OSDN | Our Network | Newsletters | Advertise | Shop     X 
Welcome to Slashdot News Technology Television GNU is Not Unix Patents
 faq
 code
 awards
 journals
 subscribe
 older stuff
 rob's page
 preferences
 submit story
 advertising
 supporters
 past polls
 topics
 about
 bugs
 jobs
 hof

Sections
apache
Jul 23

apple
Aug 3
(1 recent)

articles
Aug 5
(27 recent)

askslashdot
Aug 5
(11 recent)

books
Aug 2

bsd
Aug 3
(1 recent)

developers
Aug 5
(4 recent)

features
Jul 18

interviews
Aug 5
(1 recent)

radio
Jun 29

science
Aug 4
(6 recent)

yro
Aug 5
(5 recent)

Governmental ID System in Japan
PrivacyPosted by timothy on Monday August 05, @08:27AM
from the hello-citizen dept.
Kaan writes: "Japan just launched a mandatory, nationwide ID system whereby every citizen is assigned an 11-digit identification number. The database stores personal data (name, address, date of birth, gender, possibly more data) for each person. At least five municipalities are refusing to join the system, which accounts for ~4 million of the 127 million total. While some Japanese folks are refusing to cooperate, most are going along with it. Is this the beginning of the end of privacy in Japan? How much longer until we see something like that in the U.S.?"

 

 
Slashdot Login
Nickname:

Password:

[ Create a new account ]

Related Links
· mandatory, nationwide ID system
· More on Privacy
· Also by timothy

Your Rights Online
· SEC Institutes Proceedings Against Rodona Garst
· Governmental ID System in Japan
· All We Want Is Whatever's On Your Machine
· More MS EULA Fun
· 80% Of Incoming E-mail At Hotmail Is Spam
· Interview with DMCA-challenger
· HP Backs Off DMCA Threat
· VeriSign and Other Registry Giants Blast ICANN
· U.S. Computer Security Advisor Encourages Hackers
· South African Gov And ECT Bill

See 4-D Space With 3-D Glasses | What is Holding SAP-DB Back?  >
Governmental ID System in Japan | Log in/Create an Account | Top | 516 comments | Search Discussion
Threshold:
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
(1) | 2 | 3 (Slashdot Overload: CommentLimit 50)
SS# (Score:5, Insightful)
by DrStrange on Monday August 05, @08:29AM (#4011139)
(User #72008 Info)
Ahhh, don't we have something like that already known as a social security number?
[ Reply to This | Parent ]
  • Re:SS# by zapfie (Score:1) Monday August 05, @08:32AM
    • Re:SS# by Lars T. (Score:2) Monday August 05, @08:38AM
    • Re:SS# by Ryosen (Score:1) Monday August 05, @08:40AM
      • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
    • Re:SS# by TibbonZero (Score:1) Monday August 05, @08:47AM
      • Re:SS# by zapfie (Score:1) Monday August 05, @09:19AM
        • Re:SS# by CokeBear (Score:2) Monday August 05, @09:38AM
        • Re:SS# by TibbonZero (Score:2) Monday August 05, @12:06PM
    • Re:SS# by Heywood Yabuzof (Score:1) Monday August 05, @09:10AM
    • OT: Zapf? by MCZapf (Score:1) Monday August 05, @01:17PM
  • ...and in Canada... by mhore (Score:1) Monday August 05, @08:32AM
  • Re:SS# by bzcpcfj (Score:3) Monday August 05, @08:32AM
    • Re:SS# by JPriest (Score:1) Monday August 05, @08:36AM
    • Actually.... by Angry White Guy (Score:2) Monday August 05, @08:38AM
      • Re:Actually.... by Angry White Guy (Score:1) Monday August 05, @08:59AM
      • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
    • Re:SS# (Score:5, Insightful)
      by Kefaa on Monday August 05, @08:47AM (#4011241)
      (User #76147 Info)
      "Technically, no, because you don't have to have a social security number"

      No longer true. When my children were born, a SSN form was required for them prior to leaving the hospital. The days of an "optional" SSN are gone.
      [ Reply to This | Parent ]
      • Re:SS# by sphealey (Score:2) Monday August 05, @09:18AM
        • Re:SS# by Kid Zero (Score:1) Monday August 05, @11:07AM
          • Re:SS# by John Jorsett (Score:2) Monday August 05, @11:43AM
          • 2 replies beneath your current threshold.
        • Re:SS# by Punk Walrus (Score:1) Monday August 05, @11:51AM
        • Re:SS# by Jahf (Score:2) Monday August 05, @12:08PM
          • Re:SS# by matguy (Score:1) Monday August 05, @01:09PM
            • Re:SS# by Jobe_br (Score:1) Monday August 05, @02:35PM
            • Re:SS# by Anonymous Cow herd (Score:1) Monday August 05, @04:59PM
      • Re:SS# (Score:4, Informative)
        by shani (shaneNO@SPAMtime-travellers.org) on Monday August 05, @09:18AM (#4011378)
        (User #1674 Info | http://www.time-travellers.org)
        There's no law requiring children be born in a hospital. It just seems that way, in America at least. (In Holland being pregnant isn't a disease, so most women give birth at home.)

        You do need to have a SSN for your children in order to claim them as dependents on your taxes. When this change was introduced, there ended up being a lot less children, meaning a lot of people where cheating on their taxes.
        [ Reply to This | Parent ]
        • Re:SS# by tomstdenis (Score:2) Monday August 05, @09:28AM
          • Re:SS# by cduffy (Score:2) Monday August 05, @10:01AM
            • Re:SS# by Jobe_br (Score:1) Monday August 05, @02:16PM
          • Re:SS# by njdj (Score:1) Monday August 05, @12:47PM
          • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
        • Re:SS# by Kefaa (Score:2) Monday August 05, @10:59AM
        • Re:SS# by giminy (Score:2) Monday August 05, @01:17PM
          • Re:SS# by liquidice5 (Score:1) Monday August 05, @01:34PM
          • Re:SS# by lordgert (Score:1) Monday August 05, @01:37PM
          • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
      • Re:SS# by bigpat (Score:2) Monday August 05, @10:24AM
      • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
    • Re:SS# by TRACK-YOUR-POSITION (Score:2) Monday August 05, @09:11AM
    • Re:SS# (Score:4, Insightful)
      by Zathrus on Monday August 05, @09:30AM (#4011437)
      (User #232140 Info | http://slashdot.org/)
      Technically, no, because you don't have to have a social security number.

      If you're a US Citizen you do, ever since 1987 I believe.

