Law in Contemporary Society

View   r4  >  r3  ...
OkontaPSecondEssay 4 - 05 Jun 2016 - Main.EbenMoglen
Line: 1 to 1
 
META TOPICPARENT name="SecondEssay"
Deleted:
<
<
It is strongly recommended that you include your outline in the body of your essay by using the outline as section titles. The headings below are there to remind you how section and subsection titles are formatted.
 

Coded Language: John Brown as an American Patriot

Line: 34 to 33
 Individuals opposed to the actions of Brown often point to Martin Luther King Jr., as a respectable man, that championed for social and legal change without the use of violence. Yet, these respectability politics are limited. The Civil Rights Movement of the 1960s was maintained through the highly publicized and politicalized access to vicious attacks on people of color perpetuated by white supremacists. Now, while King has claimed that violence begets violence, his participation in illegal marches, sit-ins, and boycotts (at the very least), show that illegal actions often move and accelarate social movements and society towards justice. MLK writes that, “man-made law” is “no law at all,” when it is, “out of harmony with the moral law” and “is not rooted in eternal and natural law.” Legal action is not always the best action when freedom from a powerful oppressor is being pursued. A man-made law that oppresses another is not in sync with natural law and must be defeated, even if through "illegal" actions. John Brown, the patriot, embodied this ideal. American superhero. American patriot.
Added:
>
>
I'm not sure where this draft advances over what we discussed in the classroom. The point of bringing Thoreau's plea for Brown into the group was to create the moment of which this essay is an echo. We both understand the points of view represented here as right and wrong. We see that they are little closer now than they were 155 years ago when the Civil War ended.

But our effort is not to discover the abyss. It is to appreciate the mechanisms by which a society deals with the breadth of its differences. The point isn't that as lawyers we are supposed to be against slavery. That will be true everywhere except where it isn't. The point is that we must understand all the forces on the board, including the ones that aren't supposed to exist or that we're not supposed to allow ourselves to see, in order to do what we are actually supposed to do, which is to produce justice.

 
You are entitled to restrict access to your paper if you want to. But we all derive immense benefit from reading one another's work, and I hope you won't feel the need unless the subject matter is personal and its disclosure would be harmful or undesirable. To restrict access to your paper simply delete the "#" character on the next two lines:

Revision 4r4 - 05 Jun 2016 - 22:01:41 - EbenMoglen
Revision 3r3 - 11 Apr 2016 - 18:49:44 - OkontaP
This site is powered by the TWiki collaboration platform.
All material on this collaboration platform is the property of the contributing authors.
All material marked as authored by Eben Moglen is available under the license terms CC-BY-SA version 4.
Syndicate this site RSSATOM