Law in Contemporary Society

View   r3  >  r2  ...
BrandonReidFirstEssay 3 - 21 May 2023 - Main.BrandonReid
Changed:
<
<
Revision 2 is unreadable
>
>
META TOPICPARENT name="FirstEssay"
It is strongly recommended that you include your outline in the body of your essay by using the outline as section titles. The headings below are there to remind you how section and subsection titles are formatted.

Legal Education- A Personal Reflection

-- By BrandonReid - 17 Feb 2023

Earlier this semester, I wrote a piece that demonstrated frustration towards my legal education thus far. Since then, I have adopted a different mindset, which brings about a perspective that was not present when I wrote my earlier piece. A few months ago, I understood myself as the subject of Columbia Law School’s curriculum. More specifically, I was subject to whatever education was to be imposed on me, without agency in articulating my law school experience.

That mindset fails to pass any logical review. The student-university relationship is somewhat similar to an affiliation shared between a customer and seller. This analogy is most apparent in the student’s payment of tuition to the university. Following this parallel, I would ask myself, do customers passively accept whatever the seller provides? In my experiences as a customer, the answer is no. As a customer, I have certain anticipations that I expect the seller to meet. My new mindset as a student is related to his way of operating.

From this point on, I am going to be in control of my legal education because after all, this experience is for me, not the institution. I came to Columbia Law School to become the lawyer I envision myself as being. Thus, I am responsible for making sure that I get what I need.

In my earlier piece, I mentioned certain injustices that I hoped to learn to legally address. However, further reflection on my past work leads me to believe that I already know much of the strategy needed to bring about the changes I hope to see in society. After all, I have proven this to myself in past work that I undertook prior to law school. I cannot forget the work that I have already been successful in completing, as doing so would be counterproductive in my becoming a lawyer.

When I think of what’s necessary to achieve the goals that I have as a lawyer, which currently are to contribute to the eradication of the school-to-prison pipeline and to challenge injustices that come to my attention, one common theme arises: I need to have meetings. I need to have meetings to connect, learn, and ultimately advance my agenda as a lawyer. During these next two years, I can use my law school education to prepare myself for those meetings.

By prepare for those meetings, I mean a few things. I need to understand whose wisdom could be helpful in guiding me along my legal path. I also must know what understanding I currently lack in the areas in which I am interested. Finally, I must know how to frame and execute my “ask” in my future meetings. Every meeting that I engage in will have a purpose. As a lawyer, it will be important for me to know how to make that purpose transparent for those with whom I meet.

I can currently think of a few ways that I can prepare myself for meetings during the next two years at Columbia Law School. First, I can take classes with professors who I believe are most relevant to my desired path as a lawyer. Second, I can take on work as a law student to gain clarity on what meetings I need to eventually have. Finally, I can begin to arrange and engage in the meetings that I think need to take place. For the remainder of this piece, I will describe the specifics of each step that I will take going forward.

As for studying under professors who I believe are most relevant to my path, I plan to take classes with those whose work has intersected with the school-to-prison pipeline, even indirectly. I will not only select professors who I think are on my side of the battle, but also those who with whom I may clash. By learning from those who many might consider to be “obstacles” to the path to justice, I will be able to understand their approaches to the issue. Having a strong understanding of their approaches, I will be best prepared to counter similar approaches that may arise in the meetings that I have. And by hearing from those who have achieved what I would consider to be success in challenging the school-to-prison pipeline, they might be able to help me understand what worked in the meetings along their career paths.

How will I know what meetings to have if I lack the work experience? I will not know what meetings to have. It is important that before I graduate, I continue to get practical experience related to the school-to-prison pipeline. I need to meet the victims and the agents who drive the phenomenon’s function to understand the meetings that need to be had. These work experiences can serve as evidence to support my “asks” that I bring to each of the future meetings that I have with folks.

With the insight that I continue to gain during my time as a law student, there is no reason why I should wait to have the meetings that I believe need to take place. Even after law school, my understanding of the issue and strategies to approach it will continually be evolving, so I might as well start having meetings. By having the meetings, I will also gain experience on what I need to do to further improve for future meetings. Last week, for instance, I met with the Public Defender’s office for my hometown and despite the meeting being a success, I identified ways in which I can do better in future situations. This reflection is valuable in becoming the lawyer I envision in my future.

In closing, I want to acknowledge that this approach to law school will be constantly evolving, and many edits could be made to this plan. There is beauty in leaving the door open to change, and I plan to cherish that possibility for adjustment as I go forward.

I take this as wish fulfillment, as a speech you wish to give but can only imagine yourself giving.

You know, to be sure, that the first sixteen weeks of law school couldn't have done all that you had been expecting even had they done nothing else, and at a minimum they had at least to teach you the language by immersion before important matters could be discussed in it. By emphasizing the profound importance of personal considerations in your education, you also show why it would always be crucial that your legal education be shaped for you and by you, which the first term's table d'hôte menu can only accidentally further while it gets the rest of the job done.

The tone of disappointment shading into outrage is appropriate to the dream-like imaginary quality of the context. But you can't conclude on it, because in the end the responsibility to make the education work for you is validly on you. The next draft, therefore, can afford to start where this one ends, with the concrete task of making your educational program suit your needs.


You are entitled to restrict access to your paper if you want to. But we all derive immense benefit from reading one another's work, and I hope you won't feel the need unless the subject matter is personal and its disclosure would be harmful or undesirable. To restrict access to your paper simply delete the "#" character on the next two lines:

Note: TWiki has strict formatting rules for preference declarations. Make sure you preserve the three spaces, asterisk, and extra space at the beginning of these lines. If you wish to give access to any other users simply add them to the comma separated ALLOWTOPICVIEW list.


Revision 3r3 - 21 May 2023 - 01:57:08 - BrandonReid
Revision 2r2 - 25 Feb 2023 - 16:08:52 - EbenMoglen
This site is powered by the TWiki collaboration platform.
All material on this collaboration platform is the property of the contributing authors.
All material marked as authored by Eben Moglen is available under the license terms CC-BY-SA version 4.
Syndicate this site RSSATOM