|
DevinMcDougallFirstPaper 3 - 24 Feb 2010 - Main.DevinMcDougall
|
| |
| META TOPICPARENT | name="FirstPaper" |
|---|
| |
<
< | As I work on my essay, I thought I would post some ideas I am trying to pull together. | >
> | Climate Change, Lawyers and the Creed of Expertise | | | | |
<
< | Any feedback would be most welcome. | >
> | Climate Change: A Justice Issue | | | | |
<
< | Broadly, I am interested in what lessons I can take from LCS thus far to make me more effective at effecting the changes I would like to see in the world concerning climate change policy. | >
> | Climate change is an issue which is frequently discussed in scientific terms. In the United States, a substantial number of citizens doubt that the science of climate change is legitimate, leading to the expenditure of much energy on the part of those interested in stronger climate policies simply on defending the science. | | | | |
>
> | Despite a well-financed campaign by energy companies to sow scientific doubt, the science is in fact settled, and the most critical dimension of the climate problem now is moral. To connect to a concept frequently discussed in class, climate change represents a justice issue. Climate change should be considered a justice issue because it is a phenomenon which will inflict great amounts of unjust suffering on people. This suffering is unjust because it can be ameliorated but is not. | | | | |
<
< | Positivity, Critique and Persuasion | >
> | Having identified a moral problem which needs to be addressed, the next step is to organize a foray into politics to alter the conditions which are feeding the problem. Sociologist Harold Lasswell usefully defined politics as the process of determining "who gets what when and how." Identifying political opportunities and exploiting them requires a strategy, which can be defined as the matching of finite resources to objectives with a plan. | | | | |
<
< | I do think that part of a successful campaign for stronger climate policy in the United States has to be a positive, detailed vision of a low-carbon future. This idea sort of bubbled up and became clear to me in my dialogue with Ron and Nona about the de Saint Exupery quote she discussed on NonaFarahnikFirstPaper. The idea of focusing one's persuasive efforts on a positive vision rather than criticism is not a new idea. But I think it is nonetheless important generally, and perhaps particularly so in the context of climate activism. | >
> | Lawyers have played an important role in achieving stronger environmental protections in the United States because they have access, through their training, social capital, and law licenses, to resources which can usefully be applied to those objectives. | | | | |
<
< | On reflection, one thing that strikes me about Eben's remarks about the free software movement (linked below) is the symbiosis between positive vision and critique. Part of the reason his appeal to use free software is compelling is the undesirable consequences of proprietary software. Relating back to de Saint Exupery - it may be difficult at times to articulate a positive vision which does not contain elements of critique. More pragmatically, it may be undesirable to do so, because criticism may be a vital means of persuasion. I think the question may resolve into a tactical question about which are the effective buttons to push to motivate a particular audience.
Long-term Strategy
I am intrigued by the possibility of finding lessons for climate activism from the free software movement. Over the weekend I read a speech that Eben gave at Seattle University last March that discussed the strategy and successes of the free software movement. If you haven't read this piece, I recommend it. I am less informed than I would like to be about the history of the free software movement, but from Eben's narrative, it seems to be an example of a social movement struggling relatively successfully against very powerful and wealthy antagonists. Eben states:
"Things have changed. Something is happening which has never happened before, and it changes the outcome of the game. We are exactly where we have always been, with respect to what we want, but the methods of gaining it have changed, and they are now possible in ways that they were never possible before. And the great riddle of romantic socialist politics, the great worry of the French revolution, the great difficulty that has presented itself to every struggle for human equality since the beginning of the struggle, has been lifted in substantial part. Because we now live in a world where we can make enough for everybody with our own hands. Because we are capable of achieving the relationship we needed to achieve: From each according to his ability, and to each according to his need.
...We are ready now.
That doesn’t mean there isn’t any work to do. Fortunately there is plenty of work to do. For lawyers, moreover.
But there is good news about it. Because we have been doing it for a very long time, and it has wearied many a loyal person, and it has worn out many a strong one. The difference is: This time we win."
What is the most effective work for lawyers in climate activism? Are there lessons from the role of lawyers in the free software movement? The role that lawyers have played in social justice movements more generally? Are the structural changes that Eben cites as relevant to the free software movement relevant to climate activism? If yes, are they being utilized as effectively as possible?
It is strongly recommended that you include your outline in the body of your essay by using the outline as section titles. The headings below are there to remind you how section and subsection titles are formatted.
Paper Title
-- By DevinMcDougall - 09 Feb 2010
Section I | >
> | A set of resources which have been used to great effect by those seeking change in America are what Thurman Arnold calls creeds. | | | Subsection A | | | Subsection A
Subsection B | |
<
< |
You are entitled to restrict access to your paper if you want to. But we all derive immense benefit from reading one another's work, and I hope you won't feel the need unless the subject matter is personal and its disclosure would be harmful or undesirable.
