Law in Contemporary Society

View   r8  >  r7  >  r6  >  r5  >  r4  >  r3  ...
DutyandResponsibility 8 - 24 Jan 2008 - Main.KateVershov
Line: 1 to 1
 
META TOPICPARENT name="WebPreferences"
I'm actually really glad no one used the words "duty" or "responsibility" in their introductory statements. I don't believe in the concept of altruism. No one does anything from which they don't benefit and I'm glad that no one decided to declare him or herself a martyr for society. If being self-sacrificing makes you feel good, then you are benefiting from your "altruistic" act. One should commit his or her life to something they love, something that brings joy. Doing something out of guilt (which is how I see "duty") will not bring you joy or self-satisfaction in life and ultimately, you can't be truly committed or good at something you do with a groan. -- KateVershov - 24 Jan 2008
Line: 21 to 21
 -- AndrewGradman - 24 Jan 2008
Added:
>
>

Makalika- you are quite right. I am interpreting duty to mean something foisted upon us by society - such as "a duty to serve your country" by registering with the Army (I don't mean enlisting of one's own volition - I mean those papers all men had to sign before colleges would admit them). I am interpreting duty to mean an obligation imposed on you externally. I do not define helping your elderly mother as "a duty." You are (hopefully) not doing it because society says that you should. You are doing it because you love her and realize that you should take care of her in the same way that she once took care of you. This is not a duty. You do it because doing it preserves your own integrity as an individual and because you feel that it is the right thing to do. That action reflects your own value judgment as an individual rather than someone else's.

Note that a lot of us DID, in fact, write something akin to the idea that we believed in helping others. We didn't characterize it as a duty, though. We see it as the right thing to do. We see doing it as a reflection of the type of people we hope to be. It is a difference between following someone else's norms blindly and forging ahead on your own terms.

I will admit that largely this is an argument of semantics and there are many ways to define the words "duty" and "responsibility" and I am approaching it from just one perspective. But, I happen to be a pain in the ass about semantics and don't believe that any of us should be couching our life goals and ambitions within the terms of "duty" or "responsibility." We were right in not using those words. I likewise believe that if one of us had in fact used these word, Eben would have found another similarly irrelevant, but nice sounding term with which to chastise us . Sorry Eben. I realize you probably have a different, more positive paradigm through which to view these terms, but if so, I think you're quibbling with diction because the ideas that you see behind those words are in fact reflected in people's statements.

Andrew- why do you believe in altruism? Also, could you tell Santa I want a new computer this year? (I kid, I kid). And again - do you really feel a "responsibility" to do good? I don't. I am making a conscious value judgment about what is and isn't important to me in the world and I'm targeting those problems, which in my opinion are most pressing or of most interest to me. There is nothing objective about it. I feel no debt to society and I'm not entirely sure that anything about "society" per se confers any sort of responsibility on anyone to the extent that they feel that they must take on the profession of law (and 200k in debt)- especially not those people who grew up in underprivileged areas and received very few benefits to begin with.

To me, the words "duty" and "responsibility" are not related to the choices that individuals make for themselves. These are words related to the choices our government and other institutions want to guilt us into making. We make the choices that we do because we believe in them. We think they are right. They help us to go to sleep at night. At the heart of it, we do the things that make us feel best even if it means doing something to our detriment (like taking a public interest job) because the net effect on us is positive. We are capable of seeing a benefit in more than just material terms. See Maslow's hierarchy of needs.

-- KateVershov - 24 Jan 2008

 
 
<--/commentPlugin-->

DutyandResponsibility 7 - 24 Jan 2008 - Main.AndrewGradman
Line: 1 to 1
 
META TOPICPARENT name="WebPreferences"
I'm actually really glad no one used the words "duty" or "responsibility" in their introductory statements. I don't believe in the concept of altruism. No one does anything from which they don't benefit and I'm glad that no one decided to declare him or herself a martyr for society. If being self-sacrificing makes you feel good, then you are benefiting from your "altruistic" act. One should commit his or her life to something they love, something that brings joy. Doing something out of guilt (which is how I see "duty") will not bring you joy or self-satisfaction in life and ultimately, you can't be truly committed or good at something you do with a groan. -- KateVershov - 24 Jan 2008
Line: 15 to 15
 -- MakalikaNaholowaa - 24 Jan 2008
Changed:
<
<
Kate criticizes altruism, and declarations of altruism. I at least won't fault someone who won't declare it. Someone who says "I want to do good" is the functional equivalent of one who says "I feel a duty/responsibility to do good." Functionally, we'll be happier doing good when we we "want" to do it rather than when society imposes it as a "duty." By shifting the rhetoric from society to the individual, America educates us to be self-sustaining do-gooders.
>
>
I believe in altruism, but I'm with Kate in that I won't fault someone who won't declare it as their "duty" or "responsibility". Someone who says "I want to do good" is the functional equivalent of one who says "I feel a duty/responsibility to do good." If we'll be happier, and more driven, and more committed to do good, when we "want" to rather than when society imposes it as a "duty," then by all means say it like that. By shifting the rhetoric from society to the individual, America educates us to be self-sustaining in our do-goodery.
 Risk is a question for another post.

