto the kitchen sink. During class, I catch the breathy sighs my peers take before speaking into microphones. I can hear them glance over when I react to a professor’s jokes as if I’ve lost my mind. I stand surrounded, yet separated by invisible glass.
 
Changed:
<
<
Again, I am the immigrant. My peers and educated parents understand the system. LLMs decode complex statutes intuitively. I’m still looking up words I don’t fully grasp. “It’s inefficient,” my professors remind me. How will I ever catch up, and at what cost?
>
>
Again, I am the immigrant. My peers with educated parents understand the system. LLMs decode complex statutes intuitively. I’m still looking up words I haven't fully grasped. “It’s inefficient,” my professors remind me. How will I ever catch up, and at what cost?
 
Changed:
<
<
Professor Moglen says I’m the only student in my law school. I say cue Simon & Garfunkel, because I might as well be the Only Living Girl in New York. Alas, I fear I await becoming the only lawyer in the profession, isolated by selfish motives, status-seeking, and feeble insecurities. Alone again, looking for some connection that always seems just beyond reach.
>
>
Picture this: I’m walking home after a thirteen-hour workday topped with two hours of networking. Just as I’m thanking God that I can finally shut my brain off, the guy next to me starts blasting Gilbert O’Sullivan’s Alone Again from his speakers. Professor Moglen says I’m the only student in my law school. I say cue Simon & Garfunkel because I might as well be the Only Living Girl in New York. Alas, I fear that I await becoming the only lawyer in the profession!
 
Changed:
<
<
The city bustles with dreamers oblivious to the unhoused drifting among them. Academic elites pledge to “stand with the people,” but their gestures rarely extend beyond theory or self-congratulation. Perhaps it’s always been this loud. My migraines are less amplified by the noise and more by my awareness of it. Perhaps, in Tehran, the corruption and gore were simply more blatant.
>
>
Maybe I can blame New York. The city never sleeps, so I feel guilty if I do. The dreamers keep going, counting on stimulants and alcohol on The Path to Partnership, ignoring that the unhoused who walk beside on the streets once believed themselves invincible too. Perhaps my migraines are less amplified by the noise and more by my awareness of it: law, corruption, and pressure to find an ethical career.
 
Changed:
<
<
Justice Holmes and the legal realists said that law was the condition under which public force is applied in courts, but what of those who sidestep law through power and connections? If judges are moral paragons, why does our Supreme Court include a man accused of rape, photographed wearing blackface? How am I to confidently tackle policy within a system tethered to arbitrary interpretations? Shall I bet on my superior’s intentions, risk unpopular stances, or play it safe? How can I trust Leaders of the Free World when my point of reference remains the oppression I fled?
>
>
Justice Holmes and the legal realists said that law is the condition under which public force is applied. But what of those who sidestep it through power? If judges are moral paragons, how come we have a sitting Supreme Court Justice accused of rape and photographed while wearing blackface? How am I to confidently tackle policy within a system tethered to arbitrary interpretations? Shall I bet on my superior’s intentions, risk unpopular stances, or play it safe? How can I trust Leaders of the Free World when my point of reference remains the oppression I fled?
 

Pick your poison.

Changed:
<
<
When I was eight years old, I was nearly taken from my parents for practicing ballet, deemed sexually provocative and thus illegal in Iran. I barely comprehended the situation, but I sensed my parents’ fear, almost as much as I sensed their relief once we escaped. My parents and I arrived in America 14 years ago with our lives packed into four suitcases. We stayed in my aunt’s guest room until we could afford a one-bedroom apartment. My parents slept on mattresses in the living room while I kept the bedroom. Compared to Tehran, life felt lavish. Unable to afford a tutor, I lugged our Farsi-English dictionary to the library every day, looking up every word I didn’t know. As I learned more English, I began to understand the world around me. Like when my neighbors called the police, accusing us of speaking our “terrorist language” too loudly, and when their kids chased me around the courtyard, yelling, “You hairy, smelly, big-nosed monkeys are taking over!” Oh, to be an Iranian-American post-9/11.
>
>
When I was eight years old, I was nearly taken from my parents for practicing ballet, deemed sexually provocative and thus illegal in Iran. I barely comprehended the situation, but I sensed my parents' fear, almost as much as I sensed their relief once we escaped.
 
