| |
| META TOPICPARENT | name="WebPreferences" |
|---|
-- PaulineAbijaoude - 25 Apr 2018 | | | A number of promoters were interested in building up the town of Cairo and connecting it to Galena through a central railroad, securing a charter from the State of Illinois in 1843 and creating a railroad company. However, the charter protected the state's interests too well and the promoters could not raise the necessary capital. There was then an effort to procure a grant of preemption rights from Congress in order to assist the company in financing the railroad. This effort was blocked by Stephen Douglas who instead wanted a grant of land from Congress, and a change in route so that Chicago and not Cairo, is the feeder for the railroad.
Notes
:
:
:
:
| |
<
< | In 1850, Stepehn Douglas succeeded in obtaining the grant of land, in addition to a right-of-way for the Illinois Central railroad project, with a branch heading to Chicago. The terms of the grant provided that the state was to receive the alternate sections of land for six-miles out on each side of the line of track, which it should then sell, using the funds to build the railroad. The remaining public land was to be sold at double-minimum and U.S. troops were to be transported free of charge. Isaac Walker, the Senator from Wisconsin, spoke out against the double-minimum price required for the sale of both government and railroad lands under the grant because of the impact it would have on settlers. However, at the time the public attitude towards the railroads was still positive and soon the success of the Illinois Central railroad woudl only prompt more investment into railroad companies.
Notes
:
:
:
:
:
| >
> | In 1850, Stephen Douglas succeeded in obtaining the grant of land, in addition to a right-of-way for the Illinois Central railroad project, with a branch heading to Chicago. The terms of the grant provided that the state was to receive the alternate sections of land for six-miles out on each side of the line of track, which it should then sell, using the funds to build the railroad. The remaining public land was to be sold at double-minimum and U.S. troops were to be transported free of charge. Isaac Walker, the Senator from Wisconsin, spoke out against the double-minimum price required for the sale of both government and railroad lands under the grant because of the impact it would have on settlers. However, at the time the public attitude towards the railroads was still positive and soon the success of the Illinois Central railroad would only prompt more investment into railroad companies. | | | | |
<
< | The Illinois Central sought out immigrants in order to sell its land and generate funds. In the decade of the 1860s, the population of Illinois increased more than that of any other state in the Union, with thousands of migrants moving to the state. The railroad hosted extensive advertising campaigns in eastern states and abroad in order to direct immigration to the plains of illinois. The company woudl even send agents abroad to recruit and would then have agents in Quebec and New York to meet the immigrants who were planning to go to its lands.
Notes
:
:
:
| >
> | The Illinois Central sought out immigrants in order to sell its land and generate funds. In the decade of the 1860s, the population of Illinois increased more than that of any other state in the Union, with thousands of migrants moving to the state. The railroad hosted extensive advertising campaigns in eastern states and abroad in order to direct immigration to the plains of Illinois. The company would even send agents abroad to recruit and would then have agents in Quebec and New York to meet the immigrants who were planning to go to its lands. | | | | |
<
< | Although the Illinois Central succeeded in maintaining a good reputation with the people of Illinois, and remained the most popular railroad in the state, it did not escape the bitter criticism of the 1870s. Like other railroads, it was swept up in the anger of the public that had become disillusioned, no longer viewing the railroads as a path to the future but rather as a corrupt and parasitic power.
Notes
:
| >
> | Although the Illinois Central succeeded in maintaining a good reputation with the people of Illinois and remained the most popular railroad in the state, it did not escape the bitter criticism of the 1870s. Like other railroads, it was swept up in the anger of the public that had become disillusioned, no longer viewing the railroads as a path to the future but rather as a corrupt and parasitic power. | | | The Pacific Railroad | |
>
> | Where the Illinois Central was built at the peak of optimism regarding the railroads, the Pacific railroad was one of the last to receive public grants, coming under a cloak of skepticism from the time it obtained the grant in 1862. Yet, talk of a Pacific railroad began even with the construction of the first railroads in the 1830s, a time when the proposals for 3,000 miles of track were not truly considered by the government of a country in possession of only 229 miles of track altogether.