DutyandResponsibility 6 - 24 Jan 2008 - Main.MakalikaNaholowaa
Line: 1 to 1
 
META TOPICPARENT name="WebPreferences"
I'm actually really glad no one used the words "duty" or "responsibility" in their introductory statements. I don't believe in the concept of altruism. No one does anything from which they don't benefit and I'm glad that no one decided to declare him or herself a martyr for society. If being self-sacrificing makes you feel good, then you are benefiting from your "altruistic" act. One should commit his or her life to something they love, something that brings joy. Doing something out of guilt (which is how I see "duty") will not bring you joy or self-satisfaction in life and ultimately, you can't be truly committed or good at something you do with a groan. -- KateVershov - 24 Jan 2008
Line: 21 to 21
 -- AndrewGradman - 24 Jan 2008
Deleted:
<
<
Tangent: dangit! Gradman - I mean this in a way that will hopefully make you laugh, not offend you, but you are like a benchmark - when I noticed that your response was about a quarter of the length of mine, I felt like I'd failed Eben's challenge to write more succinctly and with brevity. smile

-- MakalikaNaholowaa - 24 Jan 2008

Haha fear not Makalika, no one is immune

Will the first person who finds this dialogue distracting, plz delete it. I like my chitchat private.

-- AndrewGradman - 24 Jan 2008

 
 
<--/commentPlugin-->

DutyandResponsibility 5 - 24 Jan 2008 - Main.AndrewGradman
Line: 1 to 1
 
META TOPICPARENT name="WebPreferences"
I'm actually really glad no one used the words "duty" or "responsibility" in their introductory statements. I don't believe in the concept of altruism. No one does anything from which they don't benefit and I'm glad that no one decided to declare him or herself a martyr for society. If being self-sacrificing makes you feel good, then you are benefiting from your "altruistic" act. One should commit his or her life to something they love, something that brings joy. Doing something out of guilt (which is how I see "duty") will not bring you joy or self-satisfaction in life and ultimately, you can't be truly committed or good at something you do with a groan. -- KateVershov - 24 Jan 2008
Line: 25 to 25
 Tangent: dangit! Gradman - I mean this in a way that will hopefully make you laugh, not offend you, but you are like a benchmark - when I noticed that your response was about a quarter of the length of mine, I felt like I'd failed Eben's challenge to write more succinctly and with brevity. smile

-- MakalikaNaholowaa - 24 Jan 2008

Added:
>
>

Haha fear not Makalika, no one is immune

Will the first person who finds this dialogue distracting, plz delete it. I like my chitchat private.

-- AndrewGradman - 24 Jan 2008

 
 
<--/commentPlugin-->
\ No newline at end of file

DutyandResponsibility 4 - 24 Jan 2008 - Main.MakalikaNaholowaa
Line: 1 to 1
 
META TOPICPARENT name="WebPreferences"
I'm actually really glad no one used the words "duty" or "responsibility" in their introductory statements. I don't believe in the concept of altruism. No one does anything from which they don't benefit and I'm glad that no one decided to declare him or herself a martyr for society. If being self-sacrificing makes you feel good, then you are benefiting from your "altruistic" act. One should commit his or her life to something they love, something that brings joy. Doing something out of guilt (which is how I see "duty") will not bring you joy or self-satisfaction in life and ultimately, you can't be truly committed or good at something you do with a groan. -- KateVershov - 24 Jan 2008
Line: 20 to 20
 Risk is a question for another post.

-- AndrewGradman - 24 Jan 2008

Added:
>
>

Tangent: dangit! Gradman - I mean this in a way that will hopefully make you laugh, not offend you, but you are like a benchmark - when I noticed that your response was about a quarter of the length of mine, I felt like I'd failed Eben's challenge to write more succinctly and with brevity. smile

-- MakalikaNaholowaa - 24 Jan 2008

 
 
<--/commentPlugin-->

Revision 8r8 - 24 Jan 2008 - 08:18:18 - KateVershov
Revision 7r7 - 24 Jan 2008 - 07:07:17 - AndrewGradman
Revision 6r6 - 24 Jan 2008 - 06:48:00 - MakalikaNaholowaa
Revision 5r5 - 24 Jan 2008 - 06:33:25 - AndrewGradman
Revision 4r4 - 24 Jan 2008 - 06:15:49 - MakalikaNaholowaa
Revision 3r3 - 24 Jan 2008 - 06:08:54 - AndrewGradman
This site is powered by the TWiki collaboration platform.
All material on this collaboration platform is the property of the contributing authors.
All material marked as authored by Eben Moglen is available under the license terms CC-BY-SA version 4.
Syndicate this site RSSATOM