ZDNet:  Reviews | Downloads | Tech Update | Prices
Page OneApplicationsNetworkingeBusinessHardwareCommentary



Applications


.Net Server's new name suggests delay
By Joe Wilcox
Special to ZDNet News
August 30, 2002, 8:06 AM PT


TalkBack!


Microsoft has once again tweaked the name of the successor to Windows 2000 Server, in a move that suggests its official release won't come until next year.

During the Redmond, Wash.-based company's annual employee meeting this week, executives revealed that the follow-up to Windows 2000 Server will be called Windows .Net Server 2003.

Microsoft developed the high-end operating system under the code-name Whistler. In April 2001, it officially named the product Windows 2002 Server. Microsoft later changed the name to Windows .Net Server and has now added 2003 to the product.

Click Here!

The tweaking of the name is another sign that the twice-delayed .Net Server will not reach the majority of customers before early 2003, analysts say. In October 2000, Microsoft said the product would ship in the second half of 2001. In April 2001, Microsoft pushed back delivery of the product, which is an essential component of the company's .Net Web services strategy, to early 2002. In March, the software giant again delayed delivery until the second half of 2002.

In late July, Microsoft issued the first release candidate, or near-final test version, of the product. But the company predicted that at least one more release candidate would be coming before the software's code would be certified final, or golden. Given that there are only four months remaining in the year and that it takes between four weeks and six weeks after release of gold code before new software appears on computers or store shelves, analysts are skeptical whether many, if any, customers will receive .Net Server 2003 this year.

Although Microsoft has publicly held to a 2002 delivery date, internally the company has more likely been looking at 2003, said IDC analyst Al Gillen.

"I don't think this represents a sudden change from, say, a couple months ago," he said. "I think they're on the same track they've been on for about the last six months. I wasn't expecting it out this year at this point."

Microsoft representatives could not be reached for comment about the availability of .Net Server 2003. But in late July, the company indicated the product was still on track for late-year release.

Still, Microsoft already has started switching over to .Net Server throughout the company, including in the systems that host the high-traffic Microsoft.com Web site.

But other companies may be slower making the transition because many already have moved to or are going to move to the very appealing Windows 2000 Server family, analysts say.

Windows NT 4, which preceded Windows 2000 Server, accounted for 61 percent of the Windows Server install base at the end of 2001, according to IDC. IDC expects more rapid adoption of Windows 2000 Server this year, but NT 4 is still projected to account for 32 percent of Windows Server software by the end of 2002.

"I know 2003 release is way further out than they were talking about," Gillen said. "But I'm not sure that the customer base is sitting around waiting for this product. It's another release coming pretty close to another major release. I think 2003 will be good for them." The majority of NT 4 holdouts would likely go to Windows 2000 Server, he said.

The new product will be available in four versions: Standard Edition, Enterprise Edition, Datacenter Edition and Web Edition.

One of the key attributes of .Net Server 2003 will be broad support for Extensible Markup Language (XML)-based Web services. XML, a cousin to the Hypertext Markup Language (HTML) used to format Web pages, is seen as an important mechanism for delivering Web services. Microsoft competitors, including IBM and Sun Microsystems, also are developing XML-based Web services.

Microsoft plans to adopt these XML services into other new products. The next version of Microsoft's productivity suite, code-named Office 11, will use XML as a native file format and connect to additional XML-based subscription services.

.Net Server 2003 also is an important product for delivering digital media services that would compete with server software from Apple Computer and RealNetworks. Apple last week released Mac OS X 10.2 Server, which can host and serve up digital media in the QuickTime 6 and MPEG-4 formats.

On Wednesday, Microsoft will release a public beta, or test version, of Windows Media 9 Series, its next digital media playback, authoring and server software. The release will take place at a Hollywood-style gala hosted by company Chairman Bill Gates in Los Angeles. Microsoft is expected to release new audio and video codecs as well. The digital media player also sports new features for safeguarding consumers’ privacy.

Microsoft is still refining its .Net Web services strategy, which Gates has described as progressing slower than originally projected. Analysts say that repeated delays delivering .Net Server may have contributed to the slower-than-expected progress.


Related Quotes
Quotes delayed 20+ minutes

  MICROSOFT CORP MSFT 49.08 -1.50

Quote Lookup  Symbol Lookup  Streaming Real Time Quotes
E-mail this story! Printer Friendly

Also on ZDNet
Find the tech gear you need in CNET's Back to School guide.
Get ahead of the competition with the BizTech Library.
Improve your PC's performance with the Memory Configurator.
Don't miss up-to-the-minute IT commentary on TechRepublic's blog.
Laid off? Find a new IT job today in our Career Center.