      The SSN is a national ID system. Period. Anyone believing differently is fooling themselves. You have to present it to work (because of that 15% that goes *poof* out of your paycheck), you file it with your taxes, you have to give it for most bank accounts, for mortgage loans, heck, for most financial data (auto loans, credit cards, etc). Most medical plans use your SSN as your ID (or the SSN of the primary cardholder, followed by -# for others).

      Don't think living in an apartment means your SSN isn't on file. Most likely the apartment complex wanted to run a credit check on you to lower their risk of a bad rentor. That involved getting your SSN because your SSN is the most reliable way of uniquely identifying you in the credit bureau systems -- I know, I wrote algorithms to try and do matches without the SSN. They weren't nearly as accurate (I think the best we got to was 3 false positives out of 11 million).

      Anyone who's had their SSN stolen and used for identity theft can tell you just how much of a nightmare that creates. And this is largely because the SSN has evolved into a national ID without it ever having been designed as one. You can't just reel off a 9 digit number and use it as a SSN (there are check digits), but if I know your SSN then I can pass it off as my own without any additional checks.
      [ Reply to This | Parent ]
      • Re:SS# by Ark42 (Score:1) Monday August 05, @09:40AM
        • Re:SS# by Zathrus (Score:1) Monday August 05, @09:59AM
          • Re:SS# by lightcycler (Score:1) Monday August 05, @12:27PM
            • Re:SS# by BrianH (Score:2) Monday August 05, @01:01PM
              • Re:SS# by Zathrus (Score:1) Monday August 05, @01:59PM
              • Re:SS# by ptbarnett (Score:1) Monday August 05, @04:33PM
              • OT: Taxes by Zathrus (Score:1) Monday August 05, @02:06PM
                • Re:OT: Taxes by Jobe_br (Score:1) Monday August 05, @02:50PM
                  • Re:OT: Taxes by avdp (Score:2) Monday August 05, @04:27PM
                    • Re:OT: Taxes by avdp (Score:2) Monday August 05, @04:31PM
                    • Re:OT: Taxes by Zathrus (Score:1) Monday August 05, @04:51PM
              • Re:SS# (Score:5, Funny)
                by ThereIsNoSporkNeo on Monday August 05, @09:42AM (#4011504)
                (User #587688 Info)
                "If you're a US Citizen you do, ever since 1987 I believe."

                You sure of that date? I could've sworn it was closer to 1984...
                [ Reply to This | Parent ]
              • Re:SS# by King_TJ (Score:3) Monday August 05, @12:44PM
                • Re:SS# by hyperturbopete (Score:2) Monday August 05, @01:30PM
                • Re:SS# by GrandCow (Score:2) Monday August 05, @01:48PM
              • 2 replies beneath your current threshold.
            • Re:SS# by mustangsal (Score:1) Monday August 05, @10:46AM
          • Re:SS# by CptSkydrop (Score:1) Monday August 05, @08:33AM
            • Re:SS# by Neon Spiral Injector (Score:2) Monday August 05, @09:15AM
              • Re:SS# by hrieke (Score:2) Monday August 05, @10:58AM
              • Re:SS# by lightcycler (Score:1) Monday August 05, @12:32PM
            • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
          • Re:SS# by Angry White Guy (Score:1) Monday August 05, @08:34AM
              Re:SS# (Score:5, Funny)
              by Safety Cap on Monday August 05, @08:38AM (#4011193)
              (User #253500 Info | http://www.milk.com/...urity_clearance.html | Last Journal: Monday August 05, @12:14PM)
              Thank god the government hasn't figured out the elusive secrets of table joins.
              Shh! Now they'll know about the secret (+) code!! Who knows what they will do with their newfound power?!
              [ Reply to This | Parent ]
              • Re:SS# by Angry White Guy (Score:1) Monday August 05, @08:49AM
                • Re:SS# by Safety Cap (Score:2) Monday August 05, @12:00PM
              • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
            • Re:SS# by avdp (Score:3) Monday August 05, @08:58AM
              • Re:SS# by Heywood Yabuzof (Score:1) Monday August 05, @09:13AM
              • Re:SS# by Angry White Guy (Score:1) Monday August 05, @09:16AM
                • Re:SS# by boomer_rehfield (Score:1) Monday August 05, @10:11AM
                • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
              • Re:SS# by whovian (Score:1) Monday August 05, @09:28AM
                • Re:SS# by cduffy (Score:1) Monday August 05, @10:15AM
              • Re:SS# by someone247356 (Score:1) Monday August 05, @09:56AM
                • Re:SS# by bellings (Score:2) Monday August 05, @10:59AM
                  • Re:SS# by MCZapf (Score:1) Monday August 05, @12:50PM
                  • Re:SS# by someone247356 (Score:1) Monday August 05, @12:56PM
                • Re:SS# by avdp (Score:2) Monday August 05, @04:56PM
            • IRS has figured out table joins. by peter303 (Score:2) Monday August 05, @09:16AM
            • Re:SS# by crevette (Score:1) Monday August 05, @09:51AM
            • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
          • Re:SS# by Koyaanisqatsi (Score:2) Monday August 05, @08:34AM
          • Re:SS# (Score:5, Funny)
            by bellings on Monday August 05, @08:37AM (#4011187)
            (User #137948 Info)
            Well, it's totally different than a social security number! For example, my social security number is only 9 digits long, not 11.

            And, in the United States, the social security number is never used for identification. You're only legally required to use one if you want a job, use a bank, get a loan, use a credit card, own any shares in a company (including common stock), get an identification card, go to a public school, or pay taxes.

            And, many private services, including insurance, video rental cards, university identification cards, and health services usually demand a SS number, although those can not legally demand one, except in a bunch of special cases which no human on earth can enumerate.

