Law in Contemporary Society

View   r49  >  r48  ...
AndrewGradman-SecondPaper 49 - 11 Apr 2008 - Main.RyanMcDevitt
Line: 1 to 1
 
META TOPICPARENT name="WebPreferences"
READY TO BE GRADED
Line: 42 to 42
 Anyways, I really enjoyed this paper. It is very honest. I recommend getting a new checklist from an experience that allows you to connect and relate to people from different walks of life. I'll comment more later... I want to think about this some more.

-- JosephMacias - 11 Apr 2008

Added:
>
>		This paper is fascinating. But to the significant degree to which it refers to the recent senate election, it is monumentally and pathetically self-serving. Andrew, it is not a matter of misunderstood genius to fail to win an election that you fail to take seriously. I cast six votes out of my allotted 15 in this election: one for each candidate who took it at least somewhat seriously. I am not the only one who disregarded candidates who did not articulate why they sought office. My votes included some incumbents, some non-incumbents (admittedly including myself), but not you, because your candidacy statement consisted almost entirely of one-liners. Funny, yes; enough to knock an incumbent out of office, never. It was not misunderstood genius that lost you the election, it was arrogance. The more I think about this essay, well-written as it may be, the more I am struck by your choice to list the phonetic pronunciation of your proper name on Lawnet as "your majesty."
 \ No newline at end of file

Revision 49r49 - 11 Apr 2008 - 07:50:55 - RyanMcDevitt
Revision 48r48 - 11 Apr 2008 - 07:19:33 - AndrewGradman
This site is powered by the TWiki collaboration platform.
All material on this collaboration platform is the property of the contributing authors.
All material marked as authored by Eben Moglen is available under the license terms CC-BY-SA version 4.
Syndicate this site RSSATOM