DAILY TECH E-LETTER | ARCHIVES
SEARCH: Search Options
Technology Home
Washtech
Tech Policy
Government IT
Markets
Columnists
Personal Tech
Special Reports
Jobs
Navigate washingtonpost.com
Advertisement
Techway Magazine
Current Issue
Fast 50 | Techfast
Subscribe
Company Postings
Get Quotes
Tech Almanac

Webcasters Get Royalty Reprieve

Advertisement

_____TechNews.com Archive_____
Small Webcasters Cut Deal on Royalties (TechNews.com, Oct 7, 2002)
Deal Imminent on Web Radio Royalties (TechNews.com, Oct 1, 2002)
A Chorus of Angry Piggies (The Washington Post, Aug 10, 2002)
Webcast Royalty Proposal Draws Fire From All Sides (TechNews.com, Aug 8, 2002)
Curtain Call for Webcasts? (The Washington Post, Jun 21, 2002)
Copyfight Renewal (The Washington Post, Jun 7, 2002)
They're Not Treating Webcasters Like Royalty (The Washington Post, May 26, 2002)
Webcast Royalty Plan Rejected (Washtech, May 21, 2002)
_____Digital Rights_____
Justices Hear Challenge to Copyright Law (The Washington Post, Oct 10, 2002)
Hollywood's Demands Could Cripple Consumer Technology, Panelists Say (Associated Press, Oct 15, 2002)
Microsoft Easing Up On DVD Restrictions (The Washington Post, Oct 9, 2002)
More Stories
_____OnPolitics_____
Today's Political News
Elections 2002 Coverage
Daily E-mail Updates
_____TechNews.com_____
Sign-up for the weekly tech policy e-letter (Delivered every Monday).
E-Mail This Article
Printer-Friendly Version
Subscribe to print edition
By Robert MacMillan and David McGuire
washingtonpost.com Staff Writers
Saturday, October 19, 2002; 3:46 PM

Small Web broadcasters won't pay the price for Congress's failure to pass legislation that relieves them from thousands of dollars in back payments to the recording industry, said the group that collects performance royalties for copyright owners.

SoundExchange, which collects royalties for musicians, songwriters and the corporations that own many music copyrights, said late Friday that it would ask for webcasters to make $500 minimum payments after the Senate adjourned without voting on a bill that would reduce the royalty payments smaller webcasters owe back to 1998.

"Given the unfortunate fact that a lone senator apparently held up the small webcasters' bill, we felt it appropriate to offer this proposal," said SoundExchange Executive Director John Simson in a written statement about the 11th-hour deal. "We hope that this unexpected development will be soon resolved by the Senate."

Record companies on Sunday were expected to begin collecting four years of back royalties from all Web radio stations under rates established earlier this year by the U.S. Copyright Office, part of the Library of Congress.

Sen. Jesse Helms (R-N.C.) kept the Senate from voting on the bill before the Sunday deadline because of objections from religious Internet radio stations in North Carolina, sources close to the webcasting deal said.

"My immediate reaction is encouragement that they seem to really want to find some remedy," said Kevin Shively, director of interactive media at Internet radio station Beethoven.com, a mid-sized classical music webcasting service with 65,000 to 70,000 listeners. But Shively withheld any endorsement of the SoundExchange offer, saying he is still analyzing its terms.

Many small Web radio station owners say their fate rests in the hands of the recording industry after senators delayed further action on the bill until after the mid-term elections.

Under the bill, negotiated by a coalition of small Webcasters and the Recording Industry Association of America (RIAA), lower royalties would be applied to webcasters with less than $1.25 million in annual revenues. Webcasters above that level would be still be required to pay royalties under the plan established by the Copyright Office, under which Internet radio stations would pay a royalty rate of .07 cents per song, per listener.

Webcasters argued that the .07-cent figure was too high, while the RIAA said it was too low. Negotiations then began after some members of Congress said they would try to delay the royalty rate structure for another six months unless a compromise was reached.

The legislation, which passed the House of Representatives earlier this month, would require small webcasters to pay either 8 percent of revenues or 5 percent of expenses to cover webcasts dating back to 1998, when the Digital Millennium Copyright Act that mandated the royalty payments for Internet broadcasts became law.

The bill also would require webcasters to pay as much as 12 percent of their revenues, or up to 7 percent of their expenses, for future royalty payments. The actual rate varies based on the size of the webcaster. Webcasters would pay into a fund that would be distributed among copyright holders.


TechNews.com Home

© 2002 TechNews.com

Techway Events: Techfast Live | Fast 50
Company Postings: Quick Quotes | Tech Almanac
About TechNews.com | Advertising | Contact TechNews.com | Privacy
My Profile | Reprints | Subscribe to print edition | Syndication