Law in Contemporary Society

View   r4  >  r3  >  r2  >  r1
JamesHebishFirstEssay 4 - 24 May 2023 - Main.EbenMoglen
Line: 1 to 1
 
META TOPICPARENT name="FirstEssay"
Line: 8 to 8
 In many Islamic countries, alcohol is taboo, not just among the Muslims, but among the Christians as well. Shisha, on the other hand, fair game. A lot of this has to do with the contexts in which each drug is consumed: shisha in a relaxed communal setting, and alcohol in a nightclub setting. Accordingly, the moral condemnation reaches alcohol but often creates an exception for shisha.
Added:
>
>
Perhaps also that the Qur'an prohibits alcohol, while tobacco was unknown to the Prophet (if not also to the Most High) in the 7th century.

 In the US, things are not so clear-cut. In 2016, the smoking age in my native California was raised to 21 years old. Technically, this meant that nobody under the age of 21 could be present in a hookah lounge throughout the state. Practically, every hookah lounge in Anaheim (where there is a high concentration of Arabs) disregarded this law. I’ve grew up seeing babies around hookah and at one point was one of those babies myself.

This inconsistency gets at a fundamental difference between shisha culture in the United States and in the Middle East. Throughout the Arab world, cafes are places of congregation and community, where friends go to banter, watch a soccer game, and generally chill–– Hookah is merely accessory to the experience, not unlike tea or coffee. Many places that serve shisha also serve delicious Arab food, my favorite place being a Café called Cairo in Anahiem, CA.

Line: 34 to 39
 Gardenia Terrace is where many of those differences meet, making it a worth investigating further.
Added:
>
>
This seems rather a good deal to conclude from a single instance. Perhaps a trip to Atlantic Avenue would have yielded different insights. This is rather like judging the meaning of pizza after one trip to Serafina's (or V&T).
 


JamesHebishFirstEssay 3 - 18 May 2023 - Main.JamesHebish
Line: 1 to 1
 
META TOPICPARENT name="FirstEssay"
Changed:
<
<

The Kibbutz: A Case Study for Successful Socialism

>
>

Gardenia Terrace: Perversion or Evolution?

 
Changed:
<
<
-- By JamesHebish - 16 Feb 2023
>
>
-- By JamesHebish - 18 May 2023
 
Added:
>
>
In many Islamic countries, alcohol is taboo, not just among the Muslims, but among the Christians as well. Shisha, on the other hand, fair game. A lot of this has to do with the contexts in which each drug is consumed: shisha in a relaxed communal setting, and alcohol in a nightclub setting. Accordingly, the moral condemnation reaches alcohol but often creates an exception for shisha.
 
Added:
>
>
In the US, things are not so clear-cut. In 2016, the smoking age in my native California was raised to 21 years old. Technically, this meant that nobody under the age of 21 could be present in a hookah lounge throughout the state. Practically, every hookah lounge in Anaheim (where there is a high concentration of Arabs) disregarded this law. I’ve grew up seeing babies around hookah and at one point was one of those babies myself.
 
Added:
>
>
This inconsistency gets at a fundamental difference between shisha culture in the United States and in the Middle East. Throughout the Arab world, cafes are places of congregation and community, where friends go to banter, watch a soccer game, and generally chill–– Hookah is merely accessory to the experience, not unlike tea or coffee. Many places that serve shisha also serve delicious Arab food, my favorite place being a Café called Cairo in Anahiem, CA.
 
Changed:
<
<

Socialism on the Rise in the US.

>
>
The effects of hookah are generally conducive to this experience. Shisha is not so much a party drug as it is a mellow experience. Smoking shisha makes one feel dizzy, lightheaded, and relaxed. Like most drugs, it is harmful to one’s long-term health–– but that is not the point of this writing.
 