Changed:
<
<
Despite risks to my family’s safety, I interned at an Israeli-Jewish lobbying firm after college. There, I saw renowned human rights leaders toast to closing backchannel oil deals that funded the Mullas’ extravagant lifestyles. Even the UN appointed Iranian officials to oversee the women’s rights commission despite global condemnation. After Western media reported on the Iranian regime poisoning its schoolgirls, Psychology Today published a study on the 'mass hysteria of Iranian school girls,' despite footage showing the girls being carried away on stretchers, struggling to breathe due to inhaling toxins. By the time links between Iranian elites and Psychology Today’s academics surfaced, the world had moved on. But Iranians persisted. My brothers continued receiving beatings for practicing other religions openly. My sisters cut their hair in solidarity with imprisoned protesters and endured punitive lashings for their defiance.
>
>
My parents and I arrived in America 14 years ago with our lives packed into four suitcases. We lived in my aunt’s guest room until we could afford a one-bedroom apartment. My parents slept on mattresses in the living room while I kept the bedroom. Compared to Tehran, life felt lavish. Unable to afford a tutor, I lugged our Farsi-English dictionary to the library every day, looking up every unfamiliar word. As I learned more English, I began to understand the world around me, like when neighbors called the police because we were speaking our "terrorist language" too loudly. Oh, to be an Iranian-American post-9/11.

Still, I kept going, hoping that if I could understand the system, maybe I could fix it. So, despite risks to my family’s safety, I interned at an Israeli-Jewish lobbying firm after college. There, I witnessed renowned human rights leaders toast to closing backchannel oil deals that funded the Mullas' extravagant lifestyles. When the regime poisoned Iranian schoolgirls, Psychology Today published a study on the "mass hysteria of Iranian school girls.” Never mind the terror these girls realized when they had to choose between removing their headscarves to cover their mouths and risking execution by the regime or succumbing to poison right there. Never mind leaked evidence linking Psychology Today’s respected academics to the Iranian elites who orchestrated the attacks. The world moved on, as signaled by the United Nations when they appointed Iranian officials to the Women’s Rights Commission soon after the attacks.

 Oil. Our Great Leaders combine oil with blood money to fund their diverse luxury clothing collections!
Line: 34 to 35
 

If it were up to them, I’d take poison and die.

This past year, I almost forgot that my mind is the greatest weapon in my arsenal–a weapon powerful enough to threaten even a Theocratic Dictatorship.

Changed:
<
<
I’m afraid of losing myself to cynicism and becoming another clichéd suit whose thrills are oral arguments or clicking buttons to seal a deal. I still cringe when Big Law asks if I would be interested in leading their “international oil deals”. Now, what’s a charming way of getting out of that one, without being a Debbie Downer?
>
>
I fear cynicism will swallow me whole, and I will become another clichéd suit thriving on oral arguments or sealing deals. I cringe when interviewers ask if I am interested in leading their “international oil deals.” Now, what’s a charming way of getting out of that one without being a Debbie Downer?
 I dread accepting the notion that life is reduced to Kafkaesque meaninglessness, punctuated by superficial victories and silent despair. I worry I must walk in isolation, forever searching for something elusive. I worry about making the wrong choice and inhaling the poison. Then what becomes of all this turmoil? My parents protected me, and now it’s my turn to protect them. But what if I can’t? What if I fail?

In acknowledging my wandering mind, I become conscious of the cycle.

Changed:
<
<
I grapple with concepts of liberty and freedom, corruption and governance, and fairness and equality. I aspire to help my family, to become the first woman in my lineage to attain a higher education degree, and to enact substantial progress in law. Maybe my mind is unruly; perhaps I don’t intuitively grasp codes as peers may. Yet here I am, learning and trying, even when I feel terrified to be doing it alone.
>
>
I grapple with concepts of liberty and freedom, corruption and governance, and fairness and equality. I aspire to help my family, to become the first woman in my lineage to attain a higher education degree, and to enact substantial progress in law. I stand, learning and trying, with my unruly mind, even when I am terrified to be doing it alone.
 And that’s the thing: when you realize you’re caught in the cycle, the awareness itself is a break from the automatic. Being here, grappling with it, and writing about it are my forms of protest, my dance against the forces that say my mind is too dangerous.

