Reuters IndexFind your home on NYTimes.com/realestate
The New York Times
Home
Job Market
Real Estate
Automobiles
News
International
National
Politics
Business
Technology
- E-Business
- Circuits
- Columns
Science
Health
Sports
New York Region
Education
Weather
Obituaries
NYT Front Page
Corrections
Opinion
Editorials/Op-Ed
Readers' Opinions

Click Here
Features
Arts
Books
Movies
Travel
Dining & Wine
Home & Garden
Fashion & Style
New York Today
Crossword/Games
Cartoons
Magazine
Week in Review
Photos
College
Learning Network
Services
Archive
Classifieds
Theater Tickets
NYT Mobile
NYT Store
E-Cards & More
About NYTDigital
Jobs at NYTDigital
Online Media Kit
Our Advertisers
Your Profile
Your Profile
E-Mail Preferences
News Tracker
Premium Account
Site Help
Newspaper
Home Delivery
Customer Service
Electronic Edition
Media Kit
Text Version
Tips Go to Advanced Search
Search Optionsdivide
go to Member Center Log Out
Welcome, malak
E-Mail This Article Printer-Friendly Format
Most E-Mailed Articles

May 6, 2002

I.B.M. Overtakes Oracle in Total Database Sales

By REUTERS
Other Resources
Get Stock Quotes
Look Up Symbols
Portfolio | Company Research
U.S. Markets | Int. Markets
Mutual Funds | Bank Rates
Commodities & Currencies
William Safire: On Language
William Safire is the most widely read writer on the English language. This unique collection includes articles selected by Mr. Safire from his "On Language" column.

Read now for just $4.95.


Filed at 10:57 p.m. ET

PALO ALTO, Calif. (Reuters) - International Business Machines Corp. took the No. 1 spot last year in terms of total new database software sales from long-time leader Oracle Corp., according to a new report from Dataquest, a unit of technology research firm Gartner Inc.

Oracle remains king of the relational database software segment that accounts for 80 percent of the overall $8.84 billion database market, but slipped because of competition from IBM and Microsoft, Dataquest said.

Elsewhere, Oracle lost ground on Microsoft's Windows server platform -- where it was overtaken by the software behemoth -- and retained its lead on the Unix platform.

``It's not a technology issue with Oracle ... Oracle has a credibility problem with respect to its sales and business practices and its prices,'' said Dataquest analyst Betsy Burton, who noted that database buyers were cost-conscious in 2001.

Dataquest said IBM's total database revenue grew to $3.06 billion from $2.94 billion in 2000. Sales from Informix, which Big Blue bought last year, contributed $264.4 million and the computer giant's DB2 database software products gained momentum. IBM now has about a dozen database products, which run on everything from Windows and Unix operating systems to older mainframes.

Oracle, which previously had been on the top of the heap, slid to No. 2 as its new database sales dipped to $2.83 billion from $2.97 billion a year earlier.

Microsoft landed at No. 3 with sales of $1.44 billion.

Burton said IBM's Informix acquisition gave it the edge over Oracle in 2001.

``They bought market share,'' Burton said.

``It would have taken us five years to build the business without Informix,'' IBM spokeswoman Lori Bosio said.

NUMBERS DISPUTE

Oracle's leadership in the relational database market weakened as its overall share fell to 39.8 percent in 2001 from 42.5 percent in 2000.

IBM's share of the market increased to 34.1 percent in 2001 from 32.6 percent the year earlier. Microsoft's share was 14.4 percent, up from 11.6 percent.

Oracle Chief Financial Officer Jeff Henley -- who for many months has maintained the firm is not losing market share in the sector that provides nearly three-quarters of company software sales -- questioned Dataquest's methodology.

Henley told Reuters that IBM and Microsoft do not provide auditable database revenues and said the companies' reported numbers include sales of other products.

``I'm not sure what their numbers are. There's no way to check them,'' Henley said.

Dataquest analyst Burton said her firm gathers its information from a variety of sources, including public filings and client interviews.

``They're not the vendors' numbers, they're Gartner's numbers,'' Burton said.

Oracle customers lately have been choosing its moderately priced ``standard edition'' database over its more expensive, high-end database. The company also saw its revenues hurt when big-spending dot-coms and telecoms fell on hard times.

``You can't take a one-year snapshot and say Oracle is losing share,'' said Henley, who noted that database sales to existing customers -- who make up well over 75 percent of Oracle's database revenues -- have remained on track.

Oracle last summer cut prices on its databases after customers complained its so-called ``power-unit'' pricing, based on the number of processors a customer uses, was expensive and confusing.

This year, the company has been embroiled in a pricing flap with existing users over their use of data warehouse software.

Elsewhere, the state of California is seriously considering scrapping a $95 million software deal with the company after state auditors said taxpayers would pay $41 million too much for software few employees needed or wanted.

Oracle's stock, which last week fell to its lowest levels since 1999, is down 39 percent so far this year. Microsoft shares are 25 percent lower and IBM's stock, which hit a four-year low on Monday, is off 32 percent.

UNDER THE COVERS

Microsoft grabbed the No. 1 position on the Windows platform with 39.9 percent market share as Oracle, which held that spot last year, dropped to second place with 34 percent share.

Oracle continued to lead on Unix, but its share fell to 63.3 percent from 66.2 percent in 2001.

Dataquest said the overall database software market grew to $8.84 billion from $8.73 billion in 2000.

While Burton doesn't see 2002's overall database market growth being much to write home about, she expects the ''jockeying underneath the covers'' to continue.

``I don't think this market is going to be boring over the next year at all. I think there's going to be a lot of shifting,'' she said.



Home | Back to Reuters | Search | HelpBack to Top


E-Mail This Article Printer-Friendly Format
Most E-Mailed Articles


Advertiser Links
Join Ameritrade and get a special offer.


$7 Trades, No Inactive Fees, No Pressure to Trade

Expect the World every morning with home delivery of The New York Times newspaper. Click Here for 50% off.


Find your home on NYTimes.com/realestate
Copyright 2002 Reuters Ltd. | Privacy Information