Changed:
<
<
There is no doubt that socialism is on the rise in the United States. In the classroom, the presumption that socialism is not an effective means of managing a society has been called into question. Today, 18–34-year-olds are almost evenly split between those who view capitalism positively and those who view it negatively (49% vs. 46%). Two years ago, that margin was a gaping 20 points (58% vs. 38%) (Axios). Critics of socialism assert that the shrinking of this margin is tied to a lack of education in prior failed attempts of socialism. Certainly, the destruction caused by socialism in the People’s Republic of China and in the Soviet Union is not to be disregarded lightly.
>
>
Being the youngest of my cousins in the US, I experienced hookah exclusively in a communal setting. I didn’t realize until my teenage years that hookah even carried the stigma associated with drugs, because the experience was never about the drug itself. The times in which I’ve laughed the hardest were often in that setting, eased along by the relaxation from shisha, perhaps, but not because of it.
 
Added:
>
>
Since moving to New York, I’ve yet to find a good shisha place. In the process of looking for one, I brought my friends to a hookah lounge near Lincoln Center called Gardenia Terrace. It wasn’t home, but it wasn’t bad either: the scene was very formal, music loud, and hookah pretty good–– also the cheesecake was great. Still, my experience at Gardenia Terrace was different and I think those differences are worth exploring.
 
Added:
>
>
It was clear to me from the moment we arrived that this was not a hookah lounge, it was some sort of nightclub. In contrast to the lounge-like seating or couches I was used to, Gardenia Terrace has stools (with no backing) seated around a high table, more or less like you would encounter at a cocktail lounge. Once we were seated at our table the waitress brought out 2 menus: one for shisha and another for drinks–– the first indicator that hookah itself was no longer an accessory I was used to, but something more. This was made clear to me upon examination of the hookah menu, where I saw the various “upgrades” available. Premium hookahs (which stood taller) were available for an additional fee. You could also pay extra to have a “fruit head’, which adds half of a watermelon or pineapple to the tube directly below the container where the tobacco lives, making zero difference in flavor but gives the shisha more of a luxury, fruity, aesthetic.
 
Changed:
<
<

Successful Socialism: The Kibbutz

>
>
No longer a conduit to the gathering, Hookah had become a status symbol: the more embellished and ornamented your hookah was, the more attention it attracted, and the more attention it attracted, the more people would be attracted to you (at least in theory). This was reflected in price: the $25 shisha you’d find in Anaheim cost $120 at Gardenia Terrace.
 
Added:
>
>
Back home, smoking hookah was often the precursor to a night out or where we ended up subsequently–– never the main event. Not so here: it was just loud enough to make it inconvenient to talk, or at least for an extended amount of time. And all without a single backgammon set in sight.
 
Added:
>
>
Although fun, Gardenia Terrace is a perversion of what shisha stands for and more importantly, symbolic of the suffocation of Arab culture in the West. Aside from the fact that the experience of nicotine via hookah is inconsistent with the overall ambience of a nightclub, the vibe itself was a perversion of an Arab café–– neither completely a nightclub nor completely a café. Not a place to get wasted, but also not a place to relax with friends. A place to be seen, but not a place to speak. It was something in between.
 
Changed:
<
<
But not all attempts have failed. In the early 20th century, early examples of successful agricultural socialist communities cropped in then-Palestine. These communities, called “Kibbutz” (translating to gathering or clustering), embraced socialist values and consisted mostly of eastern European jews seeking refuge from antisemitism. All members of the kibbutz were viewed as equals: children slept in children’s houses, only seeing their parents a few times a day, and women regarded their husbands as “my man” rather than the customary “my master”. Perhaps most importantly, the Kibbutz did not embrace private property. Rather, they embraced a communal conceptualization of land that was based on the amalgam of community effort invested in it agriculturally. As Austrian psychologist, Bruno Bettelheim, put it, “nowhere more than in the kibbutz did I realize the degree to which private property, in the deep layers of the mind, relates to private emotions. If one is absent, the other tends to be absent as well".
>
>
That something in between is immigrant experience, and even more-so experience of the child of immigrants. Just as the immigrant struggles to maintain family balance in a country that seems to be hell-bent on idolizing work, so does the Gardenia Terrace make it easy to blow off steam at the expensive of community-building. Unfortunately, it doesn’t seem to do either very well.
 
Added:
>
>
Of course, Gardenia Terrace is not unique in this sense. There are hundreds, if not thousands of lounges like this throughout the US and the western world. Shisha is inexpensive to serve (as evidenced by the variance in price), making it a profitable business, especially in a nightclub context where ordering it is performative. Ultimately, this conversation is not so much about shisha as it is community–– or the lack thereof here.
 
