Law in Contemporary Society

View   r20  >  r19  ...
MagicAccordingToFrank 20 - 05 Feb 2008 - Main.AdamGold
Line: 1 to 1
 
META TOPICPARENT name="TextDiscussionCohenandFrank"
Eben alluded to us not quite getting the meaning of "magic" according to Frank. Let's use this space to work it out. -- AdamCarlis - 02 Feb 2008
Line: 85 to 85
 

-- JuliaS - 05 Feb 2008

Added:
>
>

I firmly agree with JuliaS? above. I read Frank to be pointing out the true nature of our subjective legal system. I think "unavoidable" is the proper term to describe the intangible mechanisms that get us from dispute to resolution.

Basically, whether we choose to subject someone to the Ordeals or whether we subject them to a jury trial, there will be an element of human subjecitvity, maybe even magic!!, that we as a society must accept. In fact, I believe that a thorough reading of Frank lends the inference that a bit of magic may be necessary for a functioning legal system. After all, without omnipotent and omnicient judges and juries, how else would we find OJ not guilty?

-- AdamGold? - 05 Feb 2008

 
 
<--/commentPlugin-->
\ No newline at end of file

Revision 20r20 - 05 Feb 2008 - 04:49:53 - AdamGold?
Revision 19r19 - 05 Feb 2008 - 02:08:57 - JuliaS
This site is powered by the TWiki collaboration platform.
All material on this collaboration platform is the property of the contributing authors.
All material marked as authored by Eben Moglen is available under the license terms CC-BY-SA version 4.
Syndicate this site RSSATOM