ShidehZokaiyFirstEssay 3 - 19 May 2025 - Main.ShidehZokaiy
Line: 1 to 1
 
META TOPICPARENT name="FirstEssay"
Changed:
<
<

What is the law, anyway, and who is making it?

>
>

Oil, Poison, and Other Remedies: Notes from the Only Living Girl

 
Changed:
<
<
-- By ShidehZokaiy - 19 Feb 2025
>
>
-- By ShidehZokaiy - 18 May 2025
 
Changed:
<
<
Growing up, I thought law meant justice—the gold standard of civil behavior, peace, and freedom. If everyone followed “the law,” we would all be sitting around the fire, singing kumbaya, and things like crimes against humanity, tax evasion, presidential conspiracies defrauding The People, and jaywalking would be a thing of the past.
>
>

Lately, everything feels unbearably loud.

 
Changed:
<
<
My parents and I came to America 14 years ago with just four suitcases. We stayed in my aunt’s guest room until my parents worked enough odd jobs to afford an apartment. My parents slept on mattresses in the living room while I kept the bedroom. Compared to Tehran, where a stick of gum cost five dollars, I lived lavishly. I wore optional uniforms to school to save on clothes. We didn’t have enough money for a tutor, so I lugged our Farsi-English dictionary to the library every day and looked up every foreign word to learn English. I wish I didn’t know any English though when my White neighbors called the police because we were speaking our, "Terrorist language too loudly,” or when his sons chased me across the courtyard, yelling, “You hairy, smelly, big-nosed monkeys are taking over!”
>
>
In my apartment, I hear the water droplets falling from my faulty faucet onto the kitchen sink. During class, I hear the breathy sighs people take before speaking into microphones. I can listen to my peers glance over when I react to a professor’s jokes, almost as if I’ve lost my mind! I stand surrounded by them and separated by invisible glass.
 
Changed:
<
<
I still wish I couldn’t understand English when I hear First World leaders spew hate speech or preach discriminatory laws. I think of seeing my brothers in Iran beat to a pulp because they practiced a different religion or rubbing oil on my sisters’ scars from slashes received for failing to cover their hair. I was almost taken from my parents because I did ballet, which was deemed sexually provocative and therefore illegal in Iran. I was 8.
>
>
Again, I am the immigrant. My peers and educated parents understand the system. LLMs decode complex statutes intuitively. I’m still looking up words I don’t fully grasp. “It’s inefficient,” my professors remind me. How will I ever catch up, and at what cost?
 
Changed:
<
<
Surely, America is different. We get rights. We get freedom. We get choice. We get a voice and we get democracy! Iran’s leaders fatten on blood money and send their kids abroad for education, while the majority of domestic youth become dropouts hooked on drugs by 15. They are hypocrites who preach Sharia law but rape and murder women and children. America has it figured out!
>
>
Professor Moglen says I’m the only student in my law school. I say cue Simon & Garfunkel, because I might as well be the Only Living Girl in New York. Alas, I fear I await becoming the only lawyer in the profession, isolated by selfish motives, status-seeking, and feeble insecurities. Alone again, looking for some connection that always seems just beyond reach.
 
Changed:
<
<
Oliver Wendell Holmes said law was the conditions under which public force is applied in courts—what about those who sidestep the law through connections? Legal realists argue that law derives from prevailing social interests and public policy, not purely formalistic legal considerations. So how can judges craft rules against established public good notions—like bodily autonomy? If judges are paragons of morality, why does our Supreme Court include a man accused of rape and photographed while wearing black face?
>
>
The city bustles with dreamers oblivious to the unhoused drifting among them. Academic elites pledge to “stand with the people,” but their gestures rarely extend beyond theory or self-congratulation. Perhaps it’s always been this loud. My migraines are less amplified by the noise and more by my awareness of it. Perhaps, in Tehran, the corruption and gore were simply more blatant.
 
