OSDN:  Our Network - Newsletters - Advertise - Shop   SEARCH:     
NewsForge - The Online Newspaper of Record for Linux and Open Source
The Online Newspaper of Record      
for Linux and Open Source
July 20th, 2002
   Corporate Voices       Home     Linux.Com     Reports     NewsVac      
 
 
  Digital rights management workshop: The deck stacked against consumers?  
Tuesday July 16, 2002 - [ 09:34 AM GMT ]   Print this Article
Topic - Multimedia
-  -By Grant Gross -
Free Software and consumer-rights activists are asking for their positions to be heard during a digital rights management workshop sponsored by the Technology Administration of the U.S. Department of Commerce Wednesday in Washington, D.C. Critics say the panel as of now -- with bigwig representatives from the Motion Picture Association of America, Recording Industry Association of America, EMI, Disney, Microsoft, and ContentGuard -- sounds like a "pep rally for Hollywood."

Advertisement
Of 17 panelists scheduled to speak at the workshop Wednesday afternoon, only two -- Digitalconsumer.org and the Home Recording Rights Coalition -- appear to speak for consumers against Big Hollywood's vision of digital "rights management," depending on how you define what groups are consumer advocates. The NY for Fair Use count, for example, has the panel with only one consumer voice. But consumer-rights activists are expected to show up in force, including representatives of the Electronic Frontier Foundation, the Free Software Foundation and New York's Linux community.

"These panelists represent the major forces who have prompted Congress to propose such radical measures as Senator Fritz Holling's CBDTPA bill, which proposes to require content control to be built into all computers," says Seth Johnson, of the Information Producers Initiative. "Since the public holds the largest stake in the prospects of digital information and communications technology, it is crucial that a strong showing be made at this meeting." More of Johnson's "We are the Stakeholders" message he's been circulating is at the Information Producers Initiative Web site.

Members of the public are able to comment on digital rights management at the Technology Administration's Web site. Among the topics the Commerce Department is asking for comments on (our comments follow):

  • "The effectiveness of efforts to pursue technical standards or solutions that are designed to provide a more predictable and secure environment for digital transmission of copyrighted material."

    While at the same time taking away the public's fair-use rights to copyrighted material?

  • "Major obstacles facing an open commercial exchange of digital content." Could an obstacle to exchanging digital content be the commercial entities themselves?

  • "What a future framework for success might entail." If it's up to the RIAA, the MPAA and Microsoft, success is a lock-down on all digital content.

  • "Current consumer attitude towards online entertainment." Perhaps that fat-cat entertainment companies are trying to get richer by controlling every little detail about how their customers use legally purchased products?

Consumer-rights activists are also encouraging people to contact their congressional representatives to ask about fair representation on this panel and about digital "rights management" issues in general. [See the "What you can do NOW!" comment on the above linkedNewsForge NewsVac item.]

Cheryl Mendonsa, a public affairs officer for the Technology Administration, encourages people to comment on the Web site or to show up at the workshop, from 1 to 4 p.m. While she notes that only two consumer groups are on the panel, she adds, "we're in no way trying to leave the public out."

Comments from the Web site will be posted, she says, and members of the audience should have time to ask questions Wednesday. The workshop, a follow-up to one held last December, is a chance to "button-hole" big players in the debate, she adds, although it's hard for us to imagine someone changing Disney's opinion during a five-minute discussion

The purpose of the workshops is to get both sides on the issue together and talking, Mendonsa says, but there's no specific goal of introducing digital "rights management" legislation based on what happens during the workshop. "We've got two sides that disagree, and we can't move forward until we solve the problems," she says. "Let's solve the problems and move forward."

It'll be interesting to see if the workshop brings the two sides closer together.


 

( Post a new comment )

My view on DRM      (#19723)
by Anonymous Reader on 2002.07.16 6:50


The biggest problem with all DRM proposals are. What about the independent content creators. In the music case Bedroom producers and fresh new bands that use their expensive computers to record their new tracks.

DRM has an assumption of that the computer is only used to consume content and not to create content. If DRM reaches the computers it would not have any difference to gaming consoles.
[ Reply to This | Parent ]

the bottom line      (#19724)
by Anonymous Reader on 2002.07.16 6:54


anything these large greedy corporations do usually boils down to "how can we milk the consumer for more money"...
[ Reply to This | Parent ]

the concept is sound      (#19734)
by schmidm77 on 2002.07.16 8:49   | User Info |


I don’t understand why many of you are apposed to the concept of DRM when you are also for the idea that users should be bound to the terms of a license agreement. I should not use or distribute music or movies without paying, just as I should not distribute GPL software without releasing the source code. Terms are terms no matter what the content or media is.

If you are against anything, it should be the implementation of DRM and not the concept.

[ Reply to This | Parent ]

The worst blind is one that does not want to see      (#19774)
by lotrfan on 2002.07.16 12:03   | User Info |


Counter-argumenting the people that says they have not been offered any evidence that DRM will lock their rights in the hands of the industry and MS: Can you prove they won't? Their history tells so much on their behavior (misbehaviour?) that it alone would be sufficient to not believe them.

But let's talk their language: capitalism. They say that capitalism is in danger cause digital rights are not protected under law so only the big guys hands can control it. Seems like they don't believe in capitalism then ("market should determine the winner, competing against each other improves the overall situation") cause they want the state to mandate a law to protect them from competition. Why MP3 was all fear to record labels? Do you really believe it was pirating? Look at the numbers: wherever the number of doenloads of a music rises so rises the sales of the album containg that music. So, no reason to worry about loses of sales. Their real fear (and it's really fearsome for them) is that independent musicians or little players could get to the market without the assistance of the big labels. If they can, why would they need the big guys? Can you imagine why they are forcing independent web radios out of business? If they cannot control the audience (paying for the radios to play what they want), they have a fading business. No longer their methods (not always legal) work.

Now back to DRM. Do you really think that MS or any partner in this venture will gracefully allow any non-DRM content to be used in a computer without their bless? From what planet you came from? Just follow the discussion and look (irrestrictively of MS or Free religious following) and you will see what they want. Again, if they are the capitalists they say they are, why not compete, why lock all under the protection of the state? Isn't it the sign they have a outdated business model in their hands? Every time a business needed the protection of the state to stay in business, it meant they where already dead as a business entity, they just didn't know.

Isn't this the same industry that said VHS was bound to be the doom of the film industry? That K7 would destroy music industry? How can we give credit to the same indutry that can't recognize an elephant in front of their nose? Give them the power and we will be using CDs with 12 musics (2 good, 10 really not that good) for the next century. Inovation? Please don't say that word in front of these people, they will send you to jail for breaching some of their patents.
 
I could go forever in this line but I'll leave to you minding it all without any preconcept.
 
Flavio
"The man who knows HOW to do, will always have a job; The man who knows WHY will be his boss." As Seen on the Net
[ Reply to This | Parent ]

User Login

Username

Password


New User?
Lost Password?

Submissions
- News story
- Commentary
- Software

PriceCompare
Compare prices for a wide range of products.

Search


We want your story

Search Linux.com and NewsForge
  Choose section Enter keywords
   
  Find Linux software here (Note: words under four characters are not indexed)
© Copyright 2002 - OSDN Open Source Development Network, All Rights Reserved
About NewsForge.com  •  About OSDN  •  Privacy Statement  •  Terms of Use  •  Advertise  •  Contact Us