 TalkBack: Post your comment here
       Re: ..Net Server's new name suggests delay  Bob Wank

       Re: ..Net Server's new name suggests delay  Don Jackson

       (NT) will it cost more than $129?  fred fredrickson

       (NT) Bob..cheers for Linux...I cheer for open standards  Raymond Cote

       And this is surprising  Mike M

       Re: And this is surprising  P. Douglas

       Expect too much  Mike Klutts

       Re: And this is surprising  Vic Tayback

       RIGHT ON  Kofi Amparbeng

       Re: And this is surprising  Michael Kelly

       Re: ..Net Server's new name suggests delay  ron Dale

       This is terrible!  Mike Cox

       (NT) You certainly are a riot.  P. Douglas

       Re: You certainly are a riot.  Stewart Cannon

       (NT) Mike's in rare form today!  George Geddis

       Re: This is terrible!  Andrew Graaff

       Story angle for ZDNET  Gary Nelson

       Re: ..Net Server's new name suggests delay  Mike Cox

       Re: ..Net Server's new name suggests delay  Don Jackson

       Re: ..Net Server's new name suggests delay  Stewart Cannon

       Re: ..Net Server's new name suggests delay  Don Jackson

       Re: ..Net Server's new name suggests delay  Don Jackson

       With MS.NET, YOU Own the apps!  Mike Cox

       (NT) Obviously you've never written a line of code  Kevin Ray

       Re: Obviously you've never written a line of code  Yagotta B. Kidding

       I've heard of tongue in cheek...  Robert Crocker

       Re: ..Net Server's new name suggests delay  Stewart Cannon

       Re: ..Net Server's new name suggests delay  Kevin Ray

       Re: ..Net Server's new name suggests delay  Don Jackson

       (NT) I do miss OS/2 -- it had so much potential  Kevin Ray

       Re: ..Net Server's new name suggests delay  Don Jackson

       *GASP!*  Basil Exposition

       Looks like  Ed Alexander

       Licensing 6.0 = delay, delay, delay, delay, delay  George Johnstone

       may i suggest a name?  Matias Moyano

       Why sell .NET Server, when Win2K is selling  Richard Moore

       Re: Why sell .NET Server, when Win2K is selling  Andrew Graaff

       Recent MS vs. Sun vs. Linux RTMs  Jay Worley

       Re: Recent MS vs. Sun vs. Linux RTMs  Matthew Gardiner

       Re: Why sell .NET Server, when Win2K is selling  Jim K

       Re: ..Net Server's new name suggests delay  Don Jackson

       Re: ..Net Server's new name suggests delay  dead user

       How About .Biz for MS-Biznezz Servers? ;-)  Clayton Muhler

       Re: ..Net Server's new name suggests delay  dg talkin

       GOOD! Get it right BEFORE releasing it.  Don Rupert

       Re: GOOD! Get it right BEFORE releasing it.  Kevin Ray



 Search


 
 Tech Update

The perfect desktop Linux

Solving the integration conundrum

Database benchmark wars: What you need to know

More software analysis...

 News in Brief

Nikon adds to digital camera line  10:20AM

Fox, RealNetworks kick off live sports  07:26AM

AOL Latin America faces delisting  07:17AM

Multi-hour outage hits AT&T Broadband  06:08AM

Nvidia updates graphics software  04:34AM

More...

 Commentary

KNORR KNORR
Tech Update's expert knows how to apply the latest innovations More...

JUDGE JUDGE
Like it or not--we need Microsoft's security More...

More Commentary...


ZDNet Tech Update
Featured Resource Centers
Sybase:
Request for more info, Whitepapers and more.
Gateway:
Hardware, Products and more.

 News Tools

 News Archives

 News in Brief

 News for your PDA

 Contact Us

 Corrections
Newsletters
Tech Update Today
Security Update
OS Update




All newsletters
FAQ
Manage my newsletters


ZDNet
Services: IT Jobs | Memory Upgrades | BizTech Library | CNET Back to School Guide | Newsletters

      CNET Networks: Builder | CNET | GameSpot | mySimon | TechRepublic | ZDNet
About CNET Networks 

About Us | Feedback | Your Privacy | Service Terms | Advertise | ZDNet Jobs
 
Copyright © 2002 CNET Networks, Inc. All rights reserved. ZDNet is a registered service mark of CNET Networks, Inc. ZDNet Logo is service mark of CNET Networks, Inc.