Search
Free newsletter
NewScientist.com
NewScientist.com home page Latest science & technology news Hot topics in science Q & A's from everyday science Feedback, letters, book reviews, interview Links to other science sites Contents of this week's print edition Subscribe to New Scientist magazine New Scientist magazine archive Search 1000's of science and technology jobs
NEWS
All the latest news
Conference News
Search News
 
 


Top Stories
 

 
Top Science Jobs
 
 
The World's No.1 Science & Technology News Service
 
 

Microsoft's anti-piracy plans spark controversy

 
17:05 01 July 02
 
NewScientist.com news service
 

A recent software update for Microsoft's Windows Media Player requires users to permit the automatic installation of undisclosed future anti-piracy measures.

Computer enthusiasts have raised concerns about the agreement, saying it could force home users to hand over control of their computers and might open them up to new security risks. Microsoft has yet to explain what future updates it plans to install through the media program.

The software update was issued on June 26 to fix a security bug in Microsoft's Windows Media Player. The End User License Agreement displayed during installation of the patch requires users to agree to any future security updates related to "digital rights management", i.e. preventing copyright infringement.

It states: "In order to protect the integrity of content and software protected by digital rights management "Secure Content", Microsoft may provide security related updates to the OS Components that will be automatically downloaded onto your computer."

But some commentators fear this would give Microsoft free reign over a computer. Adrian Midgley, director the UK's Campaign for Digital Rights, says the updates could be used to prevent copying or to delete files altogether. He also says it could provide a potential security weak spot.

Midgley told New Scientist: "What's nasty is that you are forced to hand over control of your computer without even having the ability to discover what changes are going to be made and approve or reject them."

The Microsoft agreement says only that "we will use reasonable efforts to post notices on a web site explaining the update".

The most common way to protect audio files from unauthorised copying is through digital watermarking. An identifying "watermark" embedded in a copy-protected file will tell an audio or video program to refuse to copy it.

 

Will Knight


This story is from NewScientist.com's news service - for more exclusive news and expert analysis every week subscribe to New Scientist print edition.

 

Print this article Send to a friend

 
  For what’s in New Scientist magazine this week see Print Edition
 
  Search the Archive for more stories like this, originally published in the Print Edition
 
  Subscribe to New Scientist Print Edition
 
  Correspondence about this story should be directed to onlinenews@newscientist.com
 
  Sign up for our free newsletter
 
 

 
Online Conference News
 
 

British Psychological Society

 


 
More on this story
 

Related Stories

 
 
 
 
 
For more related stories
search the print edition Archive
 
 

Weblinks

 
 
 
 


Elsewhere today
All the best science stories from the web
Bush slashing aid for EPA clean-up at 33 toxic sites
New York Times (Free registration required)

NewScientist Archive: Free to Subscribers
 
 
 
About newscientist.com •  Subscribe •  Contact Us •  FAQ •  Media Information •  Disclaimer •  Terms and Conditions • 
Site Map •  Privacy Policy  © Copyright Reed Business Information Ltd.