Notes
:
| | | | |
>
> | In 1844, Asa Whitney presented Congress with his first petition for a Pacific railroad. In January of 1845, he petitioned the House for public lands to build a railroad from Lake Michigan, through the Rocky Mountains, to the Oregon Territory and on the shores of the Pacific Ocean. His pleas addressed a wide range of benefits that he believed the railroad would bring, from relieving "our cities from a vast amount of misery, vice, crime and taxation" to taking the poor unfortunates to a land "where they will be compelled to labor for a subsistence, and as they will soon find themselves...surrounded with comfort and plenty, the reward of their own toil." He lobbied incessantly for the rest of the decade but each of his petitions failed.
Efforts to build a Pacific Railroad continued and failed throughout the 1850s, either because of a lack of the necessary technology or because the parties involved could not agree on whether government aid was essential, or which of the many potential routes to build.
Three steps were necessary before an actual plan for a Pacific railroad could be seriously considered -- first a survey through the Rocky Mountains and the western terrains, second the "removal of the intruded Indians who had been concentrated along the eastern frontier" and third the creation of territories through which to project the railroad. This required coordinated efforts but the support for the Pacific railroad was not united.
In 1861, the political reasons for funding the railroad were increasing. The Pacific Coast states were loyal to the Union but isolated, and the trouble with Native Americans was increasing at a time when troops were needed elsewhere. Therefore, Congressmen saw the advantage in binding California to the Union and enabling the army to support the frontier outposts through a railroad line.
By 1862, the country possessed 32,120 miles of track, as well as the necessary technology to pursue this project. Yet, there were still concerns -- the longest road in existence was the Illinois Central which was only 700 miles of track, and the terrain of the Pacific railroad would traverse the western mountains and desserts. In July of 1862, Congress enacted the bill to grant the Pacific railroad its land. But by this time, the belief was that constructing the transcontinental road would taint someone's hands, it was just not clear whose.
So, the project began under suspicion. The Civil War was not going well for the North with costs and casualties mounting. The Public was disillusioned with the waste and corruption of army contractors and other parasites feeding on the government. The visionaries who were lining up since the 1830s were gone, and in their place stood the "tough, practical, persistent" promoters, who were hardly disinterested patriots.
Notes
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
,:
:
| | |
| | | | |
>
> |
| | |
| META FILEATTACHMENT | attachment="PacificRailwayActof1862.pdf" attr="" comment="Fn14 - Pacific Railway Act of 1862" date="1524700665" name="PacificRailwayActof1862.pdf" path="PacificRailwayActof1862.pdf" size="3483376" stream="PacificRailwayActof1862.pdf" user="Main.PaulineAbijaoude" version="1" |
|---|
| META FILEATTACHMENT | attachment="The_Congressional_Globe_2095.pdf" attr="" comment="Fn 17 - The Congressional Globe, 2095" date="1524700701" name="The_Congressional_Globe_2095.pdf" path="The Congressional Globe 2095.pdf" size="621130" stream="The Congressional Globe 2095.pdf" user="Main.PaulineAbijaoude" version="1" |
|---|
| |
>
> |
| META FILEATTACHMENT | attachment="U.S._Stat_at_Large,_XII_.pdf" attr="" comment="Fn 45" date="1524721800" name="U.S._Stat_at_Large,_XII_.pdf" path="U.S. Stat at Large, XII .pdf" size="960276" stream="U.S. Stat at Large, XII .pdf" user="Main.PaulineAbijaoude" version="1" |
|---|
| META FILEATTACHMENT | attachment="Congressional_Globe_218.pdf" attr="" comment="Fn 37" date="1524721853" name="Congressional_Globe_218.pdf" path="Congressional Globe 218.pdf" size="766451" stream="Congressional Globe 218.pdf" user="Main.PaulineAbijaoude" version="1" |
|---|
|
|