            So, see? They're not at all the same.
            [ Reply to This | Parent ]
            • Re:SS# by vmaaw224 (Score:1) Monday August 05, @09:29AM
            • Re:SS# (Score:4, Informative)
              by Raul654 on Monday August 05, @09:32AM (#4011448)
              (User #453029 Info)
              IANAL (but I slept at a holiday inn last night)...
                If I'm not mistaken, you don't even have to give it out in those sitations, do you? I thought that the only reason you had to give it out was for gov't and social security related items. I did a quick google search and turned up this [faqs.org] little gem.
              [ Reply to This | Parent ]
              • Re:SS# by Ioldanach (Score:3) Monday August 05, @10:22AM
              • Re:SS# by m0rph3us0 (Score:1) Monday August 05, @03:37PM
            • Re:SS# by gtaluvit (Score:1) Monday August 05, @10:47AM
            • Re:SS# by Lee164 (Score:1) Monday August 05, @11:50AM
              • Re:SS# by thopkins (Score:1) Monday August 05, @12:14PM
              • Re:SS# by NMerriam (Score:2) Monday August 05, @01:58PM
            • Re:SS# by wmspringer (Score:1) Monday August 05, @12:37PM
              • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
            • SS# & Utilities by sjbe (Score:2) Monday August 05, @02:48PM
            • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
          • SS#: Not a National ID by Thenomain (Score:1) Monday August 05, @09:02AM
          • Re:SS# by whodisbe (Score:1) Monday August 05, @09:42AM
          • social security in Japan by ryochiji (Score:2) Monday August 05, @11:49AM
          • Re:SS# by nafmo (Score:1) Monday August 05, @09:23AM
          • Re:SS# by kiwimate (Score:2) Monday August 05, @09:30AM
            • Re:SS# by boomer_rehfield (Score:1) Monday August 05, @10:26AM
              • Re:SS# by BrianH (Score:2) Monday August 05, @01:19PM
          • Re:SS# by someone247356 (Score:2) Monday August 05, @10:43AM
          • Re:SS# by Yazeran (Score:1) Monday August 05, @11:50AM
          • 9 replies beneath your current threshold.
          Sounds like what we have.... (Score:3, Insightful)
          by truesaer on Monday August 05, @08:32AM (#4011148)
          (User #135079 Info | http://slashdot.org/)
          Except ours is only nine digits, and is called a social security number. My number is recorded on everything from housing to loans to taxes to investments to my educational records. And although there isn't a central database, we all know how much you can find on the internet for a small fee.
          [ Reply to This | Parent ]
          Big Brother is not only watching you... (Score:1)
          by dbaigrie on Monday August 05, @08:32AM (#4011152)
          (User #219410 Info)
          Big Brother is not only watching you but they are telling you they are and you have no choice....

          Not good. :-(
          [ Reply to This | Parent ]
          Not As Big A Problem As You May Think (Score:4, Insightful)
          by Self Bias Resistor (zerosignal@SpamBu ... .subdimension.com) on Monday August 05, @08:33AM (#4011156)
          (User #136938 Info | http://slashdot.org/)

          This sort of thing has been in place in many countries for quite some time. In Sweden, for example, every resident has a "personnummer" (personal number) that you use for identification purposes. It consists of your birthdate followed by another four-digit number. And the US has their Social Security number.

          So what I'm interested in is, what's the problem?

          [ Reply to This | Parent ]
          Hurray for us! (Score:1)
          by Mononoke on Monday August 05, @08:33AM (#4011157)
          (User #88668 Info | http://slashdot.org/)
          I'd much rather live in a nation of Anonymous Cowards, where you don't have to be responsible for your actions.

          Tell me, how does Japan's ID plan affect their privacy any more than the US social security number system affect ours (in the US)?

          [ Reply to This | Parent ]
          Too much concern? (Score:1)
          by TamMan2000 on Monday August 05, @08:34AM (#4011161)
          (User #578899 Info)
          I am as much for privacy as the next guy, but is this really that big of a deal?

          We all have a 9 digit social security number in the states; and if you want to be able to function in society you have some form of official state ID (Drivers licence, or plain ID card) which has your address, date of birth, and so on, as well as your SSN (associated in the database, if not explicity printed on the card).

          Or I could be completely wrong...
          [ Reply to This | Parent ]
          No, we won't (Score:1, Redundant)
          by Arcturax on Monday August 05, @08:34AM (#4011162)
          (User #454188 Info)
          We only have a 9 digit number instead...

          Seriously though, why all the fuss about a national ID? We have it at the State level already and you don't see people screaming big brother about that. Here in Ohio, we have drivers licenses but you can also get a "State ID" card which looks like it only it says "non driver" if for some reason you can't drive (say, due to age).

          Granted its just yet another card I'll have to carry about with me, unless maybe they strike a deal with states to combine the ID with drivers licenses as well as using them as just standard ID's (for non drivers).
          [ Reply to This | Parent ]
          Watch and Learn (Score:1)
          by gerf on Monday August 05, @08:34AM (#4011166)
          (User #532474 Info | Last Journal: Monday July 29, @09:50AM)
          This should be a very good thing to watch, to see if rights are violated, if it really does help people, and does everything it is designed to do. Also, who's gonna be the first to hack that DB? It's only a matter of time, you know..
          [ Reply to This | Parent ]
          • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
          So? (Score:1)
          by Zabu on Monday August 05, @08:35AM (#4011171)
          (User #589690 Info)
          Governments already have information on you, and they use your name to get to it.
          Same system, but the number is now in place of your name. Doesn't seem like a problem to me.
          [ Reply to This | Parent ]
          Cool... (Score:5, Funny)
          by Spackler on Monday August 05, @08:36AM (#4011178)
          (User #223562 Info)
          Cool, Ashcroft got Japan to run his Beta Testing for him.
          [ Reply to This | Parent ]
          • Re:Cool... by thopkins (Score:1) Monday August 05, @12:38PM
          • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
          We already have one. (Score:1)
          by paiute on Monday August 05, @08:36AM (#4011180)
          (User #550198 Info)
          We already have such a number: your SSN. Although it isn't "supposed" to be such, it is the de facto national ID number. And when some shmuck in SoCal declared bankruptcy using mine, it would have been most convenient for the magistrate there to be able to look the number up in a dbase and say, "Well, Mr. Huang, are you sure you are a 40 something white male living on the East Coast?"

          I know, I hate the idea of gummint having a file on me, but the big credit agencies have one already.

          I'd rather everyone get their own lifelong email address and URL at birth. Now that would be handy.
          [ Reply to This | Parent ]
          Continental Europe had had this for ages... (Score:4, Funny)
          by stud9920 (.slashdot. .at. .majoros.net.) on Monday August 05, @08:37AM (#4011182)
          (User #236753 Info | http://www.majoros.net/ | Last Journal: Thursday September 06, @06:35AM)
          ...and see what a dictature they live in ! Now not only does the state know people's gender, they know people's AGE too ! This is ludacris ! Before you'll know, they will keep people's ADRESS too ! Ludacris !
          [ Reply to This | Parent ]
          I've seen it in movies ... (Score:1)
          by Spectre (brian_dozier@yahoo.com) on Monday August 05, @08:39AM (#4011194)
          (User #1685 Info)
          *thick german accent* "Papers?"

          You know, somebody once said that a rational argument is over as soon as somebody mentions nazis ... in this case, however, I think it is the governments who brought them to mind, not me.
          [ Reply to This | Parent ]
          What do you mean "when"? (Score:2, Informative)
          by Gryffin on Monday August 05, @08:39AM (#4011197)
          (User #86893 Info | http://slashdot.org/)

          "How much longer until we see something like that in the U.S.?"

          What do you mean, "when"? It's called the Social Security Number, or more accurately these days, "Taxpayer Identification Number". And besides just name, address, date of birth and gender, it's tied to your employment history (in governemnt databases), credit history, medical history, and tons more (in "private" databases).

