Computers, Privacy & the Constitution

View   r1
JohnClaytonFirstPaper 1 - 12 Mar 2021 - Main.JohnClayton
Line: 1 to 1
Added:
>
>
META TOPICPARENT name="FirstPaper"

It is strongly recommended that you include your outline in the body of your essay by using the outline as section titles. The headings below are there to remind you how section and subsection titles are formatted.

Geofence Warrants: The Fourth Amendment as Public Relations Tool

-- By JohnClayton - 12 Mar 2021

Every now and then the Constitution can be good for business. Take the case of Google and geofence warrants. Five years ago, law enforcement agencies began requesting from Google location data for phones linked to specific geographic areas and time periods. Police investigating a bank robbery, for example, might ask for location data of phones that passed within 100 feet of the bank in the 30 minutes before and after the robbery. Investigators then analyze the data to pursue and develop leads.

Geofence warrants are controversial. They may be unconstitutional. But as a matter of Fourth Amendment law, it is debatable whether police even need a warrant to request and receive geofence data from a third-party.

None of this, however, has stopped Google from setting its own quasi-constitutional ground rules for geofence data requests. Google refuses to respond to such requests without a warrant, and it only provides anonymized data (at least initially). And since Google is effectively the only company to receive geofence search requests—thanks to its uniquely extensive database—its judgment on the Fourth Amendment status of geofence searches is final (at least for now).

One could applaud Google for going “above and beyond.” But this example reveals the precarious nature of citizen-state privacy in a world in which third-parties are both the primary facilitators of government surveillance and active shapers of Fourth Amendment norms. Google’s lawyers are not a constitutional court, and unless we are to believe a company built on spying has suddenly had an ethical revelation, there must be something else at play here. What good are Fourth Amendment values, when their scope is contingent on a private party’s business interests?

Section I

Subsection A

Subsub 1

Subsection B

Subsub 1

Subsub 2

Section II

Subsection A

Subsection B


You are entitled to restrict access to your paper if you want to. But we all derive immense benefit from reading one another's work, and I hope you won't feel the need unless the subject matter is personal and its disclosure would be harmful or undesirable. To restrict access to your paper simply delete the "#" character on the next two lines:

Note: TWiki has strict formatting rules for preference declarations. Make sure you preserve the three spaces, asterisk, and extra space at the beginning of these lines. If you wish to give access to any other users simply add them to the comma separated ALLOWTOPICVIEW list.


Revision 1r1 - 12 Mar 2021 - 22:10:16 - JohnClayton
This site is powered by the TWiki collaboration platform.
All material on this collaboration platform is the property of the contributing authors.
All material marked as authored by Eben Moglen is available under the license terms CC-BY-SA version 4.
Syndicate this site RSSATOM