Changed:
<
<
I interned at a global lobbying firm after college. During negotiations, I observed renowned human rights activists involved in lucrative backchannel oil agreements that fueled Mullas’ extravagant lifestyles and helped them divert attention from their cruelty. Even the UN appeared compromised after appointing Iranian officials to women’s rights commissions. I kept going, hoping law school would help me find tangible solutions.
>
>
Justice Holmes and the legal realists said that law was the condition under which public force is applied in courts, but what of those who sidestep law through power and connections? If judges are moral paragons, why does our Supreme Court include a man accused of rape, photographed wearing blackface? How am I to confidently tackle policy within a system tethered to arbitrary interpretations? Shall I bet on my superior’s intentions, risk unpopular stances, or play it safe? How can I trust Leaders of the Free World when my point of reference remains the oppression I fled?
 
Deleted:
<
<
I now feel like an immigrant again. My peers with educated parents understand the system. LLMs make sense of codes. I don’t have time to look up words I don’t know. “It’s inefficient,” say professors and peers. How will I catch up, and what will I sacrifice along the way?
 
Changed:
<
<
Now more than ever, American youth are disillusioned by the government. Their anxiety about health or careers are understandable with such an inconsistent system. How do judges make decisions? Shall we examine their clerks, clerks’ professors, or the legal institutions that define law and justice. Is it about the law on the books—if so, which text? Bible or Constitution? Originalist, historical, precedential, or structural lens? How much do politics and self-interests influence rulings?
>
>

Pick your poison.

 
Changed:
<
<
Don’t waste time, you are in a capitalist society that demands you make money. An Ivy League law education opens doors, yet how can students serve the public when they're forced to see nothing but the law in heterogeneous terms and shun corporate greed that could free them from debt? How much does my voice/vote matter anyway?
>
>
When I was eight years old, I was nearly taken from my parents for practicing ballet, deemed sexually provocative and thus illegal in Iran. I barely comprehended the situation, but I sensed my parents’ fear, almost as much as I sensed their relief once we escaped. My parents and I arrived in America 14 years ago with our lives packed into four suitcases. We stayed in my aunt’s guest room until we could afford a one-bedroom apartment. My parents slept on mattresses in the living room while I kept the bedroom. Compared to Tehran, life felt lavish. Unable to afford a tutor, I lugged our Farsi-English dictionary to the library every day, looking up every word I didn’t know. As I learned more English, I began to understand the world around me. Like when my neighbors called the police, accusing us of speaking our “terrorist language” too loudly, and when their kids chased me around the courtyard, yelling, “You hairy, smelly, big-nosed monkeys are taking over!” Oh, to be an Iranian-American post-9/11.
 
Changed:
<
<
I can count the number of times I’ve seen people laugh in my classes. Peers look at me like I’ve lost my mind if I react to a professor’s jokes. Only way to refrain from questioning my own sanity has been [soft]self-isolation. Musn’t… give… in…. to the comparison game. Ah, the Big Apple, waiting for me to take a bite!
>
>
Despite risks to my family’s safety, I interned at an Israeli-Jewish lobbying firm after college. There, I saw renowned human rights leaders toast to closing backchannel oil deals that funded the Mullas’ extravagant lifestyles. Even the UN appointed Iranian officials to oversee the women’s rights commission despite global condemnation. After Western media reported on the Iranian regime poisoning its schoolgirls, Psychology Today published a study on the 'mass hysteria of Iranian school girls,' despite footage showing the girls being carried away on stretchers, struggling to breathe due to inhaling toxins. By the time links between Iranian elites and Psychology Today’s academics surfaced, the world had moved on. But Iranians persisted. My brothers continued receiving beatings for practicing other religions openly. My sisters cut their hair in solidarity with imprisoned protesters and endured punitive lashings for their defiance.
 