          [ Reply to This | Parent ]
          • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
          Thats why I'm a Libertarian (Score:5, Interesting)
          by SuperCal on Monday August 05, @08:40AM (#4011200)
          (User #549671 Info | http://slashdot.org/)
          I know that it sounds like a troll, but seriously this is the kind of thing that made me a Libertarian. My towns congressmen , both Dem. and Rep, have all pledged to fight government invasion of privacy, but they keep voteing us closer to this kind of thing.
          [ Reply to This | Parent ]
          • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
          Sounds like the danish system. (Score:5, Informative)
          by Hektor_Troy on Monday August 05, @08:41AM (#4011203)
          (User #262592 Info | http://fair-use.dk/)
          Our CPR (Central Person Registry) stores your CPR-number. Mine looks like this:

          130477-1235 (no, this is not my real CPR-number)

          This indicates that my birthdate is the 13th day of the 04th month of the 77th year.

          1235 is the "checksum" and gender-marker; even numbers for women, uneven for men. I think they use X for women and Y for men without a permanet citizen ship (refugees and the like).

          Also, the entire number has to pass some kind of test, but I can't remember how it's used.

          The CPR also has the current address of each person along with an opt out feature for commercial mail targeted at you, which is nice, because all companies in Denmark have to comply by that setting, but they only have access to the address through CPR.

          You can read a lot more about the system here [www.cpr.dk].

          I am a proponent of personal privacy, and I don't have a problem with this system - probably because I can't think of a single intrusion into my privacy caused by it.

          I think it comes down to "trust", and so far I haven't had a reason not to trust the CPR.
          [ Reply to This | Parent ]
          We have renamed your child 23435387029 (Score:1)
          by Mr.roboto on Monday August 05, @08:41AM (#4011205)
          (User #112555 Info | http://www.geocities.com/triodes12ax7/)
          It's just easier this way.
          [ Reply to This | Parent ]
          This is good (Score:5, Interesting)
          by dybdahl (lbdNO@SPAMdybdahl.dk) on Monday August 05, @08:42AM (#4011210)
          (User #80720 Info | http://www.dybdahl.dk)
          Denmark has had this since the 1970's, which is also the reason why the Danish population is very popular amongst researchers. All health care information is available through this central computer system, and this makes researchers able to find correlations quickly. All tax information is provided this way, too. You cannot open a bank account without telling your 10-digit identification number, which the bank will use to report to the state.

          It is extremely convenient - when moving, you only have to tell it once, and then all banks, insurance companies, the army (if you are reserve), your doctor etc. know your new address.

          There are some security concerns and there is a very strict legislation about how to handle this system, but the economical benefits are huge and it does benefit society a lot.

          Having lived in both in Denmark where everybody has an ID-number (but no ID-cards), and in Germany, where everybody has an ID-card (but no ID-number), I clearly prefer the Danish system.

          Dybdahl.
          [ Reply to This | Parent ]
          Most countries... (Score:2, Insightful)
          by Kobal on Monday August 05, @08:43AM (#4011212)
          (User #597997 Info)
          ...already have identification numbers, be they for ID cards, social security or both. In most cases, the only centralized information is in the number itself, linked to the name. I haven't heard of any widespread falsification through hacking. Of course, if the number itself isn't directly based on the info, which is instead stored in a database, things could get awry... Yet, it's weird people would complain about getting such a unique id number when database cross-referencing is already common practice.
          [ Reply to This | Parent ]
          They'll need more than 11 #'s! (Score:5, Funny)
          by SoSueMe on Monday August 05, @08:43AM (#4011214)
          (User #263478 Info)
          From the article:
          "the new ID numbers -- for each of Japan's 126 million citizens...."
          Three paragraphs later:
          "About four million of Japan's 127 million people...."
          At that rate of population explosion, how long till they run out of number combos?
          [ Reply to This | Parent ]
          privacy in japan? (Score:2, Insightful)
          by small_box_of_stuff on Monday August 05, @08:45AM (#4011226)
          (User #258902 Info)
          have any of you ever been to japan? the idea of privacy is silly. they never had any, what would they be giving away exactly?

          [ Reply to This | Parent ]
          Get used to it (Score:5, Interesting)
          by bildstorm (peter.buchyNO@SPAMshh.fi) on Monday August 05, @08:46AM (#4011228)
          (User #129924 Info | http://cyphertube.com/ | Last Journal: Sunday August 04, @04:46PM)

          I actually think this is a good idea.

          People in the U.S. gripe about identity theft left and right. Part of the reason it's so easy to perform identity theft is that while a social security number is tied to a person, it's only tied by the fact it was assigned. Remember, we recycle these stupid numbers.

          I have a Finnish ID number as well, since I lived there for quite some time. That one actually makes sense. It's my birthday in DDMMYY form, plus three digits and a letter. That identifies where I was born, when I was born, and my gender. It's not exactly easy to steal from people, since it really is tied to the person, not simply assigned.

          Technically in Finland, you don't have to give out the number, but in reality you use it for a number of things. The cool part is that they write down the last part (the three digits and letter) when checking credit cards, lessening credit card fraud. Anyone remember when they used to check stuff here in the U.S.?

          <example_id>040463-395F</example_id>

          [ Reply to This | Parent ]
          Take a look (Score:1)
          by PovRayMan (Heh) on Monday August 05, @08:46AM (#4011232)
          (User #31900 Info | http://www.povrayman.tk/)
          Go ahead. Take a look around.

          Look at all the different ways you are tagged to numbers.

          Social Security.
          Drivers License.
          Date of Birth.
          Bank Cards.
          Credit Cards.
          Phone Number.

          There are more, but I can't really think since I've been on a bender all weekend.

          It would be a lot nicer if just a single number could tie all these other numbers together...
          [ Reply to This | Parent ]
          • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
          Oh my god... (Score:2, Insightful)
          by MosesJones on Monday August 05, @08:46AM (#4011233)
          (User #55544 Info)
          The GOVERMENT WILL KNOW WHERE YOU LIVE!

          How scary is that, they know where you work, they know how much you earn, they know how old you are, they know your gender, they know how many kids you have, they know who your parents are.

          This is so scary, and even worse every few years they let you put a poxy "X" on a piece of paper to say you agree with it.

          This has to be the biggest non-story of the year, almost every country already does this. You pay taxes, the goverment knows who you are... avoiding taxes then you are a criminal.
          [ Reply to This | Parent ]
          Too much fuss (Score:5, Insightful)
          by Saib0t (saibot.hesperia-mud@org) on Monday August 05, @08:46AM (#4011235)
          (User #204692 Info | http://www.hesperia-mud.org/)
          There's way too much fuss over something very legitimate, IMHO.

