![]() |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|||
![]() |
|||
![]() |
|
![]() |
Long-awaited privacy bill unveiledInitial reaction is mixed
WASHINGTON (Reuters) -- Several U.S. lawmakers introduced a long-awaited privacy bill Wednesday that would allow U.S. businesses to share information about customers who have not explicitly forbidden them to do so. More than a year in the making, the privacy bill unveiled in the House of Representatives differs from a competing bill making its way through the Senate that would require businesses to get consumers' explicit permission before sharing sensitive information such as income level, religious affiliation or political interests. U.S. Rep. Cliff Stearns' bill would instead leave companies free to share customer profiles unless customers specifically forbade them. The bill would cover transactions both on the Internet and in the "offline" world, and would override state laws that place more restrictions on commercial use of personal information. Sponsors said the bill would establish basic privacy protections for consumers while minimizing the impact on business. Stearns, a Florida Republican whose consumer-protection subcommittee held six hearings on privacy last year, said the free flow of consumer data has been a cornerstone of the modern information-based economy. "The underlying principle that anchors this bill is, 'do no harm,' " he said. Consumers would have no right to sue if their privacy was violated. Enforcement would be left in the hands of the Federal Trade Commission, which usually does not impose fines on a first offense. Companies submitting to a self-regulatory privacy regime such as TRUSTe or BBBonline would enjoy protection from FTC actions. Attracting attentionWhile lawmakers have introduced dozens of privacy bills in the House since the beginning of last year, none has attracted as much support as Stearns' measure. The bill has lined up 22 co-sponsors from both sides of the aisle, among them Rep. Billy Tauzin, the Louisiana Republican who chairs the House Energy and Commerce Committee. Rep. Rick Boucher, a Virginia Democrat, said businesses would be free to set more restrictive privacy practices on their own as a way to market themselves. "I'll predict a much greater level of Internet usage with these privacy policies in place," Boucher said. Initial reaction to the bill was mixed. A group of business leaders from high-tech firms said the bill struck the right balance between consumers and businesses, while the U.S. Chamber of Commerce said it was not needed because businesses could handle privacy concerns on their own. Privacy advocates said the bill was a step backward, especially by not providing extra protection for sensitive information. "Americans care about sensitive information. This bill does not address those issues," said Ari Schwartz, a senior policy analyst at the Center for Democracy and Technology. Copyright 2002 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||
![]() | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
RELATED STORIES:
House panel OKs stiffer cybercrime penalties
May 8, 2002 EPIC takes aim at legislation affecting privacy May 7, 2002 Hackers say holes exposed retail data May 8, 2002 Firms urged to uphold privacy or face legal woes May 3, 2002 Net firms object to Senate privacy bill April 26, 2002 Senate measure embraces opt-in privacy standard April 25, 2002 CFP: Should privacy technologies be built in? April 23, 2002 ISPs oppose Minnesota Web privacy bill April 22, 2002 Web consortium backs P3P privacy standard April 18, 2002 UK eyeing Internet privacy protections for workers April 16, 2002 RELATED SITES: Note: Pages will open in a new browser window
External sites are not endorsed by CNN Interactive.
TECHNOLOGY TOP STORIES:
Genetics may help anthrax mystery 'Operation Web Sweep' targets child porn Satellite spots monster iceberg breaking away Video revolution for text messages IBM, startup launch massive gaming 'grid' (More) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
Back to the top | ![]() |
© 2002 Cable News Network LP, LLLP.
An AOL Time Warner Company. All Rights Reserved. Terms under which this service is provided to you. Read our privacy guidelines. Contact us. |