Changed:
<
<
You’re not here to laugh or question the institution. Live in the moment by identifying the cases and theories your professor emphasizes—distractions spark too many ideas. Noses in the books, heads in the sand. Unironic ostrich defense. Everyone knows everyone in this industry. You won’t go far by scrutinizing our great leaders!
>
>
Oil. Our Great Leaders combine oil with blood money to fund their diverse luxury clothing collections!
 
Changed:
<
<
You'll understand “law” eventually—if not, fake it on LinkedIn? ? with a fancy firm or prestigious clerkship. Work for big oil to save for your eco-friendly practice, or become a retired partner who escapes to the Swiss Alps to ‘reconnect with nature.’ Forget values, faith, family, or friendship. Work New York big law; once you get hitched and the ol’ ball n’ chain can’t take it anymore, move to the Californian suburbs to raise a family (where you might cheat with your “secretary” and start surfing to prove that you didn’t waste your physical pique on blow and all-nighters). This is the life you chose! You're too old. Too busy. Too late. Everything’s meaningless but Kafka's writings. You’re a clichéd Suit whose thrills are oral arguments or clicking buttons to seal a deal. Should you kill yourself or just have a cup of coffee? And is it better to be or not to be? Why didn’t you just suck it up and become a STEM major so you could’ve practiced patent law instead? If I just made more, I would have been done already! Now, I need to do this. How could I ever feel so rich when I was on food stamps at 10? No matter. I must work. No time 4 counterfactuals—maybe for the best.
>
>
Oil. When government-controlled pharmaceuticals turn teenagers into wandering addicts and when insurance is a laughable concept, you dull the pain or fade the scars by rubbing oil into wounds.
 
Changed:
<
<
This is a draft about escape. It escapes itself, as you can see in rereading, losing coherence as it gains momentum, breaking through the limits of narrative in a connection with its own passion. Improvement is in that sense an ironic concept: it means reasserting control and thus, in a sense, undermining the rush of freedom.
>
>

If it were up to them, I’d take poison and die.

 
Changed:
<
<
The outline is not a prison, but it is a restraint. We need to isolate the central idea, state it clearly at the outset, show where we derived it and how we develop it, and give the reader some conclusion on the basis of which she can take it further for herself. That discipline will cost some of the intensity that animates this draft, probably, but it will compensate for that loss by making it possible for the reader to think with rather than only about you.
>
>
This past year, I almost forgot that my mind is the greatest weapon in my arsenal–a weapon powerful enough to threaten even a Theocratic Dictatorship. I’m afraid of losing myself to cynicism and becoming another clichéd suit whose thrills are oral arguments or clicking buttons to seal a deal. I still cringe when Big Law asks if I would be interested in leading their “international oil deals”. Now, what’s a charming way of getting out of that one, without being a Debbie Downer?

I dread accepting the notion that life is reduced to Kafkaesque meaninglessness, punctuated by superficial victories and silent despair. I worry I must walk in isolation, forever searching for something elusive. I worry about making the wrong choice and inhaling the poison. Then what becomes of all this turmoil? My parents protected me, and now it’s my turn to protect them. But what if I can’t? What if I fail?

In acknowledging my wandering mind, I become conscious of the cycle.

I grapple with concepts of liberty and freedom, corruption and governance, and fairness and equality. I aspire to help my family, to become the first woman in my lineage to attain a higher education degree, and to enact substantial progress in law. Maybe my mind is unruly; perhaps I don’t intuitively grasp codes as peers may. Yet here I am, learning and trying, even when I feel terrified to be doing it alone.

And that’s the thing: when you realize you’re caught in the cycle, the awareness itself is a break from the automatic. Being here, grappling with it, and writing about it are my forms of protest, my dance against the forces that say my mind is too dangerous.

 



ShidehZokaiyFirstEssay 2 - 23 Apr 2025 - Main.EbenMoglen
Line: 1 to 1
 
META TOPICPARENT name="FirstEssay"
Deleted:
<
<
It is strongly recommended that you include your outline in the body of your essay by using the outline as section titles. The headings below are there to remind you how section and subsection titles are formatted.
 

What is the law, anyway, and who is making it?