          As a belgian citizen, I've been living with a mandatory national ID card for all my life (well, from age 12 anyway). This card holds my names, adress, name of wife and kids, a national ID number (birth date + some digits) and a picture. Is that national ID card an infringement on my privacy? NO!

          I use the card to identify with state services such as when I want a copy of an official document, when I go vote, etc.; when requested by the police, for banking purposes: I have to show my ID card before doing a withdrawal at the bank, to create a new bank account, ... But NOTHING besides that.

          Does my governement keep all this data in a database. Sure they do. What do they do with that? Most certainly nothing.

          I fail to understand how you all people see this as an end to privacy. It's your government after all, they're supposed to know who's living where, who voted (voting is mandatory here). There's no pretending you're someone else than you, because that ID card is mandatory and there's a picture of you on it. So you can't pose as someone else (and someone can't pose as you).

          Do you remember the story of that wife who kept being arrested because she shared the same name as a wanted criminal? That could never happen with a national ID card, because all she'd have to do was present it and be left alone.

          National ID cards are GOOD, not bad.

          [ Reply to This | Parent ]
          • Link by Saib0t (Score:2) Monday August 05, @08:54AM
          • Re:Too much fuss by Dave Bailey (Score:1) Monday August 05, @09:00AM
          • Re:Too much fuss by MtViewGuy (Score:2) Monday August 05, @09:17AM
          • Re:Too much fuss (Score:5, Insightful)
            by cduffy ({ten.pocmaps} {ta} {todhsals+yffudc}) on Monday August 05, @10:24AM (#4011718)
            (User #652 Info)
            I fail to understand how you all people see this as an end to privacy. It's your government after all, they're supposed to know who's living where, who voted (voting is mandatory here).

            Since when was it my government's job to know anything about me?

            My government's job is to offer services to the public -- law enforcement, fire protection, roads, public education, that sort of thing. Good government is the servant of the people, not their master. Anything which upsets this order is dangerous in the extreme.
            [ Reply to This | Parent ]
            • Re:Too much fuss by keefebert (Score:1) Monday August 05, @11:10AM
            • Re:Too much fuss (Score:5, Insightful)
              by Saib0t (saibot.hesperia-mud@org) on Monday August 05, @11:26AM (#4012121)
              (User #204692 Info | http://www.hesperia-mud.org/)
              Since when was it my government's job to know anything about me?

              My government's job is to offer services to the public -- law enforcement, fire protection, roads, public education, that sort of thing. Good government is the servant of the people, not their master. Anything which upsets this order is dangerous in the extreme.

              Examples of needs to know where and who you are:
              - You didn't pay your taxes and left the place you lived in. As a responsible citizen, you're supposed to. The government needs to know where you are.
              - You're elligible for a tax rebate: Where does the government send it to?
              - A criminal decided to kill you. He does but the governement doesn't know where you are.
              - A fire in the woods is coming near your house, you live in the basement of your hut in the forest, the fire brigade needs to know to warn you.
              - You just turned 100 (congratulations, by the way). You don't have to pay any taxes anymore, you weren't aware of that, but you receive a letter in the mail from the gov to inform you of that nice situation.
              - You kidnapped 7 girls, the FBI finds traces of your DNA on the location the rapts were made. Now they know where you (used to) live to start looking for clues as to where the girls are.
              The list goes on, there are plenty of cases where the government needs to know about you...

              The job of the government is to serve you, but to do that, the government needs to be aware of your existence and your whereabouts. If you don't trust your governement, maybe is it a sign that you need another one...

              [ Reply to This | Parent ]
          • ID numbers for collecting tax by seichert (Score:1) Monday August 05, @12:05PM
          • Re:Too much fuss by zurab (Score:1) Monday August 05, @03:24PM
          • 2 replies beneath your current threshold.
          I was going to get all worked up over this (Score:1)
          by Gravital.net on Monday August 05, @08:47AM (#4011236)
          (User #598281 Info | http://gravital.net/)
          But then I realized a simple credit report will give much more information than is available in the government database. And yes, while the credit bureaus may not be the government, the information is still out there. So what's the difference?
          [ Reply to This | Parent ]
          Poland (Score:1)
          by pmf on Monday August 05, @08:48AM (#4011246)
          (User #255410 Info | http://www.frasunek.com)
          We have such in Poland for over ten years. It's called PESEL and composed of 12 digits. 6 of them is birthdate, rest is sex and checksum (yes!).
          [ Reply to This | Parent ]
          • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
          Imagine that! (Score:1)
          by fisman on Monday August 05, @08:48AM (#4011250)
          (User #66079 Info)
          Most people have a N-digit identification number with everything from their home address to full details about what they bought over the last 5 years! Where I live we call it a "bank account number".

          There are many other such numbers known as "Membership Number" or similar all over the place and the one I find the best hidden is the one called "Full Names". Best we all run for the hills!

          I fail to see how this system in any way affects privacy. It is simply an attempt to streamline archaic systems.

          Now if they were protesting against it running on Microsoft Servers I would understand their concern!
          [ Reply to This | Parent ]
          What's wrong with a national ID? (Score:1)
          by Cyclone66 (cyclone66@hotmail.com) on Monday August 05, @08:49AM (#4011252)
          (User #217347 Info | http://slashdot.org/)
          It would make going to government offices much easier for one. It would reduce identity theft (which is becoming a very large problem in Canada). Your SIN or SSN (depending on country) is not your ID. It's not supposed to be used as an ID, but we have no other national ID number. There is a real need for an nagtional valid ID number. We already have drivrs license', passports, birth certificates and in Canada we have a medicare card. Each province runs its own system and they often don't communicate with eachother so none of these cards can be used to positivly identify you. That's why you need to show 2 or 3 pieces of government ID to prove you are who you are. Except that the criminals can easily get two pieces of ID and then they own your identity.
          [ Reply to This | Parent ]
          How much longer? (Score:1)
          by j1mmy (yesspam@j1mmy.com) on Monday August 05, @08:50AM (#4011258)
          (User #43634 Info | Last Journal: Thursday December 20, @12:58AM)
          How much longer until we see something like that in the U.S.?

          It's called the social security administration.
          [ Reply to This | Parent ]
          IPv6? (Score:1)
          by DieNadel on Monday August 05, @08:53AM (#4011270)
          (User #550271 Info)
          I think that instead of 11-digit identification number, they should be given each person an IPv6 address.
                  OK, we've still got privacy problems, but at least we are one step closer to some real use of IPv6 technology.
          [ Reply to This | Parent ]
          • Re:IPv6? by Chexsum (Score:1) Monday August 05, @09:16AM
            • Re:IPv6? by Boss, Pointy Haired (Score:1) Monday August 05, @10:03AM
          • Re:IPv6? by nigelc (Score:1) Monday August 05, @12:47PM
          RequestForInfo (Score:1)
          by PseudonymousCoward on Monday August 05, @08:54AM (#4011276)
          (User #161283 Info)
          I, too, have a gut reaction against government involvement in my personal life. But I don't actually know how "identification", "authentication", "authorization", and "privacy" (to mention four security buzzwords) interact.