Changed:
<
<

Threats to the Kibbutz

>
>
The migration of shisha to the West matches the migration of those who brought it: for better or (probably) worse, families here are not as close as they are in the middle east, and maybe Gardenia Terrace is the reason why. My extended family in Egypt sees each other weekly, if not more than that. Here, my extended family sees each other only on holidays. Community is not as strong in the west, and there are many reasons to blame for this, social media addiction not being the last of them.
 
Added:
>
>
Gardenia Terrace is where many of those differences meet, making it a worth investigating further.
 
Deleted:
<
<
In the 1950’s other groups of Jews from countries such as Morocco, Tunisia, and Iraqi joined the community and with their arrival came ideological and cultural disagreement. By this time, the newly formed state of Israel had aligned itself with the United States and other Western countries. Differing beliefs on who Israel should align with led to the segregation of many Kibbutzniks, whose way of life was very much based on socialist principles at odds with a Western alignment.

Ultimately, Kibbutz that failed to maintain a uniform makeup of Eastern European Jews experienced a declining sense of common identity among members of their community. Exacerbating this conflict, the introduction of the TV exposed members of the Kibbutz to societies where individuals were compensated for their work directly and maintained agency to do with their money as they saw fit. This glimpse into an alternative society combined with the decreasing ability of members to identify with their countryman marked a significant transition for the Kibbutz: Kibbutzniks began to prioritize the individual over the community. The common culture and values that previously served as a sort of communal glue (or trust) began to weaken, and so did the Kibbutz. Although many Kibbutz still survive today, it is worth noting that the ones that have are primarily made up of Eastern European Jews.

Lessons for the United States

If the Kibbutz is to be used as a case study for Socialism, it does not bode well for a full application of it in the United States. Not only does the US lack a uniform population, it goes beyond by embraces differences. Deeply embedded in our constitution and society is the belief that one has right to follow the values and beliefs of their choice so long as they don’t infringe on the safety of others. In other words, we value individual freedom, bur arguably not communal freedom, which would perhaps encompass a basic standard of living and wage for each member of society. The streets of Skid Row tell a different story.

Furthermore, the current framework of social media poses a much bigger risk to the successful application of Socialism in the US than the Television did to the Kibbutz. Not only does it expose lavish lifestyles of other individuals, it goes so far as to tailor that very exposure to what the user would want most. This serves as a constant addicting temptation to prioritize one’s self over the group.

Covid-19 proved an opportune moment for countries that embraced communal good to shine and countries that prioritized individual freedoms to fail. Countries with uniform populations were quick to abide by mask mandates and receive the vaccine when it became available. Even if one was young and healthy, it made sense to vaccinate in order to eliminate the risk of harm to elderly countryman–– so long as you could sufficiently identify yourself with those countryman. Meanwhile in Los Angeles, a fight over masks led to gunfire outside a Los Angeles store and a rapper named Jerry Lewis was killed. It is not difficult to see that Americans have a difficult time with even the most minor of inconveniences when they come at the expense of their individuality.

Would it work? Maybe.

Although there are certainly elements of socialism that have been and can be integrated into capitalism to make its effects less harsh, the conditions of the United States do not seem likely to successfully host a full-fledged attempt at socialism. This analysis herein is tamed not just by its depth, but also by the fact that there are other pre-conditions to socialism not explored in this paper. Still, perhaps increased enthusiasm towards socialism will lead to adaptation where it is possible and approach some happy medium. In future research, It could prove meaningful to explore whether individualism or difference came first in the US. After all, the colonists had a lot in common.

I'm not sure what the real subject of the draft is. If the subject is the role of the kibbutzim (that's the plural of "kibbutz") in Israeli society, the literature is large. Not only would the reader have benefited from some useful directions, but you might have also found a little reading useful for your own purposes. (The idea of kibbutz dwellers as like Amish, drawn into knowledge of a different world by TV, is risible.) It would be more valuable and insightful, I suspect, to write about the actual fate of the kibbutzim as graphic design collectives in Tel Aviv employing Thai and Romanian farm laborers when Palestinians became unemployable.

