Welcome to Linux Journal  - The Premier Magazine of the Linux Community
Search
Topics
  Create an account Home  ·  Topics  ·  Forum  ·  Your Account  ·  Submit News  ·  Top 10  ·  Vendor Press  
Linux Journal
· Home
· Magazine Archive
· Web Article Index
· Help Desk
· Resources
· Links
· Wishlist
· Downloads
· User Groups (GLUE)
· Special Events

· Advertise in LJ
· Write for Us
· Recommend Us
· LJ Press Releases
· Vendor Press Releases
· Contact Us

Other Options
· FAQ
· Forum
· Members List


Subscriber Services
· Subscribe
· Renew Subscription
· Change Address
· Subscription Inquiry
· Customer Service
· LJ Interactive

Store
· Order Back Issues
· T-shirts
· Hats
· Reference Cards
· Books
· Fun Stuff

Who's Online
There are currently, 241 guest(s) and 1 member(s) that are online.

You are Anonymous user. You can register for free by clicking here

Kernel Watch
Nuts  2.5.15
09-May-2002
Sane  2.4.18
25-Feb-2002
Safe  2.2.20
02-Nov-2001
Archives

New Feature


Click for details!

Other SSC Sites
· Embedded Linux Journal
· Linux Gazette
· Linux Buyer'sGuide
· pr.linuxjournal.com
· SSC

Freshmeat
· phpFormGenerator 1...
· Say 1.1...
· PackAttack 0.3...
· xbindkeys 1.5.4...
· steghide 0.4.6...
· Video Disk Recorde...
· Sophie 1.34...
· GtkDatabox 0.2.2.0...
· cg 0.4...
· Youhp3 1.5.3...

read more...

Linux Weekly News
· Phpmole 1.3 releas...
· Kernel Cousin GNUe...
· Kernel Traffic #16...
· GNUstep Weekly Edi...
· Kooka Scanner Suit...
· An Introduction to...
· Linux's future in ...
· A couple of kernel...
· From Bit Part to L...
· Device Profile: Ri...

read more...

Industry Briefs: Getting it Wrong
Posted on Thursday, February 21, 2002 by Doc Searls
Printer Friendly Page  Send this Article to a Friend

Web Development Google does nothing to change its searches while improving its advertising, but that's not how the Associated Press told the story.

For quite some time, Google (which runs on upwards of 10,000 Linux boxes) has offered advertisers ways to present short text messages along with targeted search results. These "sponsored links" have more in common with newspaper classifieds than with banners or any other form of graphical display advertising, and they have been the source of very few complaints. More importantly, they mostly seem to be working for everybody involved: users, advertisers and Google.

Recently, Google updated the program--previously called AdWords and now named AdWords Select--with a variety of improvements. For both users and advertisers, it improved the chances for relevant sponsored links.

But on Tuesday, February 19, the Associated Press put out a story by Michael Liedtke (here it is on the New York Times site) about the new program, delivering news that Google had morphed into yet another pay-for-placement search engine. It starts off this way:

Online search engine maker Google Inc. is introducing a program that allows Web sites to be displayed more prominently if sponsors pay more money--an advertising-driven system derided by critics as an invitation to deceptive business practices.

Four paragraphs pass before Liedtke writes:

Mountain View-based Google will continue to reserve most of its site for results sorted by relevance to a search request--a model that has cultivated a local following among Web surfers and turned the 300-employee company into one of the Internet's emerging power brokers.

But writing "continues to reserve most of its site" hardly deflects the thrust of the story, which is mostly about pay-for-placement.

Since AP is the primary source of news for countless newspapers and other news organizations, the story was picked up all over the place and then run under headlines that delivered the same bad news:

  • "Google offers 'bid for placing' web searches", Silicon.com
  • "Google Lets Sites Bid for Rankings", Excite
  • "Google lets sites bid for rankings", Orlando Sentinel
  • "Google introducing 'pay-for-placement' program", Nando Times

This whole situation proved to be one where the press release did a better job of telling the story.

As far as I've been able to tell, the only news organization that got the story right was CNET, where Lisa M. Bowman wrote "Google unveils new pay-for-play plan". But even there the headline gave the impression that Google was now a pay-for-placement search engine. And, as with the AP piece, the secondary story was about Google's "rivalry" with Overture Services, Inc., which seems the antithesis of Google: "The Leader in Pay-for-Performance" search services.

Of course, the whole thing got thrashed out on Slashdot, where a careful reader would gather that Google had, in fact, produced a system that improved matters for everyone concerned. Ads were still unobtrusive, and (among other improvements) advertisers paid only for actual click-throughs.

Here's how Cindy McCaffrey, Google's VP of Corporate Marketing, put it in an e-mail to me yesterday:

All we've done is modify our AdWords self-service program so that advertisers can pay on a CPC basis (this is good news). The search results continue to be as unbiased and objective as ever. We do not allow advertisers to influence rankings in any way through payment.

What remains to be seen is how much damage AP has done to Google's reputation.

Doc Searls is Senior Editor of Linux Journal.



"Industry Briefs: Getting it Wrong" | Login/Create an Account | 2 comments
Threshold
  
The comments are owned by the poster. We aren't responsible for their content.
Re: Getting it Wrong (Score: 1)
by Glennf on Thursday, February 21, 2002
(User Info | Send a Message) http://blog.glennf.com/
The real question is, of course, if anybody who understands and uses Google reads the AP story and it affects their opinion of the service. The proof is in the pudding: they go to Google and see that it's the way it always was. I'm not sure why the AP characterized it in this way, because their story was absolutely accurate except for the slant, if that makes sense.


[ Reply to This ]


 

© 1994-2002 Specialized Systems Consultants, Inc. (SSC) publishers of Linux Journal.
Privacy Statement

Syndicated news file: news.rss or Netscape Sidebar: tab.rdf
Powered by PHP-Nuke