          Can someone point me to some useful background material that will help me make judgements on issues such as a national ID card and privacy?
          -----
          [ Reply to This | Parent ]
          • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
          I never understood American fear ... (Score:4, Insightful)
          by Khazunga on Monday August 05, @08:55AM (#4011283)
          (User #176423 Info)
          ... of a national ID number. In Europe its quite common -- except for the brits. The real question is whether companies or the state can do joins on the different databases.

          Portuguese laws forbid different entities from cross-referencing their databases, without explicit approval of the citizens. The way it is written, it even affects different departments of the state -- leading to a social security number, a tax ID number, etc.

          I think it is a lot worse the way its done in the US, where everyone and their dog knows your SS#. It is very easy to cross-reference the DBs. At least here, they'd need to do some data mining...

          [ Reply to This | Parent ]
          Alarmist article (Score:2)
          by kbs on Monday August 05, @08:55AM (#4011286)
          (User #70631 Info | http://www.andrew.cmu.edu/~shiue)
          Japan, and many other countries in Asia already had a "family registry" system in place. Taiwan has one too, although their system has always been a national system. It's not particularly unusual. The only thing that's different here than the system already in place is that the information gathered is slightly more, and better tracked on a national scale.

          One thing I find rather amusing about this whole affair is that the fact Japan is standardizing what local municipalities have been doing is causing a ruckus, and that the whole "mandatory" aspect of it is trumped up. Japanese citizenship is particularly restrictive already, and given the heavy government involvement in the nationalized school system, etc. it should be no surprise that something such as an identity number should make such a big deal.

          Having the information of who lives where is not harmful in of itself, as long as there are severe checks in place as to who can access it and under what circumstances one can access that information. Understandably many in this forum perhaps distrust anyone with this sort of information, but at some level there needs to be some standard of information for every individual in order to do anomaly detection (read: finding terrorists).

          I think those of us in countries with a very heavy emphasis on "individual rights" as opposed to "group rights" have a rather strong tendency to look at everything in the view of "self over society" as opposed to particularly respecting other nation-systems and such. Given that it seems the legislation passed, I doubt that the majority does not support this action.

          That being said, the United States could not (at this time anyway) pass anything resembling that... people are way too enamored with states rights for anything to ever become nationalized.

          -k
          [ Reply to This | Parent ]
          Different cultures? (Score:1)
          by DataRider001 on Monday August 05, @08:56AM (#4011288)
          (User #516833 Info)
          Although the U.S. are limiting privacy more and more, and this Japanese system is certainly also a very likely invasion of privacy, there is a big difference to keep in mind. The U.S. have a long tradition of privacy, to say the least. It is (was?) one of the fundamental values of this nation. In traditional Japanese culture privacy is an alien concept (just like "right"). Western people think of themselves as individuals in a society, wereas Japanees think in the first place of society and their duties towards it. In this light it is easier to understand why there isn't a larger group of people having problems with this system. The people who *do* have a problem are most likely western oriented. I sure do hope the U.S. or the E.U. (I am Dutch) will not use this system as an example. Perhaps a Japanese reader who can tell something more about this?
          [ Reply to This | Parent ]
          Benefit--voter registration (Score:4, Insightful)
          by PMuse on Monday August 05, @09:00AM (#4011298)
          (User #320639 Info)
          In a country where video rental stores routinely demand your social security number before they allow you to rent tapes (and it takes a minimum 30-minute argument with 3 managers to convince them that's an illegal requirement), most or all of the harms of universal ID number are already here. Let's get some of the benefits. With a national ID number and national ID card,

          1. Voter registration can be eliminated: Along with all the civil rights battles that entails. Anyone old enough can simply show up at a polling place on election day and vote. This eliminates a whole level of exclusionism.

          2. Driver's Licenses can be just for drivers: So, so many Americans who can't drive (for reasons including age, disability, etc.) fight to maintain their driver's licenses because it's HARD to participate in society and commerce without one. A national ID card would provide all persons with an ID that merchants wouldn't question -- and no need for a driving test. Furthermore, people who know that they're unsafe, incapable drivers would have an alternative to keeping their licenses. This would allow them to avoid the temptation to drive.
          [ Reply to This | Parent ]
          What's everyone worried about? (Score:3, Insightful)
          by altgrr on Monday August 05, @09:00AM (#4011300)
          (User #593057 Info)
          If the Government chooses to keep such information about you, that's fine. I for one would find life much easier if my health records were accessible to every doctor's surgery - when I come home from uni, I have to re-register if I want a doctor's appointment.

          Far, far more important that the storage of such data is who is allowed to retrieve it. For example, if there were to be a medical study, you might expect that your health records (relevant parts thereof), gender, age, region and the kind of conurbation you live in (village/town/city etc) were made available, but no personal identifiers.

          I find it far more of an invasion of privacy that my telephone and e-mail contacts are abused by people or companies wanting to sell their wares for me. The only reason we might be afraid of a centralised data repository is that it could be hacked. I would contend that, providing appropriate measures are taken, and that photographs are not stored on the database, there is nothing to be afraid of.
          [ Reply to This | Parent ]
          • Re:What's everyone worried about? by InternalWave (Score:2) Monday August 05, @09:53AM
          • Re:What's everyone worried about? (Score:4, Insightful)
            by BlackHawk on Monday August 05, @10:37AM (#4011809)
            (User #15529 Info | http://bobjames.freeservers.com/)
            I find it far more of an invasion of privacy that my telephone and e-mail contacts are abused by people or companies wanting to sell their wares for me. The only reason we might be afraid of a centralised data repository is that it could be hacked. I would contend that, providing appropriate measures are taken, and that photographs are not stored on the database, there is nothing to be afraid of.

            I suppose it's too much to hope you're joking. Out of curiosity, where do you think those telemarketers and spammers are getting your contact information in the first place? There are several states (Michigan comes to mind immediately) that have no law prohibiting the state government from selling the data they collect to any business who buys it. The fear that the centralized databased could be cracked is actually minor. After all, why break in, when you can slip the doorman a large enough payment, and have him open the door for you?

            In addition, given the current climate of terror running amuck in the US ever since 9-11 and the passage of the so-called Patriot Act, there will be little resistance in the halls of the legislature to idea of some kind of biometric data attached to the central record. Whether that's a photo, a retinal print or a genetic sequence would remain to be seen.