Line: 33 to 32
 You'll understand “law” eventually—if not, fake it on LinkedIn? ? with a fancy firm or prestigious clerkship. Work for big oil to save for your eco-friendly practice, or become a retired partner who escapes to the Swiss Alps to ‘reconnect with nature.’ Forget values, faith, family, or friendship. Work New York big law; once you get hitched and the ol’ ball n’ chain can’t take it anymore, move to the Californian suburbs to raise a family (where you might cheat with your “secretary” and start surfing to prove that you didn’t waste your physical pique on blow and all-nighters). This is the life you chose! You're too old. Too busy. Too late. Everything’s meaningless but Kafka's writings. You’re a clichéd Suit whose thrills are oral arguments or clicking buttons to seal a deal. Should you kill yourself or just have a cup of coffee? And is it better to be or not to be? Why didn’t you just suck it up and become a STEM major so you could’ve practiced patent law instead? If I just made more, I would have been done already! Now, I need to do this. How could I ever feel so rich when I was on food stamps at 10? No matter. I must work. No time 4 counterfactuals—maybe for the best.
Added:
>
>
This is a draft about escape. It escapes itself, as you can see in rereading, losing coherence as it gains momentum, breaking through the limits of narrative in a connection with its own passion. Improvement is in that sense an ironic concept: it means reasserting control and thus, in a sense, undermining the rush of freedom.

The outline is not a prison, but it is a restraint. We need to isolate the central idea, state it clearly at the outset, show where we derived it and how we develop it, and give the reader some conclusion on the basis of which she can take it further for herself. That discipline will cost some of the intensity that animates this draft, probably, but it will compensate for that loss by making it possible for the reader to think with rather than only about you.

 
You are entitled to restrict access to your paper if you want to. But we all derive immense benefit from reading one another's work, and I hope you won't feel the need unless the subject matter is personal and its disclosure would be harmful or undesirable.

ShidehZokaiyFirstEssay 1 - 20 Feb 2025 - Main.ShidehZokaiy
Line: 1 to 1
Added:
>
>
META TOPICPARENT name="FirstEssay"
It is strongly recommended that you include your outline in the body of your essay by using the outline as section titles. The headings below are there to remind you how section and subsection titles are formatted.

What is the law, anyway, and who is making it?

-- By ShidehZokaiy - 19 Feb 2025

Growing up, I thought law meant justice—the gold standard of civil behavior, peace, and freedom. If everyone followed “the law,” we would all be sitting around the fire, singing kumbaya, and things like crimes against humanity, tax evasion, presidential conspiracies defrauding The People, and jaywalking would be a thing of the past.

My parents and I came to America 14 years ago with just four suitcases. We stayed in my aunt’s guest room until my parents worked enough odd jobs to afford an apartment. My parents slept on mattresses in the living room while I kept the bedroom. Compared to Tehran, where a stick of gum cost five dollars, I lived lavishly. I wore optional uniforms to school to save on clothes. We didn’t have enough money for a tutor, so I lugged our Farsi-English dictionary to the library every day and looked up every foreign word to learn English. I wish I didn’t know any English though when my White neighbors called the police because we were speaking our, "Terrorist language too loudly,” or when his sons chased me across the courtyard, yelling, “You hairy, smelly, big-nosed monkeys are taking over!”

I still wish I couldn’t understand English when I hear First World leaders spew hate speech or preach discriminatory laws. I think of seeing my brothers in Iran beat to a pulp because they practiced a different religion or rubbing oil on my sisters’ scars from slashes received for failing to cover their hair. I was almost taken from my parents because I did ballet, which was deemed sexually provocative and therefore illegal in Iran. I was 8.

Surely, America is different. We get rights. We get freedom. We get choice. We get a voice and we get democracy! Iran’s leaders fatten on blood money and send their kids abroad for education, while the majority of domestic youth become dropouts hooked on drugs by 15. They are hypocrites who preach Sharia law but rape and murder women and children. America has it figured out!

Oliver Wendell Holmes said law was the conditions under which public force is applied in courts—what about those who sidestep the law through connections? Legal realists argue that law derives from prevailing social interests and public policy, not purely formalistic legal considerations. So how can judges craft rules against established public good notions—like bodily autonomy? If judges are paragons of morality, why does our Supreme Court include a man accused of rape and photographed while wearing black face?