I think, however, that this might not actually be an essay about actual kibbutzim, but rather about the possibility of utopian socialism (which at the end, despite all the Zionist speculation, you want us to understand is "not likely" in the US). Why the kibbutz is "real" socialism where Amana isn't, or Shakers weren't, or whether Iowa isn't the US, I'm not sure I understand. As I don't know what to make of the assertion that New Zealand, which did very well at keeping its people from dying during the Covid epidemic, doesn't "prioritize[] individual freedoms." I should think the last twelve weeks in China would have disposed of the whole supposed distinction between "collectivist" success and "individualist" failure as junk sociology.

So what is the central theme to carry forward in the next draft? If you mean to make this about the distinctively Zionist commune structure of the kibbutzim, we need some real history. If the theme is the social importance of experimental egalitarian communes to American socialism, why not write about some? Is there any utility in defining socialism?

 


JamesHebishFirstEssay 2 - 26 Feb 2023 - Main.EbenMoglen
Line: 1 to 1
 
META TOPICPARENT name="FirstEssay"
Line: 46 to 46
 Although there are certainly elements of socialism that have been and can be integrated into capitalism to make its effects less harsh, the conditions of the United States do not seem likely to successfully host a full-fledged attempt at socialism. This analysis herein is tamed not just by its depth, but also by the fact that there are other pre-conditions to socialism not explored in this paper. Still, perhaps increased enthusiasm towards socialism will lead to adaptation where it is possible and approach some happy medium. In future research, It could prove meaningful to explore whether individualism or difference came first in the US. After all, the colonists had a lot in common.
Added:
>
>
I'm not sure what the real subject of the draft is. If the subject is the role of the kibbutzim (that's the plural of "kibbutz") in Israeli society, the literature is large. Not only would the reader have benefited from some useful directions, but you might have also found a little reading useful for your own purposes. (The idea of kibbutz dwellers as like Amish, drawn into knowledge of a different world by TV, is risible.) It would be more valuable and insightful, I suspect, to write about the actual fate of the kibbutzim as graphic design collectives in Tel Aviv employing Thai and Romanian farm laborers when Palestinians became unemployable.

I think, however, that this might not actually be an essay about actual kibbutzim, but rather about the possibility of utopian socialism (which at the end, despite all the Zionist speculation, you want us to understand is "not likely" in the US). Why the kibbutz is "real" socialism where Amana isn't, or Shakers weren't, or whether Iowa isn't the US, I'm not sure I understand. As I don't know what to make of the assertion that New Zealand, which did very well at keeping its people from dying during the Covid epidemic, doesn't "prioritize[] individual freedoms." I should think the last twelve weeks in China would have disposed of the whole supposed distinction between "collectivist" success and "individualist" failure as junk sociology.

So what is the central theme to carry forward in the next draft? If you mean to make this about the distinctively Zionist commune structure of the kibbutzim, we need some real history. If the theme is the social importance of experimental egalitarian communes to American socialism, why not write about some? Is there any utility in defining socialism?

 

JamesHebishFirstEssay 1 - 17 Feb 2023 - Main.JamesHebish
Line: 1 to 1
Added:
>
>
META TOPICPARENT name="FirstEssay"

The Kibbutz: A Case Study for Successful Socialism

-- By JamesHebish - 16 Feb 2023

Socialism on the Rise in the US.

There is no doubt that socialism is on the rise in the United States. In the classroom, the presumption that socialism is not an effective means of managing a society has been called into question. Today, 18–34-year-olds are almost evenly split between those who view capitalism positively and those who view it negatively (49% vs. 46%). Two years ago, that margin was a gaping 20 points (58% vs. 38%) (Axios). Critics of socialism assert that the shrinking of this margin is tied to a lack of education in prior failed attempts of socialism. Certainly, the destruction caused by socialism in the People’s Republic of China and in the Soviet Union is not to be disregarded lightly.