            [ Reply to This | Parent ]
          ID's not used enough (Score:1)
          by photonic on Monday August 05, @09:01AM (#4011302)
          (User #584757 Info)
          As posted by many others i think this is not a big issue and most western countries already have their own sort of social security number. I agree that their might be serious privacy problems if the system is used in to many places (e.g. if your boss could track via your ID what you bought last night in the supermarket).

          A recent survey in the Netherlands however showed some cases where is not used enough. A simple coupling of some databases showed that some ID's were used by up to 100 illegal workers and that some ID holders were being treated in three hospitals simultaneously.

          [ Reply to This | Parent ]
          Sweden have this. (Score:1)
          by miffo.swe (hedblom@@@djupo...com) on Monday August 05, @09:02AM (#4011309)
          (User #547642 Info | Last Journal: Monday August 05, @01:08PM)
          But we also have fairly good regulation on who, when and what can use it. Its not crossreferenced all over so as of today its hard to misuse it. Mostly its used in small database islands that connects their data to the Personal ID, not the other way around. If it does connect the ID to all sorts of data like health, crime, taxes etc then its Orville alright. When used like in sweden its rather harmless unless someone gets access to all the different databases and does an own crossreference..
          [ Reply to This | Parent ]
          Who gets access? (Score:1)
          by JohanV on Monday August 05, @09:02AM (#4011312)
          (User #536228 Info | http://slashdot.org/)
          I think that the main threat these systems pose to privacy is not how much data becomes accessible to the government, but how much data becomes accessible to private entities. I remember seeing a story (on CNN?) about a bar somewhere in the US that required everybody who entered to have their drivers license scanned. Through some system the owner could then extract details such as name, gender and address to profile his customers.

          I think that these systems pose a far bigger threat to the privacy of the average citizen as the desire of some government to give everybody a unique number to be able to normalize some databases that are only for internal use.
          [ Reply to This | Parent ]
          privacy isn't about primary keys ... (Score:1)
          by Unordained on Monday August 05, @09:03AM (#4011320)
          (User #262962 Info | http://csmaster.dyndns.org/)
          ... it's about the data. yes, the US has Social Security Numbers. most countries have something similar, if they've managed to stop the killing in the streets. it's just too handy ...

          a) in the united states, i believe there is a law the prevents (in theory) different branches of the government from centralizing all of the data they have about you. not that any of you have been checking recently to make -sure- they're not ... but in theory, this is supposed to somehow prevent your privacy from being totally breached. bah. it's the government. it already owns you from birth anyway ... if you can't escape laws, why escape identification? ...

          b) without the use of id numbers guaranteed by the government to be semi-unique (SSN's are not actually unique -- there have been quite a few reported cases of the same SSN being assigned to multiple physical beings at once, even while both were alive. that wasn't supposed to happen, but it did) ... most places would have to rely on a hash of your name (spelling, order, chunks) and birthday (just make sure you give it to them in mm/dd/yyyy if you're in the states, or dd/mm/yyyy elsewhere.) it's already bad enough in databases as it is ... do you -really- want DBA's who don't know what they're doing setting up those constraints?

          c) theft of the id number is a problem. but that's not exactly your government's fault -- the main cases i've known of involve the use of an SSN in the credit arena -- registering for new credit cards, etc. my roommate has, so far, had i think 5 different cases of people opening bank accounts in his name. the dork, however, didn't realize that the bank might use the address linked to the SSN in order to verify the information. the banks called him, and he was able to shutdown the operation before it got expensive.

          d) consider theft of other id -- credit card number? doesn't it make you somewhat ancy when you pay with a credit card at a restaurant ... and leave a signed slip of paper, often containing your full 16-digit account number -and- expiration date on the table? for one thing, if someone walks off with it ... the restaurant is pissed at you for not paying. and then ... well ... that random person can now buy online, under your name (unless the site happens to required the 3 (sometimes 4?) digit number on the back of the card) or checks your shipping address vociferally.)

          so then ... does the lack of numeric primary keys -really- lead to a lack of privacy? i'd say no. if anything, it leads to privacy. with HIPAA (government-enforced medical privacy act) you -may- release information from your medical database to random parties, so long as it is impossible for those random parties to link the data back to actual people. you are allowed, however, to include your own information with it, to help -you- link it back to the original individual if necessary. sequentially-numbered primary keys work quite well for that, and users usually don't even have to notice that records aren't linked by a concatenation of 16 fields involving all sorts of text fields (yes, i had to replace a DB built by an idiot) ... in fact, my users quite enjoyed it! (what? you mean i can change info ... and it won't get confused! oh my!)

          so really, grow up. identification is one thing to worry about ... but not the biggest. you should be worried about where that information goes, and who has it ... and why. consider, for example, something you (arguably) have less control over than your records with the U.S. federal government: your credit history. hard to see, hard to interpret ... and a pain to do anything about. why? because they can. and there, it's about money ... (okay, so taxes are money too -- but there's gotta be a difference somewhere

          Read the rest of this comment...

          [ Reply to This | Parent ]
          I know I feel reassured... (Score:1)
          by ianscot on Monday August 05, @09:05AM (#4011326)
          (User #591483 Info)
          The story's told at such a high level that you can't tell any of the details -- what provisions of the Japanese constitution would this violate, how's the number "secured," how did the mayor "cut the local computer system off from the new network," what's it even used for and are those uses narrowly defined, and so on. Still, don't you find this sort of quote reassuring?
          The government says it has created a security system that can detect suspicious access to the database.

          "It's quite common to feel uneasy about something new. We want to keep explaining until such anxieties disappear," said Chief Cabinet Secretary Yasuo Fukuda.

          (It's "quite common to feel uneasy" about being rounded up in railway cars, too, big fellah. Just to let you know.)

          Man, we need to get some advice from the government of Japan. A totally secure system. Impressive.

          [ Reply to This | Parent ]
          • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
          European National ID systems (Score:2)
          by Mansing on Monday August 05, @09:06AM (#4011329)
          (User #42708 Info)
          I have read several posts from people residing in other countries. It seems that, for the most, part all have national ID systems in place. Most have also claimed that this is a workable system and not an invasion of privacy.

          My question would be how of these countries have strict laws prohibiting the sale or release of the national ID system information? Most of my concern over a national ID is not with the identification per se, but what could be done with the information later.

          The US has had many, many historical abuses of privacy and private information (McCarthy-ism, Hoover's FBI) that raises concerns to the public. These abuses are not long in the past for the US, and make US citizens think twice about the government holding all that information.