To restrict access to your paper simply delete the "#" on the next line:
# * Set ALLOWTOPICVIEW = TWikiAdminGroup, DevinMcDougall
Note: TWiki has strict formatting rules. Make sure you preserve the three spaces, asterisk, and extra space at the beginning of that line. If you wish to give access to any other users simply add them to the comma separated list |
|
|
DevinMcDougallFirstPaper 2 - 22 Feb 2010 - Main.DevinMcDougall
|
| |
| META TOPICPARENT | name="FirstPaper" |
|---|
| |
>
> | As I work on my essay, I thought I would post some ideas I am trying to pull together.
Any feedback would be most welcome.
Broadly, I am interested in what lessons I can take from LCS thus far to make me more effective at effecting the changes I would like to see in the world concerning climate change policy.
Positivity, Critique and Persuasion
I do think that part of a successful campaign for stronger climate policy in the United States has to be a positive, detailed vision of a low-carbon future. This idea sort of bubbled up and became clear to me in my dialogue with Ron and Nona about the de Saint Exupery quote she discussed on NonaFarahnikFirstPaper. The idea of focusing one's persuasive efforts on a positive vision rather than criticism is not a new idea. But I think it is nonetheless important generally, and perhaps particularly so in the context of climate activism.
On reflection, one thing that strikes me about Eben's remarks about the free software movement (linked below) is the symbiosis between positive vision and critique. Part of the reason his appeal to use free software is compelling is the undesirable consequences of proprietary software. Relating back to de Saint Exupery - it may be difficult at times to articulate a positive vision which does not contain elements of critique. More pragmatically, it may be undesirable to do so, because criticism may be a vital means of persuasion. I think the question may resolve into a tactical question about which are the effective buttons to push to motivate a particular audience.
Long-term Strategy
I am intrigued by the possibility of finding lessons for climate activism from the free software movement. Over the weekend I read a speech that Eben gave at Seattle University last March that discussed the strategy and successes of the free software movement. If you haven't read this piece, I recommend it. I am less informed than I would like to be about the history of the free software movement, but from Eben's narrative, it seems to be an example of a social movement struggling relatively successfully against very powerful and wealthy antagonists. Eben states:
"Things have changed. Something is happening which has never happened before, and it changes the outcome of the game. We are exactly where we have always been, with respect to what we want, but the methods of gaining it have changed, and they are now possible in ways that they were never possible before. And the great riddle of romantic socialist politics, the great worry of the French revolution, the great difficulty that has presented itself to every struggle for human equality since the beginning of the struggle, has been lifted in substantial part. Because we now live in a world where we can make enough for everybody with our own hands. Because we are capable of achieving the relationship we needed to achieve: From each according to his ability, and to each according to his need.
...We are ready now.
That doesn’t mean there isn’t any work to do. Fortunately there is plenty of work to do. For lawyers, moreover.
But there is good news about it. Because we have been doing it for a very long time, and it has wearied many a loyal person, and it has worn out many a strong one. The difference is: This time we win."
What is the most effective work for lawyers in climate activism? Are there lessons from the role of lawyers in the free software movement? The role that lawyers have played in social justice movements more generally? Are the structural changes that Eben cites as relevant to the free software movement relevant to climate activism? If yes, are they being utilized as effectively as possible? | | |
It is strongly recommended that you include your outline in the body of your essay by using the outline as section titles. The headings below are there to remind you how section and subsection titles are formatted. |
|
|
DevinMcDougallFirstPaper 1 - 09 Feb 2010 - Main.DevinMcDougall
|
|
>
> |
| META TOPICPARENT | name="FirstPaper" |
|---|
It is strongly recommended that you include your outline in the body of your essay by using the outline as section titles. The headings below are there to remind you how section and subsection titles are formatted.
Paper Title
-- By DevinMcDougall - 09 Feb 2010
Section I
Subsection A
Subsub 1
Subsection B
Subsub 1
Subsub 2
Section II
Subsection A
Subsection B
You are entitled to restrict access to your paper if you want to. But we all derive immense benefit from reading one another's work, and I hope you won't feel the need unless the subject matter is personal and its disclosure would be harmful or undesirable.
To restrict access to your paper simply delete the "#" on the next line:
# * Set ALLOWTOPICVIEW = TWikiAdminGroup, DevinMcDougall
Note: TWiki has strict formatting rules. Make sure you preserve the three spaces, asterisk, and extra space at the beginning of that line. If you wish to give access to any other users simply add them to the comma separated list |
|
|
|
|
This site is powered by the TWiki collaboration platform.
All material on this collaboration platform is the property of the contributing authors.
All material marked as authored by Eben Moglen is available under the license terms CC-BY-SA version 4.
|
|