Successful Socialism: The Kibbutz

But not all attempts have failed. In the early 20th century, early examples of successful agricultural socialist communities cropped in then-Palestine. These communities, called “Kibbutz” (translating to gathering or clustering), embraced socialist values and consisted mostly of eastern European jews seeking refuge from antisemitism. All members of the kibbutz were viewed as equals: children slept in children’s houses, only seeing their parents a few times a day, and women regarded their husbands as “my man” rather than the customary “my master”. Perhaps most importantly, the Kibbutz did not embrace private property. Rather, they embraced a communal conceptualization of land that was based on the amalgam of community effort invested in it agriculturally. As Austrian psychologist, Bruno Bettelheim, put it, “nowhere more than in the kibbutz did I realize the degree to which private property, in the deep layers of the mind, relates to private emotions. If one is absent, the other tends to be absent as well".

Threats to the Kibbutz

In the 1950’s other groups of Jews from countries such as Morocco, Tunisia, and Iraqi joined the community and with their arrival came ideological and cultural disagreement. By this time, the newly formed state of Israel had aligned itself with the United States and other Western countries. Differing beliefs on who Israel should align with led to the segregation of many Kibbutzniks, whose way of life was very much based on socialist principles at odds with a Western alignment.

Ultimately, Kibbutz that failed to maintain a uniform makeup of Eastern European Jews experienced a declining sense of common identity among members of their community. Exacerbating this conflict, the introduction of the TV exposed members of the Kibbutz to societies where individuals were compensated for their work directly and maintained agency to do with their money as they saw fit. This glimpse into an alternative society combined with the decreasing ability of members to identify with their countryman marked a significant transition for the Kibbutz: Kibbutzniks began to prioritize the individual over the community. The common culture and values that previously served as a sort of communal glue (or trust) began to weaken, and so did the Kibbutz. Although many Kibbutz still survive today, it is worth noting that the ones that have are primarily made up of Eastern European Jews.

Lessons for the United States

If the Kibbutz is to be used as a case study for Socialism, it does not bode well for a full application of it in the United States. Not only does the US lack a uniform population, it goes beyond by embraces differences. Deeply embedded in our constitution and society is the belief that one has right to follow the values and beliefs of their choice so long as they don’t infringe on the safety of others. In other words, we value individual freedom, bur arguably not communal freedom, which would perhaps encompass a basic standard of living and wage for each member of society. The streets of Skid Row tell a different story.

Furthermore, the current framework of social media poses a much bigger risk to the successful application of Socialism in the US than the Television did to the Kibbutz. Not only does it expose lavish lifestyles of other individuals, it goes so far as to tailor that very exposure to what the user would want most. This serves as a constant addicting temptation to prioritize one’s self over the group.

Covid-19 proved an opportune moment for countries that embraced communal good to shine and countries that prioritized individual freedoms to fail. Countries with uniform populations were quick to abide by mask mandates and receive the vaccine when it became available. Even if one was young and healthy, it made sense to vaccinate in order to eliminate the risk of harm to elderly countryman–– so long as you could sufficiently identify yourself with those countryman. Meanwhile in Los Angeles, a fight over masks led to gunfire outside a Los Angeles store and a rapper named Jerry Lewis was killed. It is not difficult to see that Americans have a difficult time with even the most minor of inconveniences when they come at the expense of their individuality.

Would it work? Maybe.

Although there are certainly elements of socialism that have been and can be integrated into capitalism to make its effects less harsh, the conditions of the United States do not seem likely to successfully host a full-fledged attempt at socialism. This analysis herein is tamed not just by its depth, but also by the fact that there are other pre-conditions to socialism not explored in this paper. Still, perhaps increased enthusiasm towards socialism will lead to adaptation where it is possible and approach some happy medium. In future research, It could prove meaningful to explore whether individualism or difference came first in the US. After all, the colonists had a lot in common.

Note: TWiki has strict formatting rules for preference declarations. If you wish to give access to any other users simply add them to the comma separated ALLOWTOPICVIEW list.


Revision 4r4 - 24 May 2023 - 17:08:26 - EbenMoglen
Revision 3r3 - 18 May 2023 - 20:35:49 - JamesHebish
Revision 2r2 - 26 Feb 2023 - 16:22:29 - EbenMoglen
Revision 1r1 - 17 Feb 2023 - 04:34:24 - JamesHebish
This site is powered by the TWiki collaboration platform.
All material on this collaboration platform is the property of the contributing authors.
All material marked as authored by Eben Moglen is available under the license terms CC-BY-SA version 4.
Syndicate this site RSSATOM