          And when a Senator is "puchased" by a rich lobby, how long will it be before the information is "for sale" because of legislation?
          [ Reply to This | Parent ]
          Only 11 Digits (Score:1)
          by essiescreet on Monday August 05, @09:08AM (#4011332)
          (User #553257 Info)
          Give 'em a few years, they'll need more than that...
          [ Reply to This | Parent ]
          seven of nine (Score:1)
          by stoffel on Monday August 05, @09:11AM (#4011341)
          (User #106124 Info | http://christophkempen.com/)
          your name would be for example:

                37912331 of 99999999999

          1 big happy family
          [ Reply to This | Parent ]
          Don't bother, Big Brother's not for tomorrow... (Score:2, Insightful)
          by [Arkan] on Monday August 05, @09:12AM (#4011345)
          (User #24212 Info)
          As mentioned in previous (and surely following) posts, this kind of PIN (as in Personal Identification Number) already exists in some form or another in many countries. In fact, I doubt that any country with a social security system can do without such a number.

          The danger of these primary keys are not their existence, but the amount of data you can obtain when knowing them. For instance, how much a problem can it be is the social security file contains only your name/birthdate/gender?
          Now imagine that you could (and at least here in France, it's technically impossible: even the social security services can't find their way in their own files!) correlate with a given PK the whole life of a person: from is medical history to his credit card log? Here is the real danger!
          Fortunatly for us, such a thing is far from achievable for three reasons:
            - the different databases are not interconnected, making a correlation a pain in the cheek
            - access to some of these databases is restricted, as in "please show me sufficient proof of your identity to access your own information". You'll certainly have more information from news papers archives
            - the PK mentionned above is only used in just a few files, all the others mainly indexed on your firstname/lastname. Yeah, regularly someone "dies" in place of someone else...

          Add to this the cluelessness of government services regarding technology as a whole, and before they come to know anything about relationnal databases, we'll all be far more controled and filed by RIAA/MPAA and affiliates.

          --
          Arkan
          [ Reply to This | Parent ]
          11-digit number- where? (Score:1)
          by glh on Monday August 05, @09:16AM (#4011361)
          (User #14273 Info | http://www.bestcoding.com/ | Last Journal: Monday August 05, @08:03AM)
          In Nazi Germany, I believe the numbers were tatooed (at least in some cases) on the prisoners. How will these Japanese be "marked" with their number? I didn't see anything in the article about that. But if this number is mandatory and so critical, I wouldn't be suprised to see some sort of "permanent" marking, such as a microchip or barcode.

          And if that's the case.. (not to get anyone in a panic or anything) take a look at Revalation chapter 12. Could this be a predecessor? Interesting.
          [ Reply to This | Parent ]
          • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
          The problem (Score:2)
          by evbergen on Monday August 05, @09:17AM (#4011367)
          (User #31483 Info | http://www.e-advies.info/)
          The problem is of course not the fact that your national government keeps your identity in a database in order to be able to issue passports and drivers licenses and to collect taxes and social insurances.

          And neither would I consider it a problem that credit companies decide to share a database containing people with bad debts, as long as there are some good laws governing access to it (e.g. the organization maintaining the database is not allowed to share it with companies that do not have a banking license, and there must be an expiry date).

          The problem is that the government's ID number is much too "convenient" for commercial purposes if no restrictions are put on its use, because the state guarantees unicity and life-long validity.

          So, the shared use of such a number is the problem, because suddenly all kinds of commercial entities have a means to match their user databases. And if the same unique key can be used on a number of databases, then those databases effectively form a single database.

          To prevent that, any democratic government should explicitly forbid the use of national IDs in commercial applications, forcing commercial entities to keep their own databases.

          Commercial entities should also be prohibited to share any personal information (that is, anyting uniquely linked to a person) with other entities without explicit, prior consent, where you'd indicate exclusively what information you allow to be shared. That's the only way to prevent them from simply teaming up to set up a private version of the social security number, mandating it for every transaction.

          I see no reason why the public would want to help companies to track a person's identity and share it with others. If the government does, it's simply not acting on behalf of the public.

          We've got to start giving some counter pressure to those "mark of the beast" plans that are perverted commercial interests masquerading as ways to fight terrorism.
          [ Reply to This | Parent ]
          • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
          The reason for the hubbub (Score:2)
          by zaren (holdthis@mail.com) on Monday August 05, @09:17AM (#4011368)
          (User #204877 Info | http://www.cafepress.com/darwinos)
          (NOTE: Anyone with firsthand experience on the Japanese system, please correct if if I'm wrong, these are just the ramblings of a gaijin reading the news from inside the U.S.)

          From what I read on the Japanese news sites, the problem is that this is a single nationwide database that will be available online, similar to the one that has been discussed in the recent past in the U.S. There's a great deal of concern about network hacking and identity theft.

          From an article on the issue:
          The system will link basic residency registries across the country by encoding information such as people's names, addresses, dates of birth and gender under 11-digit individual numbers. It will enable people to receive social benefits, such as children's allowances and pensions, without their resident cards, the government said. Officials also said the network will simplify administrative procedures, such as passport issuance, in the future.
          People say "Well, the US already has this in their Social Security number"... but a SS# is only part of the formula. To really do damage to someone the way the U.S. system operates, you need a few more pieces of information, like a driver's license number, bank account information, etc. Thankfully, the "American way" is to build your own system if you don't like someone else's (or even if you do like it, but want the credit for yourself), so there's a lot of gridlock and problems with getting data from one point to another between various state and national gov't agencies.

          Imagine how much identity theft would occur in the U.S. if there was one single database available online with all of this information, considering what OS the gov't would likely use to run such a database.

          Also, Japanese citizens already carry "resident cards". Ths is a similar concept to someone from the U.S. already having a SS# - why would they want or need ANOTHER government sponsored ID card? It's just another system where personal information can be stored and possibly accessed by someone that's not supposed to have it. Add to that the natural reluctance to having any government agency "keeping an eye" on them, and you can see the reason for the concern.
          [ Reply to This | Parent ]
          Slashdot Feature request -- trollbait (Score:1)
          by Unordained on Monday August 05, @09:18AM (#4011374)
          (User #262962 Info | http://csmaster.dyndns.org/)
          i've got moderator privileges ... can i not mark this entire article as trollbait (-1)? damn it ...
          [ Reply to This | Parent ]
        • 23 replies beneath your current threshold.
        • (1) | 2 | 3 (Slashdot Overload: CommentLimit 50)
            Success is relative: It is what we can make of the mess we have made of things. -- T.S. Eliot, "The Family Reunion"
          All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners. Comments are owned by the Poster. The Rest © 1997-2002 OSDN.
          [ home | awards | contribute story | older articles | OSDN | advertise | self serve ad system | about | terms of service | privacy | faq ]