I interned at a global lobbying firm after college. During negotiations, I observed renowned human rights activists involved in lucrative backchannel oil agreements that fueled Mullas’ extravagant lifestyles and helped them divert attention from their cruelty. Even the UN appeared compromised after appointing Iranian officials to women’s rights commissions. I kept going, hoping law school would help me find tangible solutions.

I now feel like an immigrant again. My peers with educated parents understand the system. LLMs make sense of codes. I don’t have time to look up words I don’t know. “It’s inefficient,” say professors and peers. How will I catch up, and what will I sacrifice along the way?

Now more than ever, American youth are disillusioned by the government. Their anxiety about health or careers are understandable with such an inconsistent system. How do judges make decisions? Shall we examine their clerks, clerks’ professors, or the legal institutions that define law and justice. Is it about the law on the books—if so, which text? Bible or Constitution? Originalist, historical, precedential, or structural lens? How much do politics and self-interests influence rulings?

Don’t waste time, you are in a capitalist society that demands you make money. An Ivy League law education opens doors, yet how can students serve the public when they're forced to see nothing but the law in heterogeneous terms and shun corporate greed that could free them from debt? How much does my voice/vote matter anyway?

I can count the number of times I’ve seen people laugh in my classes. Peers look at me like I’ve lost my mind if I react to a professor’s jokes. Only way to refrain from questioning my own sanity has been [soft]self-isolation. Musn’t… give… in…. to the comparison game. Ah, the Big Apple, waiting for me to take a bite!

You’re not here to laugh or question the institution. Live in the moment by identifying the cases and theories your professor emphasizes—distractions spark too many ideas. Noses in the books, heads in the sand. Unironic ostrich defense. Everyone knows everyone in this industry. You won’t go far by scrutinizing our great leaders!

You'll understand “law” eventually—if not, fake it on LinkedIn? ? with a fancy firm or prestigious clerkship. Work for big oil to save for your eco-friendly practice, or become a retired partner who escapes to the Swiss Alps to ‘reconnect with nature.’ Forget values, faith, family, or friendship. Work New York big law; once you get hitched and the ol’ ball n’ chain can’t take it anymore, move to the Californian suburbs to raise a family (where you might cheat with your “secretary” and start surfing to prove that you didn’t waste your physical pique on blow and all-nighters). This is the life you chose! You're too old. Too busy. Too late. Everything’s meaningless but Kafka's writings. You’re a clichéd Suit whose thrills are oral arguments or clicking buttons to seal a deal. Should you kill yourself or just have a cup of coffee? And is it better to be or not to be? Why didn’t you just suck it up and become a STEM major so you could’ve practiced patent law instead? If I just made more, I would have been done already! Now, I need to do this. How could I ever feel so rich when I was on food stamps at 10? No matter. I must work. No time 4 counterfactuals—maybe for the best.


You are entitled to restrict access to your paper if you want to. But we all derive immense benefit from reading one another's work, and I hope you won't feel the need unless the subject matter is personal and its disclosure would be harmful or undesirable. To restrict access to your paper simply delete the "#" character on the next two lines:

Note: TWiki has strict formatting rules for preference declarations. Make sure you preserve the three spaces, asterisk, and extra space at the beginning of these lines. If you wish to give access to any other users simply add them to the comma separated ALLOWTOPICVIEW list.


Revision 4r4 - 27 May 2025 - 07:09:28 - ShidehZokaiy
Revision 3r3 - 19 May 2025 - 09:59:19 - ShidehZokaiy
Revision 2r2 - 23 Apr 2025 - 14:56:49 - EbenMoglen
Revision 1r1 - 20 Feb 2025 - 04:41:10 - ShidehZokaiy
This site is powered by the TWiki collaboration platform.
All material on this collaboration platform is the property of the contributing authors.
All material marked as authored by Eben Moglen is available under the license terms CC-BY-SA version 4.
Syndicate this site RSSATOM